A Multicenter Randomized Open-label Study of Chidamide Plus HD-DEX Versus HD-DEX in ITP

June 6, 2022 updated by: Ming Hou, Shandong University

A Multicenter Randomized Open-label Study of Chidamide Combined With High-dose Dexamethasone Versus High-dose Dexamethasone in the Management of Newly-Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia

Recently, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) has been used for their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities. It has been shown that HDACi can alleviate graft-versus-host disease by enhancing the number and function of Foxp3+ Tregs. Our group found that low-dose HDACi alleviated thrombocytopenia in both passive and active murine models of ITP. Furthermore, low-dose HDACi attenuated macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-coated platelets, stimulated production of natural Foxp3+ Tregs, promoted peripheral conversion of T cells into Tregs, and restored Treg suppressive function in vivo and in vitro. The project was undertaking by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and other 10 well-known hospitals in China. In order to report the efficacy and safety of the low dose chidamide combined with high-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in the management of ITP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with low platelet count. Low-dose HDACi alleviated thrombocytopenia in both passive and active murine models of ITP. In this multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial, newly diagnosed ITP patients will be enrolled from 11 tertiary medical centres in China. Participants will be randomly assigned into the combination group or the monotherapy group by masked statisticians in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoints are sustained response at month 6. The secondary outcomes include initial response, time to response, duration of response, bleeding score, health-related quality of life assessment, and safety issue. This study will compare the efficacy and safety of low dose chidamide combined with high-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone monotherapy in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • newly diagnosed ITP patients need of treatment(s) to minimize the risk of clinically significant bleeding primary ITP confirmed by excluding other supervened causes of thrombocytopenia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy hypertension cardiovascular disease diabetes liver and kidney function impairment HCV, HIV, HBsAg seropositive status patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Chidamide plus HD-DXM

Chidamide (orally at 5 mg biw for 24 weeks)

HD-DXM (orally at 40 mg daily for 4 days)
Drug: Chidamide
5mg po biw for 24 weeks
Drug: HD-DXM
40mg po qd for 4days
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: HD-DXM
HD-DXM (orally at 40 mg daily for 4 days )
Drug: HD-DXM
40mg po qd for 4days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained response
Time Frame: 6 month
The maintenance of platelet count ≥ 30 x 10^9/L, at least 2-fold increase of the baseline count, the absence of bleeding, and no need for rescue medication at the 6-month follow-up.
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initial response
Time Frame: day 14
CR: platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L and absence of bleeding; R: platelet count ≥ 30 × 109/L but < 100 × 109/L and a doubling from baseline and absence of bleeding.
day 14
Number of patients with bleeding
Time Frame: 6 month
Number of patients with bleeding complication. Bleeding symptoms were graded according a standardized bleeding scale specific to primary immune thrombocytopenia on the basis of site and severity of bleeding by Khellaf et al (PMID: 15951296). A modification was made to exclude age from the original scale so that only bleeding symptoms were described. Scores ranged from 0 to 59, with higher values indicating higher bleeding risk.
6 month
Number of patients with adverse events
Time Frame: 6 month
Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). At each visit, we recorded adverse events. Routine visits were scheduled once a week for the first 4 weeks and once a month thereafter.
6 month
Time to response
Time Frame: 6 month
The time from starting treatment to time of achievement of CR or R
6 month
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: 6 month
Duration of response was defined as the time from achievement of a complete response or a partial response to the loss of response (platelet count <30 × 10⁹ cells per L; measured on two occasions more than 1 day apart or the presence of bleeding).
6 month
Health-related quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 6 month
Health-related quality of life was assessed using a self-administered immune thrombocytopenia Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) at baseline and at week 12. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of life.
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shandong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 30, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ITP-Chidamide plus DEX

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings