Effects of Developing a Mobile-based Interactive Simulation Scheme for Assisting the Personalized Hands-on Learning of Nasogastric Tube Insertion
Effects of Developing a Mobile-based Interactive Simulation Scheme for Assisting the Personalized Hands-on Learning of Nasogastric Tube Insertion: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tainan, Taiwan, 704
- National Cheng Kung University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- fifth-year undergraduate medical students
- at least 20 years old
- without any practical clinical experience
Exclusion Criteria:
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: experimental group
|
A mobile-based interactive simulation scheme (MISS) was proposed and developed to investigate its effects on facilitating hands-on learning of NG insertion in undergraduate medical students.
|
|
No Intervention: control group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The 10-item evaluation questionnaire on Nasogastric tube insertion knowledge
Time Frame: one week
|
0-100.
Zero is the worst, and 100 is the best.
|
one week
|
|
The self-confidence scale (C-scale)
Time Frame: one week
|
1-5.
One is high uncertainty, and five is complete certainty.
|
one week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: one week
|
1-5.
One is strongly disagree, and five is strongly agree.
|
one week
|
|
The NASA-TLX (Task load index)
Time Frame: one week
|
1-5.
One is strongly disagree, and five is strongly agree.
|
one week
|
|
The overall learning satisfaction
Time Frame: one week
|
1-5 each.
One is strongly disagree, and five is strongly agree.
The questionnaire included 20 questions, divided into 11 categories: perceived enjoyment, comparison, diagnosis report, satisfaction, intension to use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, image, output quality, result demonstrability, and cognitive load.
|
one week
|
|
The OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) test
Time Frame: one week
|
0-100.
Zero is the worst, and 100 is the best.
|
one week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NCKUH-B-ER-109-194
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.