Small-diameter Closed Thoracic Drainage Tube Fixation Method
Design and Application of Small-diameter Closed Thoracic Drainage Tube Fixation Following Lung Wedge Resection: a Randomised Prospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Taizhou, Zhejiang, China, 317000
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Single-port thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung was performed for the first time
- No air leak in the lung tissue was detected
- The patient could communicate and cooperate normally.
- No local skin allergy or scar could be observed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with wide adhesion of the whole thoracic mucosa.
- Patients with postoperative or intraoperative bleeding.
- Patients with severe postoperative hypoproteinaemia or chylothorax with massive pleural effusion.
- Patients diagnosed with emphysema.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: The drainage tube in the experimental group was fixed with the triple-buffer system
|
The steps were as follows: i) elastic cotton tape (3M 2733-25 Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used at the proximal 15 cm from the incision, with 5 × 2.5 cm pieces glued to the skin and fixed with the drainage tube using surgical knots; ii) the distal end of the ligation was fixed using the same method, while the ligation position was higher than the first; iii) the ligature point was fixed next to the elastic soft cotton tape (5 × 5 cm), using the high-platform method to fix the drainage tube, with the drainage tube curved; and iv) the drainage tube between the two fixed points was inserted with a specific radian.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: that in the control group was fixed using the conventional lifting platform method
|
In terms of the control group, two lines of flexible cotton tape (3M 2733-25 Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) measuring 10 × 2.5 cm were used, and the drainage tube was fixed parallel to the long axis and glued to the middle-position 360° winding tube once the drainage tube was 0.5 cm higher than the surrounding skin.
Next, the drainage tube was fixed at both ends to the patient's skin using adhesive tape.
Then, the tube and the adhesive plaster were overlapped vertically and horizontally, the tube was inserted, the adhesive plaster was added, and then the chest tube was fixed on the adhesive plaster by knotting the interspersed cotton rope, which was equal to indirectly fixing the tube on the patient's skin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The extubation standard
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
The extubation standard is patients with good lung re-expansion after clamping for 24 h and no obvious air leakage after reopening the chest tube, and a drainage volume of <250 mL within 24 h, which can be removed.
|
2 hours
|
|
the pain numerical rating scale
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
no pain: 0 points, mild pain: 1-3 points, moderate pain: 4-7 points and severe pain: 8-10 points
|
2 hours
|
|
the Kolcaba comfort scalea(four-point scale)
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: agree, 4: strongly agree
|
2 hours
|
|
The adverse reactions
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
The chest skin was bulged, and the gas could be felt in the subcutaneous tissue through hand pressing, and there was a feeling of twisting or snow grip.
|
2 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Caifang Yang, Dr., Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Taizhouhospital002
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.