Pictograms to Facilitate Comprehension of Medical Indications (SIMAP)
Effects of an Automated System of Pictograms to Facilitate Comprehension of Medical Indications: A Randomised Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Rosa L Figueroa, ScD
- Phone Number: +56 9 924956932
- Email: rosa.figueroa@biomedica.udec.cl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: María A Rodriguez, PhD
- Phone Number: +56 41 2204302
- Email: secrevrid@udec.cl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Valparaíso, Chile
- Corporación Municipal de Valparaiso
-
-
Biobio
-
Hualpen, Biobio, Chile
- Dirección de Administración de Hualpen
-
Talcahuano, Biobio, Chile
- Dirección de Administración Salud de Talcahuano
-
-
Valparaiso
-
San Antonio, Valparaiso, Chile
- Ilustre Municipalidad de San Antonio
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years with a recent diagnosis of bronchial asthma (<=15 days) based on 2018 Global Initiative For Asthma (GINA) criteria.
- Diagnosis substantiated clinically and with consistent spirometry results as established by current GINA guidelines.
- Patients who are to initiate bronchodilator treatment, including at least one inhaled corticosteroid and one short-acting bronchodilator.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients presenting obstructive bronchial pathology other than bronchial asthma (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mixed states, etc.),
- Patients who have participated in the pictogram design phase (Stage 1 of the project),
- Patients with a diagnosis of dementia, diagnosis of harmful use of alcohol and other drugs according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10).
- Patients with significant ophthalmologic pathology that prevents the use of pictograms.
- Patients who do not wish to participate in the project.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pictogram Group
This intervention consists of using a pictogram system called SIMAP which was developed and validated in previous research. Participants allocated to this arm will received a pictographic depiction of their medical indications generated by an automated system. Information will include a description of inhaler functions, inhaler technique and correct aerochamber use. |
Pictographic depiction of medical indications alongside standard communication of these recommendations.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Usual Care Group
These patients will receive their medical indications in the usual way, as established by the health team of the participating clinics.
In addition, these patients will receive a bronchial asthma information leaflet as part of the usual education when explaining the disease.
No pictograms will be included in these leaflets.
|
Standard communication by medical staff of treatment indications for asthma.
An informative leaflet will be delivered as well.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Disease Control at 60 Days
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days after randomisation between groups using the Asthma Control Test (ACT).
Min Score: 5 (indicating poor asthma control), Max Score 25 (indicating complete control).
A score above 19 suggests well-controlled asthma.
|
60 days
|
|
Disease Control at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Asthma control achieved at 30 days after randomisation between groups using the Asthma Control Test (ACT).Min Score: 5 (indicating poor asthma control), Max Score 25 (indicating complete control).
A score above 19 suggests well-controlled asthma.
|
30 days
|
|
Disease Control at 7 Days
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Asthma control achieved at 7 days after randomisation between groups using the Asthma Control Test (ACT).
Min Score: 5 (indicating poor asthma control), Max Score 25 (indicating complete control).
A score above 19 suggests well-controlled asthma.
|
7 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Inhaler Technique
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Proper application of the inhaler technique.
|
60 days
|
|
Patient Adherence to Inhaler Technique Steps at 60 Days
Time Frame: 60 days
|
To assess patients' adherence to the correct inhaler technique, a five-step checklist was created, and a nurse evaluated each patient's inhalation technique.
Then, the number of participants who correctly completed each individual step was reported.
|
60 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Rosa L Figueroa, PhD, Universidad de Concepcion
- Study Director: Carla Taramasco, PhD, Universidad de Valparaiso
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Reddel HK, Bacharier LB, Bateman ED, Brightling CE, Brusselle GG, Buhl R, Cruz AA, Duijts L, Drazen JM, FitzGerald JM, Fleming LJ, Inoue H, Ko FW, Krishnan JA, Levy ML, Lin J, Mortimer K, Pitrez PM, Sheikh A, Yorgancioglu AA, Boulet LP. Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: Executive Summary and Rationale for Key Changes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;205(1):17-35. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2205PP.
- Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, Murray JJ, Pendergraft TB. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jan;113(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.008.
- Perez-Yarza EG, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Villa Asensi JR, Garde Garde J, Hidalgo Bermejo FJ; Grupo VESCASI. [Validation of a Spanish version of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (Sc-ACT) for use in Spain]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2015 Aug;83(2):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.10.031. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Spanish.
- Alvear G, Figueroa L, Hurtado G, Moyano L. Evaluación del grado de control del asma en un centro de atención primaria. Un estudio descriptivo. Rev. chil. enferm. respir. 2016; 32 (2): 68-76. Spanish.
- Barros IM, Alcantara TS, Mesquita AR, Bispo ML, Rocha CE, Moreira VP, Lyra Junior DP. Understanding of pictograms from the United States Pharmacopeia Dispensing Information (USP-DI) among elderly Brazilians. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Oct 29;8:1493-501. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S65301. eCollection 2014.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FONDEFID19I10120
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.