Optimizing In-hospital Use of Evidence-based Therapies for Patients With Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Disease (IMPLEMENT-CRM)

September 18, 2024 updated by: Duke University

Identifying Barriers to and optiMizing In-hosPitaL usE of Evidenced-based Medical thErapies for patieNTs With Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Disease

This study will be a prospective randomized implementation trial for patients hospitalized with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus within Duke University Medical Center. The primary hypothesis is that a virtual quality improvement-based consult intervention will improve the rate of in-hospital evidence-based cardio-renal-metabolic medication use, particularly SGLT2 inhibitor therapy. Approximately 200 patients meeting eligibility criteria will be included in the study. Patients will be assigned into study groups, as defined by randomization of their treating clinician team to receiving the virtual consult versus not.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
202

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27707
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Hospitalized adults age ≥ 18 years with ≥1 of the following diagnoses, as defined by the medical record:

  1. HF (any ejection fraction)
  2. CKD with estimated GFR ≥ 20 mL/min/1.73m2 *
  3. T2DM (by clinical history or hemoglobin A1c)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. End-stage stage renal disease on dialysis or eGFR <20 mL/kg/1.73m2.
  2. Pre-menopausal woman who are either breast-feeding or pregnant
  3. History of heart transplant or actively listed for heart transplant
  4. Implanted left ventricular assist device or implant anticipated within 3 months.
  5. Enrolled in or planning to enroll in hospice care.
  6. Active cancer (except localized prostate, breast, or non-melanoma skin cancers)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual care
Active Comparator: Virtual Consult Intervention
The intervention will consist of a quality improvement (QI)-based virtual consult designed by a multi-disciplinary team that will aim to address provider-level, patient-level, and system-level barriers to cardio-renal-metabolic disease medications.
Other: Virtual Consult Intervention
The intervention will consist of a quality improvement (QI)-based virtual consult designed by a multi-disciplinary team that will aim to address provider-level, patient-level, and system-level barriers to cardio-renal-metabolic disease medications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of patients prescribed SGLT2i (sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors)
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days)
Proportion of patients prescribed SGLT2i (sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors)
Time Frame: 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of participants with ACEI/ARB therapy among patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of participants with ARNI for heart failure
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of participants with Beta-blocker therapy for heart failure with ejection fraction <50%
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of participants with Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for heart failure
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of participants with GLP-1 receptor agonist for type 2 diabetes
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of participants with GLP-1 receptor agonist and/or SGLT2i for type 2 diabetes
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Composite medication score at discharge based on the use of ≥ 50% target dosing of ACEI/ARB/ARNI and beta-blocker, any MRA dose, and any SGLT2i dose (for patients with heart failure and ejection fraction </=40% only).
Time Frame: hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
hospital discharge (up to approximately 14 days), 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of participants with all-cause hospital readmission
Time Frame: 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
Number of participants with heart failure readmission
Time Frame: 30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)
30 days post-discharge (approximately 6 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen J Greene, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 18, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00112465

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings