PENG Block Versus LP Block for THA Postop Pain

April 26, 2024 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

PENG Block Versus LP Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Anterior Total Hip

The purpose of this randomized, double blinded, prospective study is to compare the postoperative analgesia provided by the PENG block to that provided by the LPB for patients undergoing primary anterior approach THA.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Regional anesthesia procedures represent a common modality for postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty surgeries (THA). The standard practice many years has been the Lumbar Plexus block (LPB), which anesthetizes the L1-L5 lumbar nerve roots1. While the LPB offers analgesia from the associated sensory block, it also blocks motor fibers, leading to lower extremity weakness that could potentially delay the patient's ability to participate in early physical therapy and may thereby delay discharge. In the past several years, newer regional anesthesia block approaches have been described and investigated in an attempt to provide patients with postoperative analgesia while avoiding associated muscle weakness, facilitating earlier physical therapy participation and discharge. One such nerve block is the peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block, which anesthetizes the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves providing sensory innervation to the hip joint capsule without consistently causing lower extremity weakness2. Some institutions are utilizing the PENG block to provide postoperative analgesia and facilitate early mobilization. There are currently no prospective studies that directly compare the efficacy of LPB to PENG block for providing postoperative analgesia after THA.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
154

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • elective primary total hip arthroplasty surgery anterior approach
  • provided informed consent
  • no contraindications to medications used in providing the analgesic blocks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to regional anesthesia, such as an allergy to amide local anesthetics
  • pre-existing coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia <100,000
  • refusal of analgesic block for pain management
  • presence of an progressive lower extremity neurological deficit
  • localized or systemic infection
  • chronic use of high dose opioid analgesics (defined as daily use greater than 60 mg oxycodone equivalents)
  • pregnant
  • refusal of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)
Those subjects assigned to the PENG treatment arm will receive a PENG block using 20mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine dosed in 5mL increments with negative aspiration beforehand and between each aliquot.
Drug: Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)
PENG block for postoperative pain management
Active Comparator: Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
Those subjects assigned to the LPB treatment arm will receive a stimulation-based LPB dosed with 20cc of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 dilution epinephrine dosed in 5mL increments with negative aspiration beforehand and between each aliquot.
Other: Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
LPB for postoperative pain management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score
Time Frame: hour 6
a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at six hours following block placement. Equivalency will be defined as a difference of less than one point in either direction on the eleven-point NRS pain scale. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.
hour 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NRS Pain Score
Time Frame: hour 12
a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 12 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.
hour 12
NRS Pain Score
Time Frame: hour 18
a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 18 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.
hour 18
NRS Pain Score
Time Frame: hour 24
a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 24 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.
hour 24
Distance Ambulated
Time Frame: hour 24
Recorded in feet during first physical therapy
hour 24
Motor Strength
Time Frame: hour 6
straight leg raise at 6 hours after block placed rated on a 0-5 scale with a higher score indicating better movement
hour 6
Time in Minutes Until Opioid Administration
Time Frame: hour 24
Time to first dose of opioid rescue for postoperative pain management - This outcome was evaluated in time to first opioid dose, which was measured in hours - no analysis for mean, median, or any of the others suggested - It was calculated as time of block to time of first opioid dose-hours and minutes.
hour 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rawad Hamzi, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 13, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00078699

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings