Prospective Evaluation of the Specificity of Serological Tests for Human African Trypanosomiasis (SpeSerTryp)

April 4, 2024 updated by: Veerle Lejon, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement

Prospective Evaluation of the Specificity of Serological Tests for Human African Trypanosomiasis in Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea

This study evaluates and compares the diagnostic specificity of 5 serological field tests for screening of the population at risk for human African trypanosomiasis due to Trypanosoma brucei gambiense.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the last decade, the prevalence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Tbg) human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) has fallen and HAT has been targeted for transmission interruption by 2030. To achieve this goal, disease surveillance remains essential and is based on the identification of cases after screening carried out in the field with a serological test.

The SpeSerTryp study is a prospective evaluation of the specificity of serological field tests for the diagnosis of HAT in Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea. Since the prevalence of HAT is low in these countries, sensitivity will not be assessed.

The main objective is to evaluate and compare the specificity of 5 serological field tests: Bioline HAT 2.0 (Abbott, South Korea), HAT Sero-K-SeT & HAT 2.0 Sero-K-SeT (Coris BioConcept, Belgium ), TDR DCN (USA), and the CATT/T.b. gambiense (Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Belgium). The secondary objectives are: 1° to assess the specificity of the 5 serological field tests according to malaria status; and 2° to compare the performance of immunological laboratory tests (trypanolysis, ELISA/T.b.gambiense, g-iELISA) and molecular laboratory tests (Trypanozoon RT-qPCR multiplex, SNP RT-qPCR and SHERLOCK) as reference tests to differentiate false positive subjects to serological field tests from subjects who had contact with Tbg. Specificity values will be determined against a composite reference test consisting of the most sensitive HAT parasitological methods. SpeSerTryp is a prospective study that will take place in the endemic health districts of Bonon and Sinfra in Côte d'Ivoire and in the endemic health districts of Forécariah, Dubréka and Boffa in Guinea. In each country, 500 participants will be actively recruited by mobile teams. The inclusion criteria are: Age greater than or equal to 10 years and obtaining signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria are: Severe anemia preventing blood sampling; serious illness preventing the obtaining of informed consent and participation in the study; or history of HAT. After obtaining informed consent, a venous blood sample will be taken (6 mL). This specimen will be used to carry out the 5 serological tests for HAT, the RDT for malaria, and for participants with at least one of the 5 serological tests positive, parasitological confirmation of HAT and molecular and immunological laboratory tests . The duration of participant recruitment is estimated to be around 30 days, while laboratory analyses will take about 6 months. HAT cases identified during the study will be treated in accordance with current national guidelines.

This study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, ICH-BPC E6/R2 guidelines, and all national legal and regulatory requirements.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1095

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Côte D'Ivoire
      • Bonon, Côte D'Ivoire
        • Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé de Daloa
  • Guinea
      • Dubréka, Guinea
        • Programme Nationale de Lutte contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine, Ministère de Santé, Division Prévention et Lutte contre la Maladie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 10 years old
  • signed the informed consent form (in case of minor: parent or tutor signs informed consent form and minor signs ascent form)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe anemia hindering blood sampling
  • severe illness hindering obtention of informed consent (eg coma, cognitive deficiency etc)
  • history of sleeping sickness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: participant
All eligible participants will undergo 5 serological field tests for HAT and a malaria test. Those testing positive in at least 1 serological field test will undergo parasitology to confirm HAT and immunological and molecular laboratory tests
Diagnostic test: Serological field test for HAT
Whole blood is tested by lateral flow or agglutination (CATT) for the presence of trypanosome specific antibody. Participants testing positive for at least one of these tests will undergo microscopic examination to detect trypanosomes (lymph, mAECT on blood) and DBS will be prepared for immunological and molecular laboratory testing.
Other Names:
  • Bioline HAT 2.0 (Abbott, South Korea), HAT Sero-K-SeT (Coris BioConcept, Belgium), HAT 2.0 Sero-K-SeT (Coris BioConcept, Belgium), RDT DCN (USA), CATT/Tb gambiense (ITM Antwerp, Belgium)
Diagnostic test: malaria rapid test
RDT detecting HRP2 plasmodium antigen.
Diagnostic test: Immunologic laboratory tests
Laboratory tests detecting trypanosoma brucei gambiense specific (VSG) antibodies in DBS. These tests will only be carried out on participants that are positive in at least on of the rapid serological tests
Other Names:
  • trypanolysis, ELISA/T.b.gambiense, g-iELISA
Diagnostic test: Molecular laboratory tests
Laboratory tests detecting Trypanozoon specific nucleic acids. These tests will only be carried out on participants that are positive in at least on of the rapid serological tests
Other Names:
  • Trypanozoon RT-qPCR multiplex, SNP RT-qPCR, SHERLOCK

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity of serological field test for diagnosis of HAT during active screening in Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea
Time Frame: 1 month
Index tests: Bioline HAT 2.0 (Abbott, South Korea), HAT Sero-K-SeT (Coris BioConcept, Belgium), HAT 2.0 Sero-K-SeT (Coris BioConcept, Belgium), RDT DCN (USA), CATT/Tb gambiense (ITM Antwerp, Belgium). Reference test: parasitological confirmation by combined lymph and blood (mAECT) examination
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity of serological field test for diagnosis of HAT during active screening in Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea, in function of malaria status
Time Frame: 1 month
Index tests: Bioline HAT 2.0 (Abbott, South Korea), HAT Sero-K-SeT (Coris BioConcept, Belgium), HAT 2.0 Sero-K-SeT (Coris BioConcept, Belgium), RDT DCN (USA), CATT/Tb gambiense (ITM Antwerp, Belgium). Reference test: parasitological confirmation by combined lymph and blood (mAECT) examination. The malaria status will be determined using an RDT detecting HRP2
1 month
Specificity of immunologic and molecular laboratory tests for diagnosis of HAT in serological suspects
Time Frame: 1 year
Index tests: trypanolysis, ELISA/T.b.gambiense, g-iELISA, Trypanozoon RT-qPCR multiplex, SNP RT-qPCR, SHERLOCK. Reference test: parasitological confirmation by combined lymph and blood (mAECT) examination.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
Programme National de lutte contre la THA, Guinée
Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé, Daloa
Institut Pasteur, Guinée
Institut Pierre Richet, Guinée

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Martial N'Djetchi Kassi, Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé de Daloa
  • Principal Investigator: Oumou Camara, Programme National de lutte contre de la THA en Guinée

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SpeSerTryp

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

As part of the open data policy (FAIR data), the final database of the study will be deposited in the IRD's institutional depository "DataSud" and will be identified by a DOI. Metadata describing the database will be under open access. The database itself, containing personal health data, may be considered "sensitive", and will be under controlled access by a data access committee which will assess specific requests for data use. The partners who generated the data will remain the owners of the data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data are estimated to be deposited about 1 year after the start of recruitment. Data will remain available as long as the study is showcased on datasud

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Metadata will be public. Personal health data, may be considered "sensitive", will be under controlled access by a data access committee which will assess specific requests for data use.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings