Comparison of the Effect of Subcutaneous Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support
Comparison of the Effect of Subcutaneous Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Intrauterine Insemination
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Bezmialem Vakif University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Absence of follicles larger than 10 mm on basal ultrasound
- Endometrial thickness less than 5 mm
- Patients with FSH<10 IU/ml, E2<60-80 pg/ml in the blood hormone test performed on the third day of the cycle and patients with antral follicle count above 7 on ultrasound
- Total motile sperm count greater than 10 million/ml
- 18-40 years old female, 18-50 years old male
- Anovulation, patients diagnosed with unexplained mild male factor infertility
- Female partners, who's BMI<25 kg/m²
- Being voluntarily
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other infertility reasons
- The patients who doesn't meet the criterias
- Refusing to attend to the research
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: subcutaneous progesterone
PROLUTEX® 25 mg Solution for injection, IBSA Group, Lugano, Switzerland
|
clinical pregnancy rates
|
|
Active Comparator: vaginal progesterone
LUTINUS® 100 mg vaginal tablets, Ferring GmbH Wittland/Kiel/Germany
|
clinical pregnancy rates
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
clinical pregnancy rate
Time Frame: day 15
|
after iui betahcg levels blood sampling
|
day 15
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ongoing pregnancy rate
Time Frame: Months 3
|
Ongoing pregnancy rates 3 months after iui
|
Months 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Gurkan Kiran, MD, Bezmialem Vakif University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S, Guler I. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
- Oktem M, Altinkaya SO, Yilmaz SA, Bozkurt N, Erdem M, Erdem A, Gumuslu S. Effect of luteal phase support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(12):909-12. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.947567. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
- Maher MA. Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jul;157(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
- Ozcan P, Takmaz T. Identification of predictive factors for the probability of pregnancy following ovulation stimulation-intra-uterine insemination cycles in terms of female and male. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Mar;47(3):893-899. doi: 10.1111/jog.14594. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
- Keskin M, Aytac R. Does Luteal Phase Support Effect Pregnancy Rates in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles? A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study in a Tertiary Center. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Aug 5;2020:6234070. doi: 10.1155/2020/6234070. eCollection 2020.
- Khosravi D, Taheripanah R, Taheripanah A, Tarighat Monfared V, Hosseini-Zijoud SM. Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesteronefor luteal support in IUI cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015 Jul;13(7):433-8.
- Green KA, Zolton JR, Schermerhorn SM, Lewis TD, Healy MW, Terry N, DeCherney AH, Hill MJ. Progesterone luteal support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):924-933.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18.10.2021-E.36477
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.