Class I Medical Device on Post-surgical Scars

September 13, 2022 updated by: Elena Campione, University of Rome Tor Vergata

Head-to-head, Randomized Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Class I Pullulan Based Medical Device Containing Allium Cepa and Hyaluronic Acid Compared to Class I Medical Device Silicone Gel on Post-surgical Scars

To compare the effect of a class I pullulan based medical device containing Allium cepa & HA versus a class I medical device silicone gel on new post-surgical wounds

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A head-to-head, randomised, pivotal controlled trial evaluating the appearance of post-surgical scars for 12 weeks. The study was developed in 10 months, including recruitment, evaluation every 4 weeks and evaluation of the secondary objective in the third month (T2). The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the effectiveness of the class I medical device contain onion (Allium cepa) extract compared to the silicone gel used in the treatment of post-surgical scars for the prevention of hypertrophic scars. Objective scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Manchester Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), itching, redness and pliability were performed after 4,8 and 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was also evaluated by gathering adverse events related to application of the gel. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out by applying parametric or non-parametric tests depending on the distribution of the data that was going to be obtained. The one-way analysis of variance ANOVA test was used to evaluate the reduction/increase of clinical parameters in the pre-established observation times (T0, T2, T3 and T4) for each treatment, whereas comparison between treatments was performed via t-test analysis. Correlation tests were also used. The differences were considered statistically significant for p values <0.05.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
64

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Roma, Italy, 00133
        • Elena Campione
      • Rome, Italy, 00133
        • Tor Vergata Univerisity Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged between 18 and 70 who have undergone surgery for the excision of skin lesions at least 20 days before the start of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects affected by spontaneous keloids

    • Diabetic subjects with a previous history of disorders in the repair of wounds;
    • Subjects with overinfected wounds after the first week after surgery;
    • Subjects with documented sensitivity to silicone gel;
    • Subjects affected by collagen disorders (e.g. Pseudoxantoma elasticum, poikilodermatosis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: group A
class I pullulan based medical device containing Allium cepa & HA
Device: Kaloidon Plus
topical application; twice daily
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group B
class I medical device silicone gel
Device: silicone gel
topical application; twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)
Time Frame: week 4,8,12

Change of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12.

  • vascularity(range from normal(0 point) to purple(3point)
  • pigmentation(range from normal(0 point) to hyper-pigmentation(3point)
  • pliability(range from normal(0 point) to contracture(5point)
  • height (range from flat(0 point) to above 5mm(3point)
  • pain(range from none(0 point) to Require medication(2point)
  • itchiness(range from none(0 point) to Require medication(2point) We assess total score that are minimum score is 0 and maximum is 18. The lowest score means the best scar condition.
week 4,8,12
Change of Manchester Scale
Time Frame: week 4,8,12

Change of Manchester Scale from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12.

  • Color (range from perfect (1 point) to Gross mismatch (4 points)
  • Shine ( from matte (1 point) to shiny (2 points))
  • Contour ( from Flush with surrounding skin (1 point) to keloid (4 points))
  • Distortion ( from none (1 point) to severe (4 points)) Lower score denotes a better outcome using the MSS (range: 4-14).
week 4,8,12
Change of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12.
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12. Lower score denotes a better outcome using the POSAS (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12
Change of itching from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of itching from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be measure with the visual analogue scale (VAS). Lower score denotes a better outcome using the VAS (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12
Change of redness from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of redness from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be evaluted as 10 points scale, from normal (1 point) to purple (10 points). Lower score denotes a better outcome (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12
Change of pliability from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of pliability from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be measured by testing folding of the scar with a six-step scale: normal, supple, yielding, firm, banding, and contracture. Lower score denotes a better outcome (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events occurrence after treatment
Time Frame: week 12
Incidence of adverse events will be evaluated since the baseline visit until 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. Adverse Events reported by patients or noticed by investigator will be reported as local skin reactions.
week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rome Tor Vergata

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 10, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R.S. 211.19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings