Bioinductive Patch for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

February 24, 2026 updated by: Stephanie Muh, MD, Henry Ford Health System

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Augmented With Bioinductive Implant for Full-Thickness Tears: A Randomized Controlled Study

The purpose of this randomized-controlled study is to compare outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with a Bioinductive Implant (study group) to standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (control group). The primary outcome of this study is rotator cuff repair integrity (absence of full- or partial-thickness defect) demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that the study group will have higher rates of repair integrity demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A bioinductive patch is an implant that may foster tendon regrowth and healing following surgery. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: control and investigational. All surgical patients will have failed non-surgical/conservative options for 6 weeks. Patients in the "control group" will receive the standard surgery (arthroscopic rotator cuff repair) . Patients in the "experimental group" will receive the same surgical treatment, with the addition of the bioinductive patch. This patch will be implanted during surgery. Then, using a combination of ultrasound studies and other measures, the investigators will assess how well the patch works compared to surgery alone.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
78

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Stephanie J Muh, MD

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Recruiting
        • Henry Ford Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephanie J Muh, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indicated and scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
  • Full-thickness medium (1-3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons demonstrated on magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging.
  • Chronic, degenerative rotator cuff tears.
  • Ability to read and understand English.
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Patient failed ≥6 weeks of conservative treatment, which included structured, in-person physical therapy or documented home therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient scheduled for open or mini-open rotator cuff repair
  • Prior surgery of affected shoulder (except diagnostic arthroscopy)
  • Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears
  • Small (<1 cm) rotator cuff tears
  • Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon
  • Acute and traumatic rotator cuff tears
  • Active infection
  • Cancer
  • Autoimmune and rheumatologic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control Group
Surgical treatment alone, consisting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.
Procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
This procedure is the standard of care for rotator cuff tears who fail conservative treatment options.
Diagnostic test: Ultrasound Imaging
An ultrasound will be performed on each patient one year postoperatively.
Experimental: Study Group
Identical surgical treatment as control group plus bio-inductive patch implant. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.
Procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
This procedure is the standard of care for rotator cuff tears who fail conservative treatment options.
Diagnostic test: Ultrasound Imaging
An ultrasound will be performed on each patient one year postoperatively.
Biological: Bioinductive implant
A bioinductive implant that is designed to promote healing of the torn rotator cuff tendon after surgery.
Other Names:
  • Bioinductive patch

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rotator cuff repair integrity
Time Frame: Preoperative to 1 year postoperative
absence of full- or partial-thickness defect as demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.
Preoperative to 1 year postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: Intraoperative to 2 years postoperative
Both intra- and postoperative complications will be collected.
Intraoperative to 2 years postoperative
PROMs scores for upper extremity function
Time Frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity function. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 0 - 100-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 0 representing the minimum, and 100 representing the maximum function.
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
PROMs scores for depression
Time Frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for depression. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher increased depression (worse).
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
PROMs scores for upper extremity pain interference
Time Frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity pain and how it interferes with the patients daily life. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher pain interference (worse).
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Shoulder Range of Motion
Time Frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Standard range of motion values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Shoulder Strength
Time Frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Standard shoulder strength values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits. Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale will be used to measure the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale with 0 being the minimum and 5 being the maximum. Higher scores are better/normal.
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Reoperation
Time Frame: 2 years postoperative
Whether or not patients required another operation.
2 years postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Henry Ford Health System

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie J Muh, MC, Henry Ford Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15702

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings