Efficacy and Safety of ALSS Treatment for ICIs-LF in Patients With HCC

November 26, 2024 updated by: Wenxiong Xu, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Efficacy and Safety of Artificial Liver Support System Treatment for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Related Liver Failure in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of artificial liver support system treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitors related liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are commonly used for advanced stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years. The incident rate of Grade 4 immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced immune mediated hepatitis reaches 14.5%. Since these patients usually develop into liver failure, it is urgent to find out a more suitable therapy. Artificial liver support system (ALSS) treatment has been proved to effectively control both immune mediated hepatitis and liver failure, it may be a new therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced liver failure (ICIs-LF) in patients with HCC. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ALSS treatment, including the classic mode of plasma exchange (PE) and new combination mode of double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) with sequential low-dose plasma exchange (LPE), for ICIs-LF in patients with HCC. Sixty patients with HCC and ICIs-LF will be enrolled in this study. The participants are randomly divided into trial group (DPMAS+LPE, and comprehensive internal medical treatment) and control group (PE and comprehensive internal medical treatment). Symptoms, signs, laboratory tests results, adverse events, mortality rates are recorded from treatment baseline to 12 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510630
        • Recruiting
        • Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age from 18 to 65 years old;
  2. Clinical diagnosis of chronic hepatitis b virus infection (positive hepatitis b surface antigen or positive hepatitis b virus DNA > 0.5 year);
  3. Clinical diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and receive immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment. The last treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors is less than three months from inclusion;
  4. The level of hepatitis b virus DNA < 2000 IU/mL；
  5. Serum aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase > 20 times upper limit of normal；serum total bilirubin>10 times upper limit of normal；
  6. Prothrombin time international ratio > 1.5;
  7. Platelets > 50*10 E9/L;
  8. Without intrahepatic bile duct dilation due to tumor progression.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other active liver diseases;
  2. Other malignancy;
  3. Pregnancy or lactation;
  4. Human immunodeficiency virus infection or congenital immune deficiency diseases;
  5. Severe diabetes, autoimmune diseases; unstable infarction due to cardio-cerebrovascular events; other important organ dysfunctions or transplantation;
  6. Active bleeding, disseminated intravascular coagulation, thrombosis, or thrombotic disease;
  7. Patients received artificial liver support system treatment in one week before inclusion;
  8. Patients can not follow-up;
  9. Investigator considering inappropriate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: DPMAS+LPE group
30 patients receive treatment of DPMAS, LPE, and comprehensive internal medical treatment.
Other: DPMAS+LPE
Patients will receive treatment of double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) and low volume plasma exchange (LPE) for three times in two weeks. The volume of plasma adsorption in DPMAS is 5000~6000 millilitre. The volume of fresh frozen plasma used in LPE is 1000 millilitre.
Other: Comprehensive internal medical treatment
Patients will receive comprehensive internal medical treatment.
Active Comparator: PE group
30 patients receive treatment of PE and comprehensive internal medical treatment.
Other: Comprehensive internal medical treatment
Patients will receive comprehensive internal medical treatment.
Other: PE
Patients will receive treatment of plasma exchange (PE) for three times in two weeks. The volume of fresh frozen plasma used in PE is 2000 millilitre.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Mortality rate at 12-week follow-up.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score variation
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Variation of MELD score at 12 weeks after treatment. MELD score = 9.57 × loge(creatinine mg/dl) + 3.78 × loge(TBIL mg/dl) + 11.20 × loge(PT-INR) + 6.43.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wenxiong Xu, Doctor, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • XWX4

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol, results and conclusions of this clinical trial will be published at academic conferences or in journals.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Proposals should be directed to xuwenx@mail.sysu.edu.cn. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings