Preservation of Spontaneous Breathing in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery
Comparison of Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined Laryngeal Mask Airway With Preservation of Spontaneous Breathing Versus General Anesthesia Using Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery:
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China, 212002
- Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 18-69 years old
- Body mass index (BMI) was 18-24 kg / m2
- American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical classification class I-II
- The preoperative pulmonary function was normal
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cardiopulmonary disease
- Severe nervous system diseases
- Severe blood system diseases
- Severe liver and kidney dysfunction
- Conversion to thoracotomy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: spontaneous breathing anesthesia non-intubation group
In this group all the patients with spontaneous breathing anesthesia
|
non-intubation group, thoracic paravertebral nerve block was performed before anesthesia induction,when the BIS value drops to between 40 and 60, laryngeal mask airway(LMA) is placed,and observation of breathing
|
|
No Intervention: general anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation group
In this group all the patients with tradition anesthesia with double-lumen endotracheal intubation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the hospitalized stay
Time Frame: 1 year
|
the hospitalized stay
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual analogue score (VAS) after operation;
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Visual analogue score (VAS) was compared between the two groups
|
1 year
|
|
The postoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 year
|
postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV), pulmonary infection, atelectasis, sore throat, hoarseness
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: sun caixia, doctor, Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zheng H, Hu XF, Jiang GN, Ding JA, Zhu YM. Nonintubated-Awake Anesthesia for Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Procedures. Thorac Surg Clin. 2017 Nov;27(4):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2017.06.008.
- Hung WT, Cheng YJ, Chen JS. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in Nonintubated Anesthesia. Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Feb;30(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.09.002.
- AlGhamdi ZM, Lynhiavu L, Moon YK, Moon MH, Ahn S, Kim Y, Sung SW. Comparison of non-intubated versus intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(7):4236-4243. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.163.
- Kocaturk C, Kutluk AC, Usluer O, Onat S, Cinar HU, Yanik F, Cesur E, Ulku R, Karamustafaoglu A, Celik B, Demirhan R, Kalafat CE, Ozpolat B. Comparison of awake and intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: A prospective multicenter randomized trial. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019 Oct 23;27(4):550-556. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.18214. eCollection 2019 Oct.
- Senturk JC, Kristo G, Gold J, Bleday R, Whang E. The Development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Across Surgical Specialties. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):863-870. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0317. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
- Guo Z, Shao W, Yin W, Chen H, Zhang X, Dong Q, Liang L, Wang W, Peng G, He J. Analysis of feasibility and safety of complete video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of anatomic pulmonary segments under non-intubated anesthesia. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jan;6(1):37-44. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.01.06.
- Gonzalez M, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Perentes JY, Doucet V, Zellweger M, Marcucci C, Ris HB, Krueger T, Gronchi F. An enhanced recovery after surgery program for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery anatomical lung resections is cost-effective. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(10):5879-5888. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.100.
- Krediet AC, Moayeri N, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, Renes S, Bigeleisen PE, Groen GJ. Different Approaches to Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block: An Illustrated Review. Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):459-74. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000747.
- Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
- Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
- Shen C, Che G. Tubeless minimally invasive treatment: taking a new step in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Thorac Cancer. 2019 Nov;10(11):2067-2070. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13206. Epub 2019 Oct 7. No abstract available.
- Liu J, Cui F, Li S, Chen H, Shao W, Liang L, Yin W, Lin Y, He J. Nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under epidural anesthesia compared with conventional anesthetic option: a randomized control study. Surg Innov. 2015 Apr;22(2):123-30. doi: 10.1177/1553350614531662. Epub 2014 May 12.
- Huang QW, Li JB, Huang Y, Zhang WQ, Lu ZW. A Comparison of Analgesia After a Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Operation with a Sustained Epidural Block and a Sustained Paravertebral Block: A Randomized Controlled Study. Adv Ther. 2020 Sep;37(9):4000-4014. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01446-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
- Chen N, Qiao Q, Chen R, Xu Q, Zhang Y, Tian Y. The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block, single-injection erector spinae plane block and multiple-injection paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
- El-Boghdadly K, Madjdpour C, Chin KJ. Thoracic paravertebral blocks in abdominal surgery - a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):297-308. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew269.
- Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):842-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq265. Epub 2010 Oct 14. Erratum In: Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):522.
- Janik M, Juhos P, Lucenic M, Tarabova K. Non-intubated Thoracoscopic Surgery-Pros and Cons. Front Surg. 2021 Dec 6;8:801718. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.801718. eCollection 2021.
- Qi L, Chen K, Luo B, Mao G, Pan L, Huang H, Li J, Chen S. Clinical application of preserving spontaneous breathing non-intubation anesthesia in thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer under ERAS concept. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct;18(5):e329-e337. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13726. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
- Cai LS, Hou B, Jin H, Bo Y, Chen XL, Dai J, Yang T, Lan BS, Ye J, Peng H, Peng J. Clinical evaluation of the rapid recovery of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery under non-intubated anesthesia. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(24):1783. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6434.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Y2021017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.