Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Cardiac Dysfunction and AV Block
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) in Patients With Cardiac Dysfunction and AV Block
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Weijian Huang, MD
- Phone Number: +86138-0669-1086
- Email: weijianhuang69@126.com
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
- First Affliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Above 18 years old
- Agree to participate in trial and sign informed consent
- NYHA cardiac function class I-III
- LVEF<50%
- Second or complete atrioventricular block with pacing indication or ventricular pacing dependent with ventricular pacing percentage >40%
- Patients who are willing to take the de-novo implant or device replacement or upgrade.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy <1 year
- Patients with severe tricuspid valvular disease1 or who have undergone mechanical valve or bioprosthetic valve surgery
- Acute myocardial infarction within 1 month
- Women of childbearing age who are pregnant or becoming pregnant during the study period
- Severe liver and kidney dysfunction2
- Have been enrolled in another clinical studies that may interferes with the current trial objectives
- Evidence of severe pulmonary hypertension (PASP>70mmHg)
- Evidence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which shall affect the prognosis of patients.
- The investigator believes that subject's physical condition is not suitable for participation in the trial
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: LBBP Treatment
Patients were performed left bundle branch pacing by a single/dual chamber pacemaker or dual chamber ICD device
|
Left bundle branch pacing by a single/dual chamber pacemaker or dual chamber ICD device through the pacing lead at left bundle branch region
Bi-ventricular pacing by a CRT/CRTD device
|
|
Active Comparator: BVP Treatment
Patients were performed bi-ventricular pacing by a CRT/CRTD device
|
Left bundle branch pacing by a single/dual chamber pacemaker or dual chamber ICD device through the pacing lead at left bundle branch region
Bi-ventricular pacing by a CRT/CRTD device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of LVEF
Time Frame: 12 months
|
To compare the effects of LBBP Treatment Group and CRT Treatment Group on target subjects by analyzing the LVEF within 12 months post-implant.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of LVESV
Time Frame: 12 months
|
To demonstrate and compare the LVESV at 12 month post-implant.
|
12 months
|
|
successful rate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
To characterize the successful rate of LBBP Procedure and CRT Procedure among randomized patients' group.
|
12 months
|
|
mortality and heart failure hospitalization rate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
To demonstrate and compare the mortality and heart failure hospitalization rate between LBBP and CRT treatment group 12 month post-implant
|
12 months
|
|
occurrence of serious complication associated with LBBP procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
|
To characterize occurrence of serious complication associated with LBBP procedure within 12 month post-implant.
|
12 months
|
|
QRS width between LBBP and CRT
Time Frame: 12 months
|
To characterize and compare the QRS width between LBBP and CRT treatment groups during the baseline, preoperative, postoperative and follow up visits within 3 months and 12 month post-implant.
|
12 months
|
|
incidence and severity of tricuspid regurgitation
Time Frame: 12 months
|
To assess and compare the incidence and severity of tricuspid regurgitation between LBBP and CRT treatment groups within 12 month post-implant
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FirstWenzhouMU216-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.