Intravitreal Ranibizumab Versus Its Combination With Dexamethasone in The Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

February 27, 2022 updated by: khaled gamal abueleinen, Cairo University

Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intravitreal Ranibizumab Versus Its Combination With Commercial Dexamethasone in The Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Intravitreal ranibizumab alone was Compared to adding dexamethasone to ranibizumab regarding central macular thickness, the visual acuity and the number of intravitreal injections needed to achieve the same effect on CMT and BCVA at the end of the 6 months duration of the study. Any significant change in final IOP, compared to baseline, in either group is reported.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This prospective randomized study measures the changes in central macular thickness, best corrected visual acuity and IOP in diabetic macular edema before and after the intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and dexamethasone, compared to ranibizumab alone, the current gold standard of care for diabetic macular edema.

Study participants were randomized into 2 groups: the first group received 3 Intravitreal injections of ranibizumab alone 1 month apart. While the second group received 1 Intravitreal injection of a combination of ranibizumab and 0.4 mg in 0.1 ml dexamethasone followed by 2 Intravitreal ranibizumab, 1 month apart (with dexamethasone if follow up OCT shows less than 10% improvement from baseline). Treatment was stopped when the treated eye achieved a central macular thickness of 250 microns or less with no focal parafoveal edema.

Final recorded central macular thickness in both groups compared to the baseline. By the end of the follow up period.

Final visual acuity was assessed in both groups compared to the baseline Change in final IOP, compared to baseline, in ranibizumab group and ranibizumab with dexamethasone group.

. The number of injections needed to achieve the same effect on CMT and BCVA.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • Cairo
      • Giza, Cairo, Egypt, 12411
        • Khaled G Abueleinen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetic macular edema with central macular thickness of 300 μm or greater (as measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography [OCT]).
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or less.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ● History of any treatment for DME (including grid or focal laser photocoagulation) within the last 6 months

    • History of panretinal photocoagulation within the last 6 months.
    • PDR as indicated with Fluorescein Angiography as it will require PRP which may affect DME.
    • Macular ischemia, as indicated with Fluorescein Angiography.
    • Cataract surgery within three months or cataract that requires surgical intervention during the follow-up period.
    • Pseudophakia with Irvine Gass syndrome, as indicated with Fluorescein Angiography.
    • Vitreomacular traction syndrome.
    • Other causes of macular edema (eg. CRVO, CNV, uveitis, etc).
    • Glaucoma, whether suspected or confirmed.
    • Significant media opacity.
    • Patients with ocular or periocular infections, or infection in the other eye
    • Signs of Active or resolved uveitis and intraocular inflammation.
    • Bad diabetic control as indicated by HbA1C >8.
    • Renal impairment, hepatic impairment, or congestive heart failure.
    • History of cardiovascular insult or stroke.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: The first group, Lucentis alone group
The first group received 3 monthly intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg in 0.05 mL ranibizumab alone (Lucentis, by Novartis), aspirated from vial through 5-micron sterile filter needle (19-gauge × 1-1/2 inch), with a 1-mL syringe and injected through a 30-gauge × ½ inch sterile injection needle.
Drug: Lucentis alone group
The Lucentis alone group received 3 monthly intravitreal injections of lucentis alone or less than 3 injections if the central foveal thickness reached 250 microns
Active Comparator: The second group, Lucentis dexamethasone group
The second group received monthly intravitreal injections of the same dose of ranibizumab combined with 0.4 mg in 0.1 ml dexamethasone (Dexamethasone sodium phosphate, Amriya Pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt) in a separate 1ml syringe with 27- gauge × ½ inch sterile injection needle, followed by 2 Intravitreal ranibizumab, 1 month apart (with dexamethasone if follow up OCT shows less than 10% improvement from baseline i.e., PRN).
Drug: Lucentis dexamethasone group
Lucentis dexamethasone group received intravitreal injections of combination of both lucentis and commercial dexamethasone. the second group received monthly intravitreal injections of the same dose of ranibizumab combined with 0.4 mg in 0.1 ml dexamethasone (Dexamethasone sodium phosphate, Amriya Pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt) in a separate 1ml syringe with 27- gauge × ½ inch sterile injection needle, followed by 2 Intravitreal ranibizumab, 1 month apart (with dexamethasone if follow up OCT shows less than 10% improvement from baseline i.e., PRN). Treatment was stopped when CMT improved below 250 µ.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central foveal thickness
Time Frame: 6 months after the first injection
Central foveal thickness in microns measured by OCT
6 months after the first injection
BCVA (Decimal)
Time Frame: 6 months after the first injection
Best corrected visual acuity measured on Snellen chart in Decimal form
6 months after the first injection
The number of injections
Time Frame: over 6 months duration of the study
The total number of injections in each Arm group
over 6 months duration of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IOP
Time Frame: 6 months after the first injection
Intraocular pressure
6 months after the first injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Khaled G Abueleinen, MD, PhD, Ophthalmology department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MS-278-2020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings