Confirmation of Diet as a Treatment for Gulf War Illness

July 5, 2024 updated by: Kathleen Holton, American University
This clinical trial aims to confirm previous findings from a smaller study which demonstrated significant improvements in all symptoms among veterans with Gulf War Illness after one month on the dietary intervention. The main objectives of this study are: 1) to confirm previous findings of treatment response to the diet in a larger and more diverse group; 2) to examine how changes in the nervous system may be the reason for improvement; and 3) to identify markers which change in the blood after one month on the diet. Participants will have baseline measures collected and then will be randomized into the intervention or wait-listed control group, which they will follow for one month before being reassessed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The rationale for the proposed research comes from observations from a smaller study which demonstrated profound widespread symptom improvements in veterans with Gulf War Illness (GWI) after one month on the diet. Improvements were noted in every symptom domain and included significant reductions in overall symptom number (with an average of 9 symptoms going away), reduced pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); and concurrent significant improvements in cognitive function and quality of life. Results also demonstrated that those who improved on the diet had a significant reduction in peripheral inflammation, as compared to those who did not improve on the diet. These benefits have been observed without any negative side effects and the majority of participants continued to follow the diet three months after study completion, suggesting continued improvement and good feasibility. The objectives of this study are: 1) to evaluate whether or not the substantial benefits observed in the recently completed clinical trial hold in a larger group of more diverse veterans with GWI, and 2) to identify blood and/or brain measures which predict improvement on the diet. By recruiting a large group of veterans which are representative of those with GWI, the findings of this research should be applicable to the larger GWI community. The impact of this research could be quite profound, with the diet being a no-risk, low-cost treatment option with no side effects, which allows each individual veteran to take back control of his/her health. There are no direct risks to following the diet since it is a healthy whole-food dietary approach which provides all necessary nutrients. The potential benefits of the diet include improvement in GWI symptoms; improvement in quality of life, potential for improvement in other health markers related to diet (such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure) and the possibility of benefit to the larger community. If positive results are confirmed in the proposed study, then the next step would be to teach all Veterans Administration (VA) dietitians how to administer the low glutamate diet so that all veterans have access to it, which should be possible within 1-2 years of the completion of this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20016
        • Recruiting
        • American University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kathleen F Holton, PhD, MPH
    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33314
        • Recruiting
        • Nova Southeastern University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Amanpreet Cheema, PhD
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Recruiting
        • Boston University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kimberly Sullivan, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Dylan Keating
          • Phone Number: 617-358-2230
          • Email: dmk13@bu.edu
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and Females of all races and ethnicities who are ≤75 yrs of age
  • Served in the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War
  • Fulfill both Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Kansas definitions of Gulf War Illness
  • Stable medication regimen for ≥1 month and willing to keep medications and supplements stable throughout study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent substance use disorder (past year)
  • Unwilling to stop using alcohol, tobacco (including vaping) and/or marijuana; or unwilling to change diet
  • Diagnosed seizure disorder or severe asthma requiring past hospitalization
  • Currently taking medication which affects glutamatergic or GABAergic neurotransmission (but can work with their physician to wean off of these medications prior to participating)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Dietary Intervention Group
Subjects will undergo a 2-hour in-depth training via Zoom on how to follow the diet and will receive a binder with helpful information. They will be give the weekend to prepare and then will start the diet the following Monday, and will continue following it for 4 weeks before being reassessed in the lab.
Behavioral: Dietary Intervention
This is a whole food, nutrient-dense diet that aims to remove exposure to specific food additives thought to have negative neurological effects, while also optimizing micronutrient intake.
No Intervention: Waitlisted Control Group
The waitlisted control group will follow their usual diet for one month and then will be reassessed (as a comparator group) before being trained on the dietary intervention which they will then follow for the next month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Symptom Score
Time Frame: 1-month
This measure computes the number of symptoms being experienced in this widespread chronic pain condition, and also computes a score based on severity of each symptom. The raw symptom score ranges from 0-32, and the symptom severity score ranges from 0-96, with higher scores indicative of worse outcomes.
1-month
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC)
Time Frame: 1-month
The PGIC is a self-report measure of the amount of change experienced from the treatment using a 7-point scale with the following options: very much worse, much worse, a little worse, no change, a little better, much better, very much better.
1-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1-month
This pain measure inquires about types of pain sensation ranked on a scale of 0 to 3, with a total score from 0-45. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
1-month
Chalder Fatigue Score
Time Frame: 1-month
The Chalder Fatigue Scale measures the extent and severity of fatigue. It is a scale with answers to each question based on both bimodal and likert scores, resulting in a total score of 0-11 and 0-33, with higher scores indicating more fatigue.
1-month
Veterans RAND 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36)
Time Frame: 1-month
This is a 36-item survey used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific impact on general and selected populations. The items on the questionnaire correspond to eight principal health domains including general health perceptions, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. This results in physical and mental health component quality of life scores, each scored from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
1-month
Brief Irritability Questionnaire (BITe)
Time Frame: 1-month
This short questionnaire assesses anger and irritability with 5 questions ranked on a 6-point scale. Higher scores indicate more irritability.
1-month
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 1-month
This is a 20-item measure that asks individuals to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression, such as restless sleep, poor appetite, and feeling lonely. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = Rarely or None of the Time, 1 = Some or Little of the Time, 2 = Moderately or Much of the time, 3 = Most or Almost All the Time). Scores range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
1-month
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 1-month
A brief questionnaire with 7 questions which measure generalized anxiety disorder. The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions. Total scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating more anxiety.
1-month
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: 1-month
The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. The self-report rating scale is 0-4 for each symptom, reflecting a change from 1-5 in the DSM-IV version. Rating scale descriptors are the same: "Not at all," "A little bit," Moderately," "Quite a bit," and "Extremely." A total symptom severity score (range - 0-80) can be obtained by summing the scores for each of the 20 items, with higher total scores indicating a higher probability of having PTSD.
1-month
Cognitive Testing
Time Frame: 1-month
Cognitive function will be measured using computerized cognitive testing software and one administered exam in-person. An overall score, called a neurocognitive index, is computed as the average of 5 domain scores, with higher scores equating to better cognitive function.
1-month
Dolorimetry
Time Frame: 1-month
Pain threshold will be measured using a dolorimeter, where pressure is applied to 18 points on the body that are typically tender in widespread chronic pain conditions. The participant will report when pain starts and the kilograms of pressure will be recorded. These will be averaged over the 18 sites, with higher scores indicative of having a higher (better) pain threshold.
1-month
Biophotonic scanner
Time Frame: 1-month
A biophotonic scanner will be used to assess long-term carotenoid intake from the diet. This is a painless test where an infared light is shone through the index finger. This results in a numeric score from 0-800, with a higher score indicative of higher dietary carotenoid intake.
1-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
American University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Boston University
Massachusetts General Hospital
Georgetown University
Nova Southeastern University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen F Holton, PhD, MPH, American University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2023-46
  • CDMRP-GW210080 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings