QST for Corneal Nerve Function

January 6, 2026 updated by: Tufts Medical Center

The Efficacy of Quantitative Sensory Test (QST) in Assessing Corneal Nerve Functions in Patients With Ocular Surface Diseases

This study is designed to learn more about the impact different types of stimuli, such as heat, cold and vibration, can have on ocular pain response. This is called quantitative sensory testing (QST). Most procedures being performed in this study, except the QST, are standard of care which means they are performed during the participant's routine eye examination.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Quantitative Sensory Test (QST) is a non-invasive neurophysiological method that refers to a group of procedures that assess the perceptual responses to systematically applied and quantifiable sensory stimuli for the purpose of characterizing somatosensory function or dysfunction.

In this study, we propose to evaluate corneal nerve functions in patients with corneal nerve abnormalities by QST and correlate the nerve functions with symptoms, clinical signs and nerve morphology detected by In-Vivo Confocal Microscopy (IVCM). Identification of corneal nerve functions and correlations with other findings may help us to understand underlying pathological mechanisms of the disease and may guide us toward new treatment targets.

We hypothesize that, QST may provide us detailed information about corneal nerve function alterations and may correlate with morphological nerve changes detected by IVCM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
108

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Group 1: Stage I Neurotrophic Keratopathy (NK)

  1. Clinical findings of Stage I NK
  2. Decreased nerve density by IVCM
  3. Decreased corneal sensation

Group 2: Stage II NK

  1. Clinical findings of Stage II NK
  2. Decreased nerve density by IVCM
  3. Decreased corneal sensation

Group 3: Dry Eye Disease (DED)

  1. Symptoms of DED at least 3 months
  2. Presence of at least one of the following DED signs; tear film break-up time lower than 7, ocular surface staining more than +1 based on NIH scale
  3. Normal or mildly effected corneal sensation

Group 4: Healthy Individuals

  1. Absence of any ocular surface symptoms
  2. Absence of ocular surface findings
  3. Transparent and clear cornea
  4. Normal corneal sensation

Group 5: NCP

  1. Presence of neuropathic symptoms AND
  2. Symptoms out of proportion to clinical findings AND
  3. Nerve abnormalities detected by in vivo confocal microscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of diabetes
  2. History of ocular surgery, corneal infection, or corneal injury within the last 3 months
  3. Systemic regular anti-inflammatory and/or steroid and/or immune-modulatory therapy in the last 3 months
  4. Active ocular allergies
  5. Any major psychiatric illness including bipolar, psychosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depression
  6. Pregnancy
  7. History of surgery within the last 3 months
  8. History of , sarcoidosis, GVHD or collagen vascular disease
  9. Allergic to benzalkonium chloride "BAK" (an eye-drop preservative)
  10. Concurrent enrollment in other studies that in the opinion of the investigator will interfere with the results of this study
  11. Non-English speakers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Stage I Neurotrophic Keratopathy
Clinical findings of corneal hyperplasia and irregularity, scattered small facets of dried epithelium, decreased nerve density as assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and decreased corneal sensation.
Device: Quantitative Sensory Test
Quantitative Sensory Test (Medoc Ltd, Israel), QST is a non-invasive neurophysiological method that refers to a group of procedures that assess the perceptual responses to systematically applied and quantifiable sensory stimuli (modalities including heat, cold and vibration) for the purpose of characterizing somatosensory function or dysfunction. For this test, subjects will be seated comfortably on a chair in a quiet room, or laying supine in a horizontal examination chair, with ambient temperature of 24-25◦ C. Medial upper eyelid; just below the supraorbital notch, nasolacrimal sac area; 4-5 mm medial to nasal cantus, and non-dominant forearm will be used as test sites. Patients will be instructed in detail of the nature of the test and the need to react attentively and promptly to change in temperatures.
Experimental: Stage II Neurotrophic Keratopathy
Clinical findings of corneal epithelial defect with smooth and rolled edges, decreased nerve density as assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and decreased corneal sensation.
Device: Quantitative Sensory Test
Quantitative Sensory Test (Medoc Ltd, Israel), QST is a non-invasive neurophysiological method that refers to a group of procedures that assess the perceptual responses to systematically applied and quantifiable sensory stimuli (modalities including heat, cold and vibration) for the purpose of characterizing somatosensory function or dysfunction. For this test, subjects will be seated comfortably on a chair in a quiet room, or laying supine in a horizontal examination chair, with ambient temperature of 24-25◦ C. Medial upper eyelid; just below the supraorbital notch, nasolacrimal sac area; 4-5 mm medial to nasal cantus, and non-dominant forearm will be used as test sites. Patients will be instructed in detail of the nature of the test and the need to react attentively and promptly to change in temperatures.
Experimental: Dry Eye Disease
Symptoms of dry eye disease for at least 3 months, supported by clinical finding of decreased tear film break-up time or ocular surface staining. Normal corneal sensation.
Device: Quantitative Sensory Test
Quantitative Sensory Test (Medoc Ltd, Israel), QST is a non-invasive neurophysiological method that refers to a group of procedures that assess the perceptual responses to systematically applied and quantifiable sensory stimuli (modalities including heat, cold and vibration) for the purpose of characterizing somatosensory function or dysfunction. For this test, subjects will be seated comfortably on a chair in a quiet room, or laying supine in a horizontal examination chair, with ambient temperature of 24-25◦ C. Medial upper eyelid; just below the supraorbital notch, nasolacrimal sac area; 4-5 mm medial to nasal cantus, and non-dominant forearm will be used as test sites. Patients will be instructed in detail of the nature of the test and the need to react attentively and promptly to change in temperatures.
Experimental: Healthy Individuals
Absence of any ocular symptoms, absence of surface findings (including corneal or conjunctival staining, corneal scar or surgical wound), and normal corneal sensation.
Device: Quantitative Sensory Test
Quantitative Sensory Test (Medoc Ltd, Israel), QST is a non-invasive neurophysiological method that refers to a group of procedures that assess the perceptual responses to systematically applied and quantifiable sensory stimuli (modalities including heat, cold and vibration) for the purpose of characterizing somatosensory function or dysfunction. For this test, subjects will be seated comfortably on a chair in a quiet room, or laying supine in a horizontal examination chair, with ambient temperature of 24-25◦ C. Medial upper eyelid; just below the supraorbital notch, nasolacrimal sac area; 4-5 mm medial to nasal cantus, and non-dominant forearm will be used as test sites. Patients will be instructed in detail of the nature of the test and the need to react attentively and promptly to change in temperatures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thermal stimulus response to QST on site of trigeminal nerve first branch, as assessed by cold detection threshold (CDT) and hot detection threshold (HDT)
Time Frame: From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Cold and heat sensation thresholds will be evaluated by placing a 16 mm x 16 mm probe over the skin on the site to be tested, and an average of 3 reading while be taken for each stimuli. Participants will receive successive ramps of gradually decreasing or increasing temperature, starting from a resting neutral temperature of 32°C. Participants will be instructed to press a response button when a thermal sensation (either cold or warm) is perceived.
From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Mechanical stimulus response to QST on site of trigeminal nerve first branch, as assessed by vibration detection threshold (VDT)
Time Frame: From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Vibration sensation threshold will be evaluated by placing a 16 mm x 16 mm probe over the skin on the site to be tested, and an average of 3 reading while be taken. Participants will receive successive ramps of gradually decreasing or increasing vibration, starting from. Participants will be instructed to press a response button when a mechanical sensation is perceived.
From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Differences in thermal stimulus pain threshold across the 4 study arms
Time Frame: From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Cold pain threshold (CPT) and heat pain threshold (HPT) will be measured by asking participants to press a response button when they first feel a pain or discomfort from probe on QST testing
From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Differences in mechanical stimulus pain threshold across the 4 study arms
Time Frame: From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Vibration pain threshold (VPT) will be measured by asking participants to press a response button when they first feel a pain or discomfort from vibration probe on QST testing
From visit 1 up to 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To correlate the QST responses with morphological changes of corneal nerves detected by IVCM
Time Frame: From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) imaging will be performed to observe for any morphological nerve changes; such as decreased nerve density, nerve tortuosity presence of microneuromas.
From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
To correlate symptom severity as assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), to stimulus response across the 4 interventional arms.
Time Frame: From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire A 12-item questionnaire designed to provide a rapid assessment of the symptoms of ocular irritation consistent with dry eye disease and their impact on vision-related functioning. The 12 items of the OSDI questionnaire are graded on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 indicates none of the time; 1, some of the time; 2, half of the time; 3, most of the time; and 4, all of the time. The total OSDI score is then calculated on the basis of the following formula: OSDI= [(sum of scores for all questions answered) x 100]/[(total number of questions answered) x 4]. Higher OSDI scores represent greater severity of symptoms.
From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
To compare QST response differences between trigeminal nerve first branch and forearm in patients.
Time Frame: From visit 1 up to 4 weeks
Measurement of stimuli detection thresholds, pain thresholds and pain ranges for different stimuli (cold, heat and vibration) type in study groups at 3 different periocular sites (just below supraorbital notch, lateral canthus, inferior orbital bone; 1 cm lateral of medial canthus) and non-dominant hand hypothenar eminence (as a reference site)
From visit 1 up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tufts Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pedram Hamrah, MD, Tufts Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00002510

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings