An Integrative Model for Palliative Care in End-Stage Liver Disease

July 6, 2023 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
The purpose of this research study is to understand the impact of palliative care in ESLD on quality of life, emergency room or hospital visits, and on care provider burden, and to work to develop the best way to provide palliative care in ESLD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have multiple symptoms that impact their quality of life and result in more emergency room and hospital visits. Palliative care is a medical model that can help alleviate pain and suffering and reduce need for urgent medical care and can do so while continuing other appropriate medical care. While palliative care consults are used in those with ESLD, despite the pain and suffering that accompanies ESLD, palliative care is often used too little and too late.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Hospitalized patients with ESLD and their caregivers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Primary participant:

  • admission for decompensated cirrhosis, age ≥ 18
  • willingness to sign consent
  • able to read and understand English
  • presence of decompensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension (jaundice, ascites, HE, hepatohydrothorax, AKI, HRS and/or variceal bleeding) or HCC

Caregiver:

  • identified as the primary caregiver of the participant
  • age ≥ 18
  • willingness to sign consent
  • able to read and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

Primary participant:

  • prior liver transplant
  • lack of capacity to provide informed consent (in the judgement of the investigator)
  • already in receipt of palliative or hospice care
  • those who are likely to receive a LT during the index admission

Caregiver:

• none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
End Stage Liver Disease (ESLD)
Patients with ESLD
Other: Standard of care including palliative care
Usual care includes laboratory evaluations, imaging, and certain procedures and medications. In some cases of patients undergoing transplant evaluation, usual care will also include multiple visits with members of the liver transplant team. A palliative care consult will also be part of standard of care. The primary goal of the palliative care consult is not to arrange hospice (though that can be done in appropriate situations) but to identify and try to address the impacts of the disease and its symptoms on patient's life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptom intensity
Time Frame: Up to 60 days
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) - participants rate the intensity of common symptoms on 0-10 scale with 0= no symptom and 10=worst symptom imaginable. Scores range from 0 to 90 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
Up to 60 days
Change in liver disease QOL
Time Frame: Up to 60 days
Short-Form Liver Disease QOL - The SF-LDQOL includes 36 disease-targeted items representing nine domains: symptoms of liver disease, effects of liver disease, memory/concentration, sleep, hopelessness, distress, loneliness, stigma of liver disease and sexual problems. The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 0-100 with higher scores indicating better QOL.
Up to 60 days
Change in depression
Time Frame: Up to 60 days
Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) is a self-report instrument which assesses depression. Scores range from 0 to 27 with higher scores indicating worse depression.
Up to 60 days
Change in anxiety
Time Frame: Up to 60 days
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7) is a self-report instrument which assesses anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
Up to 60 days
Change in perform ordinary tasks
Time Frame: Up to 60 days
The Karnofsky Performance Status will be used to assess participants ability to perform ordinary tasks. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater ability.
Up to 60 days
Change in caregiver burden
Time Frame: Up to 60 days
The Zarit Burden Interview
Up to 60 days
Hospital readmissions and/or Emergency room (ER) visits
Time Frame: 60 days
Number of participants with ER visits or who are readmitted to the hospital during the study period
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Virginia Commonwealth University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joel Wedd, MD, MPH, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 6, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HM20023178

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings