OEA for Targeting Lipid Metabolism in GWI

August 4, 2025 updated by: Roskamp Institute Inc.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Oleoylethanolamide (OEA) for Targeting Lipid Metabolism in Gulf War Illness

The study is a single site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open label extension to evaluate the effects of Oleoylethanolamine (OEA) on blood lipid and immune biomarkers in participants with Gulf War Illness (GWI).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The 1991 Gulf War (GW) was fought by a coalition of 30 countries that included 700,000 U.S. troops. Although the war itself lasted two months, adverse health consequences from this conflict are still experienced by GW veterans. Soon after their return, many soldiers started reporting multiple, seemingly unrelated symptoms, such as memory impairment, fatigue, gastrointestinal problems, and widespread pain. This illness is termed Gulf War Illness (GWI) and affects about 32% of GW veterans. Several animal studies suggest that GWI presentation involves disturbed immune responses in the brain that correspond with altered lipid metabolism. Many of these lipid alterations are detected in blood of veterans with GWI and point to an abnormal function of peroxisomes and mitochondria which regulate lipids that are required for cellular signaling and for maintaining normal physiology. The investigators' preclinical studies using a GWI mouse model showed that targeting peroxisomal lipid metabolism with oleoylethanolamide (OEA) reduced corrected immune function and normalized brain and blood lipid profiles in GWI mice. Therefore, the objective of this pilot clinical research study is to determine if OEA supplementation in veterans with GWI maintains healthy blood lipid and immune profiles.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34243
        • The Roskamp Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both genders, all ethnic groups, and ages up to 70.
  • Subject willing and able to give informed consent.
  • Medically stable as per the investigator's discretion.
  • Negative urine pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential. A woman is considered of childbearing potential unless she is surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation) or is postmenopausal (no menstrual cycle for 2 years or more).
  • Must be willing to use adequate birth control during the study and for 30 days after the last dose. Females agreeing to take an acceptable form of birth control per investigator discretion (where relevant). Females must prevent pregnancy or otherwise be unable to conceive.
  • Veterans deployed to the Gulf War between August 1990 and August 1991.
  • Veteran meets criteria for the CDC Chronic Multisymptom Illness (CMI) GWI definition or Kansas GWI definition.
  • Weight of 50.0kg - 200.0kg (110lbs - 440lbs).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed by a physician with medical or psychiatric conditions that would account for their symptoms or interfere with their ability to report their symptoms.
  • Female subject is either pregnant or nursing.
  • Have contraindications, allergy, or sensitivity to OEA, olive oil, or excipients (microcrystalline cellulose, silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate, macrogol polyvinyl alcohol copolymer, talc, titanium dioxide, glycerol monocaprylocaprate and polyvinyl alcohol).
  • Any significant medical condition that could interfere with study conduct, as per investigator discretion. These may include but are not limited to the following: untreated chronic hypertension (defined as systolic > 180 mmHg; diastolic >110 mmHg), myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening, renal failure, hepatic failure, and/or receiving chemotherapy.
  • Clinically significant lab values for clinical laboratory assessments.
  • Poor venous access.
  • Current use of any OEA supplement products within 30 days of screening.
  • Participation in another clinical trial involving dietary or pharmaceutical intervention within 90 days of screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Study Supplement: OEA
26 subjects will take the supplement (oleoylethanolamide) during the first phase of the study. 200mg will be taken twice a day for the 10-week period in phase one.
Dietary supplement: Oleoylethanolamide (OEA)
Oleoylethanolamide (OEA) is a naturally occurring ethanolamide that acts as a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) agonist, thereby modulating lipid profiles.
Placebo Comparator: Control
26 subjects will take the placebo during the first phase of the study (10 weeks).
Dietary supplement: Placebo
Visually matching placebo capsules will contain the same inactive ingredients present in the manufactured OEA capsules, with the exception of any OEA compound.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in lipid biomarker profiles
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The primary objective of the study is to assess the change in lipid levels in the blood between the two treatment arms over the 10-week placebo-controlled phase.
10 weeks
Changes in immune biomarker profiles
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The primary objective of the study is to assess the change in cytokine levels in the blood between the two treatment arms over the 10-week placebo-controlled phase.
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in fatigue
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The study will use the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) to assess fatigue.
10 weeks
Changes in mood
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The study will use the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to assess mood.
10 weeks
Changes in pain
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The study will use the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) to assess pain.
10 weeks
Changes in cognition (neurocognitive)
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The study will use the CNS Vital Signs computerized neurocognitive assessment software to assess memory. The computerized test uses individual tests to comprise a neurocognitive index score that can be used to evaluate neurocognitive status.
10 weeks
Changes in cognition (neuropsychological)
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The study will use the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) cognitive test to assess memory. The test incorporates immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional, language, attention, and delayed memory components to determine a total scaled score for neuropsychological status. This total score ranges from 200 to 800, with higher scores increasing the associated percentile.
10 weeks
Changes in quality of life
Time Frame: 10 weeks
The study will use the Quality of Life Scale (SF36).
10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Roskamp Institute Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
United States Department of Defense

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Laila Abdullah, PhD, The Roskamp Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Hoffmann, MD, The Roskamp Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RI-OEA-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings