Epione® Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study (SaFE)
Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study of a Robotic Device for Image Guided Percutaneous Needle Placement in the Abdomen
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The objective of this PMCF study is to compile data on the routine use of the EPIONE® device in subjects undergoing CT-guided percutaneous procedures in the abdomen.
The objectives are:
- to evaluate the technical success of the device
- to evaluate performance parameters (accuracy measures, adjustements, post-intervention ablation success, local tumor recurrence, operator satisfaction) and the safety of the device
55 patients are planned in this post-market study.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Laetitia Messner
- Phone Number: +33(0)448194050
- Email: clinical.department@quantumsurgical.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Villejuif, France, 94000
- Gustave Roussy Institut
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient >18 years old,
- Patient for whom a CT-guided procedure in abdomen has been prescribed and agreed by a multidisciplinary team of radiologists, surgeons and clinicians,
- Patient with a confirmed non-opposition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient unable to undergo general anesthesia,
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Intervention with the EPIONE® device
Patients treated by percutaneous CT-guided procedures in the abdomen with the EPIONE® device
|
The EPIONE device is a user controlled, stereotactic accessory intended to assist in the planning and manual advancement of one or more instruments, as well as in verification of instrument position during Computed Tomography (CT) guided percutaneous procedures.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Technical Success
Time Frame: Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
Number of targets reached ; the target is considered to have been reached when the needle is positioned accurately enough to allow the planned procedure to be performed (by patient)
|
Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
|
Technical Success
Time Frame: Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
Number of targets reached ; the target is considered to have been reached when the needle is positioned accurately enough to allow the planned procedure to be performed (by lesion)
|
Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Needle Placement Accuracy
Time Frame: Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
accuracy of the needle placement: deviation between the planned and actual needle position once inserted
|
Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
|
Number and Nature of Needle Adjustments to Reach the Target
Time Frame: Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
Detail of the number/nature of adjustments performed after the initial insertion of the needle
|
Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
|
Post-intervention Ablation Success
Time Frame: Until Visit 4 - Routine FU visit at 10 months
|
Minimal Ablation Margin(s) measure(s) if applicable (mm)
|
Until Visit 4 - Routine FU visit at 10 months
|
|
Local Tumor Recurrence
Time Frame: Until Visit 4 - Routine FU visit at 10 months
|
Evaluation of the local tumor progression following the ablation (if applicable)
|
Until Visit 4 - Routine FU visit at 10 months
|
|
Operator Satisfaction
Time Frame: Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
5-point Likert scale: very Dissatisfied/dissatisfied/neutral/satisfied/highly satisfied
|
Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
|
Adverse Events Related to Device or Procedure
Time Frame: Until Visit 4 - Routine FU visit at 10 months
|
Safety of the device
|
Until Visit 4 - Routine FU visit at 10 months
|
|
Device Dysfunction
Time Frame: Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
Evaluation of the device dysfunction
|
Visit 2 - D0 The day of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Baptiste BONNET, MD, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- QS-NIS-G-H-2101
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.