Effect of Intravesical B.C.G and Gemcitabine on Semen Quality and Testicular Volume
Effect of Intravesical B.C.G and Gemcitabine on Semen Quality and Testicular Volume in Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ahmed A Elsayed, resident
- Phone Number: +2 01065973921
- Email: ahmed.14223921@med.aun.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male patients from 20 to 60's year old (the years of reproductive active men)
- Non muscle invasive bladder (T1 or less) urothelial carcinoma who are elected to intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy after TURT
Exclusion Criteria:
i. T1 carcinomas of bladder in which intravesical immunotherapy and chemotherapy is contraindicated ii. Patients under conditions that may affect sperm number, e.g. Systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy and previous history of genitourinary tuberculosis, Prostatic carcinoma,…etc iii. Abnormal semen parameters or abnormal hormonal profile (hypogonadism) that interfere with the study, especially azoospermia and aspermia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: BCG
6 doses of intravesical BCG
|
effect of local B.C.G and Gemcitabine on semen parametes and testicular volume
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
decrease of one or more semen parameters
Time Frame: after 3 month of the 1st semen analysis
|
According the 6th edition of WHO criteria of semen analysis, The main outcome is any decrease of one or more semen parameters like number of sperms less than 39 million totally, decrease in normal forms less than 4%, decrease in total motility less than 40% or progressive motility less than 30%, decrease in viability less than 54%, decrease in semen volume less than 1.5 ml.
|
after 3 month of the 1st semen analysis
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
testicular volume
Time Frame: after 3 month of the 1st scrotal Ultrasound
|
change in testicular volume less than 2 SD
|
after 3 month of the 1st scrotal Ultrasound
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Ahmed M Eltaher, professor, Professor . Dr
- Study Director: Hosny A Behnsawy, associate professor, Professor . Dr
- Study Director: Mohammed H Zarzour, lecturer, Dr
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Garg M, Sankhwar SN, Goel A, Kumar M, Singh BP, Singh V, Dalela D, Kumar A, Paul S. Effect of intravesical immunotherapy on sperm parameters in young patients with non--muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: prospective analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Jun;12(3):e83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
- 1. Humaid O. Al-Shamsi, Ibrahim H. Abu-Gheida, Faryal Iqbal, Aydah Al-Awadhi. Cancer in the Arab World.2022.SpringerNature. ISBN : 978-981-16-7944-5
- Raviv G, Pinthus JH, Shefi S, Mor Y, Kaufman-Francis K, Levron J, Weissenberg R, Ramon J, Madgar I. Effects of intravesical chemotherapy and immunotherapy on semen analysis. Urology. 2005 Apr;65(4):765-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.049.
- Avellino G, Theva D, Oates RD. Common urologic diseases in older men and their treatment: how they impact fertility. Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):305-311. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
- Flaig TW, Spiess PE, Agarwal N, Bangs R, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, Chang S, Downs TM, Efstathiou JA, Friedlander T, Greenberg RE, Guru KA, Guzzo T, Herr HW, Hoffman-Censits J, Hoimes C, Inman BA, Jimbo M, Kader AK, Lele SM, Michalski J, Montgomery JS, Nandagopal L, Pagliaro LC, Pal SK, Patterson A, Plimack ER, Pohar KS, Preston MA, Sexton WJ, Siefker-Radtke AO, Tward J, Wright JL, Gurski LA, Johnson-Chilla A. Bladder Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Mar;18(3):329-354. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0011.
- Han MA, Maisch P, Jung JH, Hwang JE, Narayan V, Cleves A, Hwang EC, Dahm P. Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 14;6(6):CD009294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009294.pub3.
- Griswold MD. Spermatogenesis: The Commitment to Meiosis. Physiol Rev. 2016 Jan;96(1):1-17. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2015.
- Amann RP. The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in humans: a need to revisit? J Androl. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):469-87. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.107.004655. Epub 2008 May 22.
- Frick J, Kunit G, Joos H, Rovan E, Talwar GP. Effect of intratesticular administration of BCG on testicular function (preliminary report). Int Urol Nephrol. 1983;15(1):71-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02082110.
- Polland A, Berookhim BM. Fertility concerns in men with genitourinary malignancies: Treatment dilemmas, fertility options, and medicolegal considerations. Urol Oncol. 2016 Sep;34(9):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
- Mulhall JP, Applegarth LD, Oates RD, Schlegel PN. Fertility Preservation in Male Cancer Patients: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
- Boitrelle F, Shah R, Saleh R, Henkel R, Kandil H, Chung E, Vogiatzi P, Zini A, Arafa M, Agarwal A. The Sixth Edition of the WHO Manual for Human Semen Analysis: A Critical Review and SWOT Analysis. Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 9;11(12):1368. doi: 10.3390/life11121368.
- Talarczyk-Desole J, Berger A, Taszarek-Hauke G, Hauke J, Pawelczyk L, Jedrzejczak P. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice? Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(2):56-60. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0012.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms
- Urologic Neoplasms
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Urologic Diseases
- Urinary Bladder Diseases
- Infertility, Male
- Infertility
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
- Oligospermia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Antiviral Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
- Gemcitabine
- BCG Vaccine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- local drugs on semen
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.