Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study Investigating the Efficacy of Exparel (Liposomal Bupivacaine) for Postoperative Pain Relief in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions

June 3, 2026 updated by: John Costandi, University of Southern California
The most prevalent complaint after third molar extractions is pain. There have been many modalities and regimens developed to manage post-operative pain, such as modifications in surgical techniques, locally-applied medicaments, and oral analgesics. Recently, liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) has been FDA approved for single-dose infiltration in the oral cavity in adults and children (6 years or older) to produce extended postsurgical local anesthesia. We hypothesize that the administration of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) at the end of third molar extractions will decrease postoperative pain and decrease narcotic use for pain management.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this study, we will prospectively collect data from all patients receiving bilateral third molar extractions with Exparel versus 0.5% bupivacaine 1:200,000 epinephrine (standard bupivacaine) injections to determine the efficacy of Exparel in reducing postoperative pain. Outcomes measured will be pain intensity based on a numeric scale, date and time when pain completely subsides for each side, adverse events, use of NSAID or acetaminophen outside of prescribed pain regimen, and use of narcotics. The purpose of this research project is to evaluate the use and efficacy of Exparel in postoperative pain management in third molar extractions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
85

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90089
        • Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving bilateral mandibular third molar extractions at the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry by an oral & maxillofacial surgery resident.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to complete form for four days postoperatively.
  • Patient with severe hepatic disease
  • Patient with a history of allergy or contraindication to amide-type LA or opioids
  • Patient with recent history of antibiotic use within the past thirty days
  • Patients with use of long-acting opioids, NSAIDs, aspirin, acetaminophen within 3 days prior to screening.
  • Patients who are pregnant.
  • Patients receiving additional mandibular teeth extractions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Liposomal bupivacaine
A double-blinded randomization process will be used to preoperatively assign patient's left or right side to receive either Exparel (Liposomal bupivacaine) (39.9 mg/3 mL) or standard bupivacaine (5 mg/mL). At the end of the mandibular third molar extraction surgical procedure and at least twenty minutes following the most recent administration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (routine for this procedure), all patients will receive one side of their mandibular infiltrations with 3mL of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel).
Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine
Dosage: 3 mL Frequency: Administer via buccal infiltration technique immediately following mandibular third molar extraction surgery and at least twenty minutes following most recent lidocaine injection.
Active Comparator: 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine
A double-blinded randomization process will be used to preoperatively assign patient's left or right side to receive either Exparel (Liposomal bupivacaine) (39.9 mg/3 mL) or standard bupivacaine (5 mg/mL). At the end of the procedure and at least twenty minutes following the most recent administration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (routine for this procedure), all patients will receive one side of their mandibular infiltrations with 3mL of diluted 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine.
Drug: 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Dosage: 3 mL of diluted 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (2:1 ratio of saline to standard bupivacaine) Frequency: Administer via buccal infiltration technique immediately following mandibular third molar extraction surgery and at least twenty minutes following most recent lidocaine injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Pain
Time Frame: Mean Area under Curve Numeric rating scale scores 96 hours post-operatively
At home questionnaire with a numerical scale (0 - 10 with 0 being least amount of pain and 10 being most amount of pain), to be completed each morning and evening for four days post-operative. Then the cumulative pain rating using the numeric rating scale area under the curve over 96 hours (0 - 960 with 0 being least amount of pain over 96 hours and 960 being the most amount of pain over 96 hours), scaled at the hour-level, is calculated using the trapezoidal method in the caTools package in R, which is a sum of the averages of the numeric rating scale. A higher value is a worse outcome and lower value is a better outcome.
Mean Area under Curve Numeric rating scale scores 96 hours post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NSAID/Acetaminophen Use
Time Frame: 96 hours post-operatively
Number of Participants with NSAID/Acetaminophen Use
96 hours post-operatively
Oxycodone Use
Time Frame: 96 hours post-operatively
Number of Participants with oxycodone Use
96 hours post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Southern California

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • APP2200106

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD will be shared with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings