Individualized Functional Connectivity Targeting in aiTBS for Depression (AINT)

August 4, 2026 updated by: Joseph J. Taylor, MD, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

The Role of Individualized Functional Connectivity Targeting in Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (AINT) for Depression

The goal of this clinical trial is to estimate the importance of neuroimaging in accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) for depression. Participants will receive aiTBS treatment, but they will not know if their treatment spot was found with neuroimaging or head measurements.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Techniques for modulating human brain networks are rapidly evolving. One of the most exciting new developments is accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol that involves multiple daily treatments rather than gold standard once daily treatment. A specific accelerated iTBS protocol called Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) was cleared by the FDA in September 2022 based on two pilot studies in which patients with treatment-resistant depression rapidly and robustly improved with SAINT. Many of these patients had been depressed for decades and had not improved with conventional TMS or electroconvulsive therapy. Despite these promising results, two issues may limit SAINT scalability: 1) SAINT has only been tested at a single site in a small number of patients, 2) SAINT has never been tested without individualized resting state functional connectivity (rsfc) targeting, which is not widely available or covered by insurance. In this pilot trial, patients with treatment-resistant depression (n=40) will be randomized to one of two active treatment arms: 1) Real aiTBS with real individualized rsfc targeting, or 2) Real aiTBS with sham individualized rsfc targeting (i.e. conventional TMS targeting based on scalp landmarks). All patients will receive active stimulation, which will facilitate enrollment and reduce ethical concerns about placebo treatment in a vulnerable population when there is existing evidence of treatment efficacy. Patients and clinicians will be blind to group assignment, and blind integrity will be assessed. All patients will undergo MRI scans immediately before treatment and at one month follow up, which aligns with our clinical outcome measures.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English proficiency sufficient for informed consent, questionnaires/tasks, and treatment
  • Primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-V criteria (MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview)
  • >20 on BDI
  • >20 on the MADRS 10, 11
  • Moderate to severe level of treatment resistance (Maudsley Staging Method)
  • Stable antidepressant medication regimen, or remain medication free, for 4 weeks prior to treatment and to remain on this regimen throughout the study (including all follow-up assessments after the 5-day treatment protocol).
  • Primary clinician responsible for psychiatric care before, during, and after the trial
  • Agreement to lifestyle considerations
  • Abstain from becoming pregnant from screening through end of treatment
  • Continue usual intake patterns of caffeine- or xanthine-containing products (e.g., coffee, tea, soft drinks, chocolate) throughout treatment
  • Abstain from alcohol for at least 24 hours before the start of each MRI and TMS session
  • Abstain from tobacco products during treatment day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active pregnancy as determined by a urine pregnancy test
  • Primary psychiatric diagnosis other than major depressive disorder requiring treatment other than comorbid anxiety disorder
  • Those who did not respond to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) after 8 sessions
  • Recent (within 4 weeks) or concurrent use of rapid acting antidepressant agent (ketamine/esketamine/ECT)
  • History of:
  • Prior exposure to TMS
  • Neurosurgical intervention for depression
  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Intellectual disability
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Significant neurological illness (e.g., dementia, Parkinson's, Huntington's, brain tumor, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, brain lesion)
  • Untreated or insufficiently treated endocrine disorder
  • Treatment with investigational drug or intervention during the study period
  • Depth-adjusted TMS treatment dose > 65% maximum stimulator output
  • ≥ 30% change in MADRS score between screening and baseline
  • Anyone presenting with:
  • Mania or hypomania
  • Psychosis
  • Active suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt (defined by C-SSRS) within the past year
  • Neurological lesion
  • Contraindications to either TMS or MRI (e.g., metallic implants, severe insomnia > 4 hours per night with hypnotic, etc.).
  • Current moderate or severe substance use disorder or demonstrating signs of acute substance withdrawal
  • Positive urine drug screen for illicit substances
  • Severe borderline personality disorder
  • Any other condition deemed by the PI to interfere with the study or increase risk to the participant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: real individualized resting state functional connectivity targeting
Participants in this group will receive aiTBS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with individualized resting state functional connectivity.
Procedure: transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a focal, non-invasive form of brain stimulation that has FDA clearance for depression. In this study, a form of TMS called accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation will be administered under the supervision of a physician with TMS expertise. This protocol will be modeled after the FDA cleared Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) protocol, but the patented SAINT rsfc targeting algorithm will not be used for either arm.
Other Names:
  • TMS
  • theta burst stimulation
  • accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation
  • aiTBS
Other: sham individualized resting state functional connectivity targeting
Participants in this group will receive aiTBS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with head measurements (i.e., Beam F3)
Procedure: transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a focal, non-invasive form of brain stimulation that has FDA clearance for depression. In this study, a form of TMS called accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation will be administered under the supervision of a physician with TMS expertise. This protocol will be modeled after the FDA cleared Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) protocol, but the patented SAINT rsfc targeting algorithm will not be used for either arm.
Other Names:
  • TMS
  • theta burst stimulation
  • accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation
  • aiTBS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, one month after treatment
Depression severity rating scale (0-60, higher numbers indicate higher severity). The primary outcome measure was the baseline-adjusted MADRS score one month after treatment. The primary analysis of this primary outcome measure was the effect size of connectivity-based targeting.
Baseline, one month after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment
Depression severity rating scales (0-63, higher numbers indicate higher severity)
Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment
Anxiety severity rating scale (0-63, higher numbers indicate higher severity)
Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Baseline & 1 Month Post Treatment
Depression severity rating scale (0-60, higher numbers indicate higher severity). The primary analysis of the primary outcome will be the effect size of imaging-guided accelerated TMS relative to scalp-targeted TMS. In other words, the "number needed to scan." This outcome has not changed since the original grant application for this study and the data remain blinded at the time of this clarification. Actual group differences will be explored in a secondary analysis of this primary outcome measure.
Baseline & 1 Month Post Treatment
Change in Resting State Functional Connectivity in the Depression Network
Time Frame: Baseline, one month after treatment
Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal.
Baseline, one month after treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temperament and Character Inventory, Revised 140-item
Time Frame: Baseline, one month after treatment
Psychobiologically-based personality inventory which measures seven personality dimensions (harm avoidance, novelty seeking, reward dependence, persistence, self-directedness, cooperativeness, and persistence). For each dimension, this yields a scaled T-score (mean score of 50 with standard deviation of 10). This is an overall estimate of personality traits, and there are no "better" or "worse" traits.
Baseline, one month after treatment
Emotional Conflict Resolution Task
Time Frame: Baseline, one month after treatment
Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time
Baseline, one month after treatment
Learning, Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT)
Time Frame: Baseline, one month after treatment
Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time
Baseline, one month after treatment
Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40)
Time Frame: Baseline, one month after treatment
Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time
Baseline, one month after treatment
Death Suicide IAT (DSIAT)
Time Frame: Baseline, one month after treatment
Computer task measuring reaction time
Baseline, one month after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph J Taylor, MD, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 17, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 17, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2022p001650

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

De-identified survey response data and/or neuroimaging data may be shared with collaborators for further analysis.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings