Acute Recording of Stereotyped High-Frequency Oscillations

March 19, 2026 updated by: Nuri F. Ince, Mayo Clinic

Acute Recording of Stereotyped High-Frequency Oscillations With a Closed-Loop Brain Interchange System in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Overall, this study will investigate the functional utility of stereotyped HFOs by capturing them with a new implantable system (Brain Interchange - BIC of CorTec), which can sample neural data at higher rates >=1kHz and deliver targeted electrical stimulation to achieve seizure control. In contrast to current closed-loop systems (RNS), which wait for the seizure to start before delivering stimulation, the BIC system will monitor the spatial topography and rate of stereotyped HFOs and deliver targeted stimulation to these HFO generating areas to prevent seizures from occurring. If the outcomes of our research in an acute setting become successful, the investigators will execute a clinical trial and run the developed methods with the implantable BIC system in a chronic ambulatory setting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) of intracranial EEG (iEEG) have the potential to identify the surgical resection area/seizure onset zone (SOZ) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, multiple reports indicate that HFOs can be generated not only by epileptic cerebral tissue but also by non-epileptic sites often including eloquent regions such as motor, visual, and language cortices. In this project, the initial evidence of a recurrent waveform pattern is presented that may be sufficient to distinguish pathological HFOs from physiological ones. Specifically, the investigators show that the SOZ repeatedly generates sets of stereotypical HFOs with similar waveform morphology whereas the events recorded from out of SOZ were irregular. This morphological pattern served as a robust neurobiomarker to isolate SOZ from other brain areas in multiple patients consistently. While these promising preliminary results are in place, the functional utility of stereotyped HFOs in a closed-loop seizure control system remains unknown. As of today, not much is known whether the stereotyped HFOs generated by the SOZ can be detected with an implantable system. If this can be achieved, then HFOs can be strategically translated as a neurobiomarker into closed-loop seizure control applications. The investigators hypothesize that pathologic stereotyped HFOs can be captured with the implantable Brain Interchange (BIC) system of CorTec and spatial topography of these events can be utilized by the implantable system to deliver targeted electrical stimulation to achieve seizure control. Using an acute setup within the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), this project will investigate the feasibility of capturing stereotyped HFO events using the new BIC system and compare the detection results to those obtained with the commercially available amplifier (Aim-1). If the first phase (Aim-1) of the study becomes successful, later in the second phase (Aim-2), once again in the EMU, the investigators will deliver targeted electrical stimulation to those brain sites associated with stereotyped HFOs using the BIC.

During the entire study, the BIC system will not be implanted but used externally to assess the neural data through externalized electrodes and then deliver closed-loop stimulation. If the outcomes of the research in an acute setting become successful, the investigators will execute a clinical trial and run our methods with the implanted BIC system in a chronic ambulatory setting.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-3498
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with medically refractory epilepsy, who have been deemed appropriate candidates for intracranial EEG monitoring
  • Adult men and women (18≤ age <70 years)
  • children (3≤ age <18 years)
  • includes women and minorities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be excluded if their condition makes them unable to continue with recordings.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Epilepsy
patients with drug resistant epilepsy undergoing a surgical evaluation in the epilepsy monitoring unit
Device: Brain Interchange System
The CorTec Brain Interchange (BIC) is an implantable system with sensing and stimulation capability dedicated to promoting brain computer interface and closed-loop neuromodulation research. It is an externally powered implant which can provide neural data to a nearby computing station (communication unit connected to a personal computer) continuously. In return, computing station controls the implant e.g. for generating therapeutic electrical stimulation to the brain. It is expected that BIC will catalyze translational applications of electroceuticals in human subject by making the neural data immediately available as well as permit the investigation of novel closed-loop neuromodulation applications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Robustness in Data Transmission
Time Frame: Over 24 hours within the first year of project
Outcome-1 will quantify the feasibility of robust data recording and transmission with the BIC system in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). The investigators will develop software tools to communicate with the BIC directly from MATLAB and Simulink. The incoming data from the implantable system will be visualized with gHIsys, the high-speed data processing libraries of gTec. At the end of the first year, in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), the investigators will test the feasibility of recoding iEEG data from 2 patients continuously over 24 hours with less than <5% data loss. The BIC system will not be implanted but used externally to record the neural data. The research team will also test to record iEEG/ECoG data simultaneously with 2 BIC units to be ready for those cases where the number of recording channels are larger than =>32 and <=64. At this stage Outcome-1 is only related to the device feasibility (robust data transmission) not health related outcome.
Over 24 hours within the first year of project
Feasibility of Detection of Stereotyped HFOs
Time Frame: Within the first 3 years of the project
Outcome-2 will test the feasibility of capturing stereotyped HFO (sHFO) with the BIC system in the EMU setting. Once the feasibility of robust data transmission as listed in (Outcome-1) is tested, the neural activity will be recorded over 24 hours using the BIC system from 10 patients. The hardware will not be implanted but used externally to record the neural data. Then, the research team will compare whether the sHFO detection and SOZ localization accuracy is significantly different between the BIC and FDA approved amplifier. If the investigators can detect stereotyped HFOs with a rate not less than 75% of FDA approved clinical amplifier and predict the SOZ in 8/10 patients, then the research team will move to the second phase of the project to test Outcome-3. Outcome-2 tests the feasibility of capturing relevant neural events with the external BIC system and compares the recording quality to the FDA approved amplifiers. Outcome-2 does not test any health-related outcome.
Within the first 3 years of the project

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Baylor College of Medicine
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CorTec GmbH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 23-008859
  • 1UH3NS117944-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Intracranial EEG + ECoG recorded from patients with epilepsy will be shared. The electrical signs of neural activity will be collected in the EMU for 24hrs. One stream of data will be digitized at 1kHz with 16bit resolution with the BIC system and the other stream with least a 2 kHz sampling frequency to capture HFOs reaching up to 500Hz.

All collected data will be de-identified prior to data exchange. Patient data will be provided in a coded format that protects patient identities but will contain diagnosis (signs/symptoms), interventions including technical observations, diagnostic tests/results, and patient outcomes.

Information about the recording device including device serial numbers, device model numbers, date of the event, and country/state of the event will be annotated with the data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Every 6 months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data Archive for the BRAIN Initiative (DABI) - invasive human neurophysiology (including EEG, ECoG, LFP, single unit)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Brain Interchange System

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings