Class I Medical Device on Post-surgical Scars

September 13, 2022 updated by: Elena Campione, University of Rome Tor Vergata

Head-to-head, Randomized Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Class I Pullulan Based Medical Device Containing Allium Cepa and Hyaluronic Acid Compared to Class I Medical Device Silicone Gel on Post-surgical Scars

To compare the effect of a class I pullulan based medical device containing Allium cepa & HA versus a class I medical device silicone gel on new post-surgical wounds

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A head-to-head, randomised, pivotal controlled trial evaluating the appearance of post-surgical scars for 12 weeks. The study was developed in 10 months, including recruitment, evaluation every 4 weeks and evaluation of the secondary objective in the third month (T2). The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the effectiveness of the class I medical device contain onion (Allium cepa) extract compared to the silicone gel used in the treatment of post-surgical scars for the prevention of hypertrophic scars. Objective scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Manchester Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), itching, redness and pliability were performed after 4,8 and 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was also evaluated by gathering adverse events related to application of the gel. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out by applying parametric or non-parametric tests depending on the distribution of the data that was going to be obtained. The one-way analysis of variance ANOVA test was used to evaluate the reduction/increase of clinical parameters in the pre-established observation times (T0, T2, T3 and T4) for each treatment, whereas comparison between treatments was performed via t-test analysis. Correlation tests were also used. The differences were considered statistically significant for p values <0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Roma, Italy, 00133
        • Elena Campione
      • Rome, Italy, 00133
        • Tor Vergata Univerisity Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged between 18 and 70 who have undergone surgery for the excision of skin lesions at least 20 days before the start of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects affected by spontaneous keloids

    • Diabetic subjects with a previous history of disorders in the repair of wounds;
    • Subjects with overinfected wounds after the first week after surgery;
    • Subjects with documented sensitivity to silicone gel;
    • Subjects affected by collagen disorders (e.g. Pseudoxantoma elasticum, poikilodermatosis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: group A
class I pullulan based medical device containing Allium cepa & HA
topical application; twice daily
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group B
class I medical device silicone gel
topical application; twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)
Time Frame: week 4,8,12

Change of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12.

  • vascularity(range from normal(0 point) to purple(3point)
  • pigmentation(range from normal(0 point) to hyper-pigmentation(3point)
  • pliability(range from normal(0 point) to contracture(5point)
  • height (range from flat(0 point) to above 5mm(3point)
  • pain(range from none(0 point) to Require medication(2point)
  • itchiness(range from none(0 point) to Require medication(2point) We assess total score that are minimum score is 0 and maximum is 18. The lowest score means the best scar condition.
week 4,8,12
Change of Manchester Scale
Time Frame: week 4,8,12

Change of Manchester Scale from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12.

  • Color (range from perfect (1 point) to Gross mismatch (4 points)
  • Shine ( from matte (1 point) to shiny (2 points))
  • Contour ( from Flush with surrounding skin (1 point) to keloid (4 points))
  • Distortion ( from none (1 point) to severe (4 points)) Lower score denotes a better outcome using the MSS (range: 4-14).
week 4,8,12
Change of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12.
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12. Lower score denotes a better outcome using the POSAS (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12
Change of itching from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of itching from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be measure with the visual analogue scale (VAS). Lower score denotes a better outcome using the VAS (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12
Change of redness from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of redness from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be evaluted as 10 points scale, from normal (1 point) to purple (10 points). Lower score denotes a better outcome (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12
Change of pliability from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12
Time Frame: week 4,8,12
Change of pliability from baseline to weeks 4,8 and 12 will be measured by testing folding of the scar with a six-step scale: normal, supple, yielding, firm, banding, and contracture. Lower score denotes a better outcome (range: 0-10).
week 4,8,12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events occurrence after treatment
Time Frame: week 12
Incidence of adverse events will be evaluated since the baseline visit until 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. Adverse Events reported by patients or noticed by investigator will be reported as local skin reactions.
week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 10, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cicatrix

Clinical Trials on Kaloidon Plus

Subscribe