Increasing Engagement With Messages Regarding CRC Screening Among Adults Aged 45-49 (CRC45+TEXT)

November 9, 2023 updated by: Daniel M. Croymans, MD, MBA, MS, University of California, Los Angeles

Quality Improvement Study Aimed at Increasing Engagement With Messages Regarding CRC Screening Among Adults Aged 45-49 (CRC45+ TEXT).

In May of 2021, the United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) updated their colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines by recommending screening at an earlier age for average-risk adults starting at the age of 45 years old (Grade B recommendation). This is in addition to their Grade A recommendations of continuing to screen average-risk adults ages 50-75 years old. As the investigators health system aims to screen the newly eligible population of average-risk patients between the ages of 45-49, the investigators proposed randomized controlled trial is aimed to determine the most effective patient outreach approach to increase patients' engagement with messages regarding CRC screening and screening uptake within this specific age-group.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death for both men and women in the United States. One in 17 Americans will suffer from CRC during their lifetime and early detection of cancers and polyps by screening is shown to reduce CRC mortality. In 2021, the USPSTF updated its CRC screening guidelines to start screening average-risk individuals at the age of 45 years due in part to a rising incidence of CRC and premalignant polyps in younger patients.

This current study will be a nested study within a larger investigation to determine the most effective patient outreach approach to increase patients' engagement with messages regarding CRC screening and CRC screening utilization in average-risk individuals ages 45-49 years. Here the investigators are testing which type of SMS messaging is most effective in prompting people to review MyChart message regarding CRC screening and thus increasing CRC screening uptake among individuals 45-49 years old.

There will be three different text messages that have been formulated utilizing behavioral science principles, and then randomize them equally among the eligible population. There will be stratified patient randomization based on arm assignment in our 'CRC45+ Choice' evaluation to prevent cross-study contamination. The arms for this investigation will be 1) Control, 2) Risk Information and 3) Risk Information + Action. In the control (standard care) arm, patients will receive the standard SMS text message. In the Risk Information arm, patients will receive a message indicating their risk for colorectal cancer, on top of the content in the Control arm. Finally, in the Risk Information + Action arm patients will receive risk information and importance of taking quick action, on top of the content in the Control arm. The investigators will also randomly assign patients into receiving our text message on one of ten workdays, stratifying by arm assignment in both the CRC45+ Choice Evaluation and CRC45+ Text Evaluation.

We will send text reminders to patients two weeks after they receive the initial text message. Reminder content will be very similar to the content of initial text message, and differ by arm.

For this investigation the investigators hypothesize:

  1. Hyp 1: Patients assigned to the Risk Information + Action Arm (Arm 2) will have a higher click rate than patients assigned to the Control Arm (Arm 0)
  2. Hyp 2: Patients assigned to the Risk Information + Action Arm (Arm 2) will have a higher click rate than patients assigned to the Risk Information Arm (Arm 1)

Analysis: The investigators will utilize patient-level ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation, with statistical inferences based on model-robust standard errors. The primary model term will be indicator variables for arm assignment.

The analysis will adjust for sex, race/ethnicity, social vulnerability index (at the ZIP code level), and MyChart logins decile.

Treatment effects will be summarized using rate differences and 95% CI's. Exploratory analyses will investigate heterogenous treatment effects by demographic subgroups by splitting the sample into each demographic subgroup as well as by testing demographics and text message arm interactions. Sensitivity analyses will be performed without covariates, and using logistic regression models in place of linear regression models. Missing covariate values will be handled by including 'unknown' indicators, along with mean imputation for quantitative covariates.

The investigators will additionally explore how click rates within the SMS message vary with the day of the week.

Primary analyses will use intention-to-treat protocol.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20509

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Westwood, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Health Department of Medicine, Quality Office
      • Westwood, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 49 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • UCLA Health patient
  • Age 45-49 (as of 2/1/2022)
  • Active primary care provider
  • Visit within the last 3 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <45 or >50 years old at time of randomization
  • Documented family history of CRC in EMR
  • History (personal or family) of prior adenomatous polyps in the EMR
  • History of high-risk cancer syndromes (e.g., Lynch, FAP)
  • Prior CRC screening with colonoscopy or FIT
  • Inactive MyChart status at enrollment
  • No documented SMS-capable phone number

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Standard of Care
This group will receive a standard SMS text message indicating that they have a MyChart message from their provider about CRC screening and should follow a link to be screened.
Experimental: "Risk Information"
This group will receive an SMS text message highlighting their risk for CRC.
Behavioral: Risk Information
This group will receive an SMS text message highlighting their risk for CRC on top of the content in the Control arm.
Experimental: "Risk Information + Action"
This group will receive an SMS message highlighting their risk for CRC and the importance of taking quick action.
Behavioral: Risk Information + Action
This group will receive an SMS text message highlighting their risk for CRC and the importance of taking quick action, on top of the content in the Control arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opening link within SMS Text message
Time Frame: 1 week after getting the initial text message
Rate of clicking the link to MyChart within the SMS text message
1 week after getting the initial text message

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opening link within SMS Text Message
Time Frame: 1 month after getting initial text message
Rate of clicking the link to MyChart within the SMS text message during 1 month
1 month after getting initial text message
CRC45+ Choice MyChart Message opened
Time Frame: 1 month after getting the initial text message
Rate of opening MyChart message
1 month after getting the initial text message
Overall completion of any CRC screening test
Time Frame: 6 months after getting the initial text message
Rate of completion of any CRC screening (FIT Kit or Colonoscopy) within the observation window.
6 months after getting the initial text message

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Los Angeles

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Carnegie Mellon University
UCLA Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases
UCLA Department of Medicine
UCLA Anderson School of Management

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 21, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CRC45+TEXT

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Risk Information

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings