Two Different Exercise Training in Frozen Shoulder Treatment

July 21, 2023 updated by: Zeynal YASACI, Istanbul University

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Exercise Training in Frozen Shoulder Treatment

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two different exercise programs in patients with frozen shoulders.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study, all patients giving written informed and meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized a double-blind manner in a 1:1 (participant and investigator) to graded motor imagery or exercise group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged >60 years
  • Patients with shoulder pain of at least six months' duration secondary to tendinopathy and/or partial rotator cuff tear;
  • Patients with ability to follow simple orders; iii)
  • Patients with ability to sign to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Normal passive ROM
  • External ROM < 30
  • To have received treatment (physiotherapy, intra-articular injection, surgery) related to the existing complaint
  • Pain < 3 according to the numbered pain assessment scale

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Graded Motor İmagery
Graded Motor İmagery (GMI) group will receive a treatment protocol consisting of Graded Motor Imagery, cold therapy, traditional exercises and home exercises.

Graded Motor Imagery program will be performed two times a week for six consecutive weeks and will include the following three steps: laterality training, imagined movements, and mirror therapy.

  1. Right-left discrimination training (lateralization training)
  2. Imagination of hand movements (motor imagery):
  3. Mirror therapy Treatments including traditional physiotherapy approaches; joint mobilizations, stretching, scapula focused exercises etc.
Active Comparator: Exercise
Exercise group will receive training involves mobilizations, stretching, specific exercises for the frozen shoulder.
Treatments including traditional physiotherapy approaches; joint mobilizations, stretching, scapula focused exercises etc.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was developed to measure current shoulder pain and disability in an outpatient setting. The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability.
Baseline,6th week and 8th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline NPRS at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain. It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale. The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain.
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
Change from baseline range of motion at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
Range of motion is the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements.
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
Change from baseline QuickDASH at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
The purpose of the QuickDASH is to use 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
Change from baseline two-point discrimination at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
The two-point discrimination test is used to assess if the patient is able to identify two close points on a small area of skin, and how fine the ability to discriminate this are. It is a measure of tactile agnosia, or the inability to recognize these two points despite intact cutaneous sensation and proprioception.
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
Change from Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report measure designed to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain.
Baseline,6th week and 8th week
Change from SF-12 at 6th and 8th week
Time Frame: Baseline,6th week and 8th week
The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. It is often used as a quality of life measure.
Baseline,6th week and 8th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Derya Çelik, Istanbul University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16.01.2022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adhesive Capsulitis

Clinical Trials on Graded Motor Imagery

Subscribe