Computer Guided Versus Conventional TMJ Injection
Efficacy of Computer-guided Versus Conventional Sodium Hyaluronate Injection in Superior Joint Space in Treatment of Intra-articular TMJ Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11884
- Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with intra-articular TMJ disorder according to Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD).
- Patients who would not respond to conservative treatment as the first line of treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with polyarthritis or degenerative joint disease.
- Patients with myofascial pain.
- Previous history of minimally invasive or invasive treatment of TMJ.
- History of mandibular fracture.
- Lactating, pregnant or planning pregnancy women.
- Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or clear biocompatible photopolymer resin.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A
Patients treated with four computer-guided sodium hyaluronate injections in superior TMJ space.
|
four sodium hyaluronate injections in superior TMJ space
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B
Patients treated with four conventional sodium hyaluronate injections in superior TMJ space.
|
four sodium hyaluronate injections in superior TMJ space
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of maximum unassisted mouth opening range
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Opening range determined by asking the patient to gently open the mouth and measure the distance between upper and lower central incisor using an vernier digital electronic caliper.
Vertical movement of the mandible corrected by adding the vertical overlap.
|
6 months
|
|
Comparison of modified Helkimo's clinical dysfunction index.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
A modified version of Helkimo's clinical dysfunction index calculated to assess the TMJ dysfunction.
|
6 months
|
|
Comparison of pain intensity on Visual analog scale
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patients asked to mark their TMJ-related pain level on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "severe pain".
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total procedural time.
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Total procedural time consumed starting from application of topical antiseptic up to the end of the procedure.
|
Baseline
|
|
Patient convenience.
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Patient convenience on a scale from "0" to "10", where "0" is highly convenient and "10" extremely intolerable.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Krause M, Dorfler HM, Kruber D, Humpfner-Hierl H, Hierl T. Template-based temporomandibular joint puncturing and access in minimally invasive TMJ surgery (MITMJS) - a technical note and first clinical results. Head Face Med. 2019 Apr 2;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0194-8. Erratum In: Head Face Med. 2019 Jun 18;15(1):14.
- Steenks MH, Turp JC, de Wijer A. Reliability and Validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I in Clinical and Research Settings: A Critical Appraisal. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018 Winter;32(1):7-18. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1704.
- Rani S, Pawah S, Gola S, Bakshi M. Analysis of Helkimo index for temporomandibular disorder diagnosis in the dental students of Faridabad city: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.194941.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CG-HA-TMJ-inj.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.