Efficacy and Safety Analysis of ICIs Plus Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Treatment of Advanced NSCLC in Elderly Patients (IMAGINE)

January 17, 2023 updated by: jing xue, Suzhou Municipal Hospital

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Treatment of Advanced Driver-negative NSCLC in Elderly Patients：A Retrospective Study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors may is synergistic in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), however its true efficacy is still unclear. The investigators retrospectively compared clinical efficacy and safety of driver-negative elderly patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs with(or without)angiogenesis inhibitors in the Cancer Center of the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators reviewed the medical records of all lung cancer patients in the Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021, and a total of 79 patients were enrolled. The subjects were divided into two groups: the group treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus antiangiogenic drugs(IA group) and the group treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors without antiangiogenic drugs(NIA group). The data of PFS, OS, ORR, covariates, and Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were collected through electronic medical records and follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were OS, ORR and irAEs.All enrolled patients were followed up until August 1, 2022.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
79

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215001
        • The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The investigators retrospectively compared clinical efficacy and safety of driver-negative elderly patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs with(or without)angiogenesis inhibitors in the Cancer Center of the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.A total of 43 patients in the NIA group and 36 patients in the IA group were included in the study between January 1,2019 and December 31,2021.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥65 years old.
  2. Stage IV according to the AJCC Cancer grading manual (8th edition).
  3. Histologically confirmed NSCLC.
  4. No driver mutations.
  5. Received at least 2 courses of immunotherapy.
  6. Expected survival time > 3 months.
  7. No concurrent malignancy.
  8. Not participating in a clinical trial.
  9. The functions of important organs were basically normal.
  10. Sign informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
IA group
Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus angiogenesis inhibitors group
Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus angiogenesis inhibitors
PD-(L)1-based therapy plus Bevacizumab or Anlotinib
NIA group
Immune checkpoint inhibitors without angiogenesis inhibitors group
Drug: Immune checkpoint inhibitors without angiogenesis inhibitors
PD-(L)1-based therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFS
Time Frame: Up to August 1, 2022
PFS was defined as the time from the start of the first immunotherapy until disease progression or death
Up to August 1, 2022

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OS
Time Frame: Up to August 1, 2022
OS was defined as the time from the start of the first immunotherapy to death from any cause
Up to August 1, 2022
ORR
Time Frame: Up to August 1, 2022
ORR refers to the sum of complete response and partial response to treatment
Up to August 1, 2022
irAEs
Time Frame: Up to August 1, 2022
Immune-related adverse events were evaluated according to the CTCAE5.0 criteria
Up to August 1, 2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Suzhou Municipal Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: jing xue, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 17, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IMAGINE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings