Cognitive Stimulation and Chemobrain. An Innovative Intervention for Cancer Survivors

June 3, 2022 updated by: Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija

Cognitive Stimulation Intervention Program for Cancer Survivors and Its Benefit on Cognitive Performance and Quality of Life

The present study aims to establish a non-pharmacological alternative in alleviating cognitive deterioration derived from undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Thus, the effectiveness of a personalized and computerized cognitive stimulation program in breast cancer survivors is assessed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A phase I/II/III clinical trial is proposed in which the first two phases will serve to evaluate the safety of the intervention and the maximum tolerated time of computerized cognitive training per session in the absence of adverse effects. The third phase will consist of a double-blind randomized controlled trial where the effectiveness of the personalized and self-administered computerized cognitive stimulation program will be evaluated.

Phase I. Based on a dose-escalation 3+3 design, experienced fatigue or adverse effects will be measured after succeeding 15 minutes cognitive stimulation training blocks. The training dose will be set to a block before extreme fatigue or notable adverse effect has been reported by two or more participants. A trained psychologist will supervise the process.

Phase II. To evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, 20 participants will undertake an interspersed training day and evaluation day through 15 consecutive days. In this way, a total of 8 evaluation sessions (day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15) and 7 cognitive stimulation sessions (day 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14) will be carried out. A trained psychologist will supervise every step of the process.

Phase III. An 8-week personalized and computerized cognitive stimulation program will be established, where the training time per session will be as determined on phase I. 120 participants will be randomized 1:1 ratio to an intervention or active control group. All participants will undertake a pre and post-test, with a total of 40 training sessions (Monday to Friday) during 8 weeks. Although this phase is set to be an online home-based stage, the responsible psychologist will be monitoring participants' performance and will periodically contact participants via telephone.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Valencia
      • Alzira, Valencia, Spain, 46600
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital La Ribera
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maria T Taberner
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Athanasious Pouptsis
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • David Collado
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Martín Núñez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have been diagnosed with breast cancer.
  • Having undergone chemotherapy.
  • Report objective or subjective complaints of cognitive impairment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastases or brain tumors.
  • Existence of a relevant medical, psychiatric, or neurological disorder.
  • Significant visual or motor impairments.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence.
  • Be receiving another cognitive stimulation intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental Group
Online games designed to target specific cognitive skills such as attention, perception, or inhibition). Activities' difficulty will be automatically adjusted accordingly to each participant's performance, always demanding a maximum cognitive effort.
Other: Personalized cognitive stimulation
Online gamified activities designed to stimulate cognitive functions (specifically executive function) will be carried out through a mobile application or web browser. Performance feedback will be shown after each activity.
Other Names:
  • CogniFit's personalized brain training
Active Comparator: Control Group
Online painting and artistic games designed not to target the specific cognitive skills at test. Activities' duration will match those of the experimental group, and its difficulty will be constant through the intervention.
Other: Sham cognitive stimulation
Non-therapeutic online games based on artistic tasks designed to not train the specific cognitive abilities at test. The time of each session will match that of the experimental group. Performance feedback will be shown after each game.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The mini-MAC is a validated 29-item self-rated questionnaire that examines five cancer-specific coping strategies: fighting spirit, helplessness, anxious preoccupation, cognitive avoidance, and fatalism. Each item is scored using a 4-point Likert scale. Higher scores on each subscale mean greater use of that strategy.
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in Cognitive Assessment for Chemo Fog Research (CAB-CF) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The CAB-CF is an online neuropsychological assessment battery that evaluates a total of 23 cognitive skills, grouped into 5 cognitive domains (attention, memory, coordination, perception, and reasoning). Each cognitive skill is scored from 0 to 800. The cognitive domain score is calculated by averaging the scores of the cognitive skills that comprise it. Higher scores mean better cognitive performance.
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Functionality Assessment Instrument in Cancer Treatment - Cognitive Function (FACT-COG) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The FACT-COG is a 37 item self-report questionnaire that assesses patients' perception of their cognitive abilities, functionality, and quality of life. Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate less perceived cognitive impairment.
Baseline and Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The STAI is a validated self-report that assesses anxiety that measures both trait and state anxiety. Each item is scored using a 4-point Likert scale. Possible scores range from 0 (no anxiety) to 60 (severe anxiety), for each category.
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The BDI-II is a validated 21-item self-report inventory designed to measure the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 (no depressive symptoms) to 63 (severe depression).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The BFI is a 9-items instrument designed to assess the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue. For the three items that assess fatigue severity, scores range from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (the worst fatigue you can imagine). For the six items that assess how fatigue interferes with daily life, scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely).
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Measuring Quality of Life | The World Health Organization - abridged version (WHOQOL-BREF) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-question questionnaire designed to measure the quality of life. It has two questions concerning the general satisfaction with health, and the remaining 24 questions are grouped in four areas: physical health, psychological health, social relations, and environment. Scores for each domain range from 0 (poor perceived quality of life) to 100 (greater perceived quality of life)
Baseline and Week 8
Change from Baseline in the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The C-SSRS is a questionnaire designed to assess the existence of thoughts, desires or behaviors related to suicidal ideation, assessing a total of ten categories (wish to be dead; non-specific active suicidal thoughts; active suicidal ideation with any methods without intent to act; active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without a specific plan; active suicidal Ideation with a specific plan and intent; preparatory acts or behavior; aborted attempt; interrupted attempt; actual attempt; completed suicide. The questionnaire can be administered as a self-report, with additional open-ended follow-up questions to provide more information. Scoring refers to the presence or absence of each of the 10 categories, provided by the dichotomous responses (Yes/No).
Baseline and Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Antonio de Nebrija

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hospital de la Ribera

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jon A Duñabeitia, Universidad Nebrija
  • Principal Investigator: Jose L Tapia, Univerisdad Nebrija

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CSCS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The data protection policy of the public health system of the Spanish government does not allow researchers to share individual participant data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Personalized cognitive stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings