Percutaneous Electrolysis, Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy and Eccentric Exercise in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy.
Percutaneous Electrolysis, Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy and Eccentric Exercise in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cádiz
-
Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain, 11007
- Policlínica Santa María
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with supraspinatus tendinopathies that do not improve with conventional physiotherapy or pharmacological therapy protocols.
- Subjects who are in an active state of pain, who present painful symptoms in a sensitive and painful area of the tendon of insertion of the supraspinatus muscle in the humerus.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who have received surgery intervention in the same shoulder, or have suffered fractures or dislocations in the same shoulder.
- Individuals have received the proposed treatment in one month´s period previously.
- Individuals who suffering from cervical radiculopathies, fibromialgia síndrome, cardiac patients with pacemakers, cancer, infectious processes, or generalized lymphedema.
- Pregnant women can not receive this treatment intervention.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Percutaneous Electrolysis and neuromodulation.
The intervention for this group consisted of Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis and neuromodulation.
Patient received once week for four weeks associated with eccentric exercises device at home.
|
Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis an neuromodulation associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
The multimodal physical therapy program includes 10 sessions of: Ultrasound pulsatil therapy (US) for 10 minutes , transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 minutes ans associated with eccentric exercises device at home. |
Ultrasound pulsatil therapy (US), transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 minutes and associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The intensity of shoulder pain
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area.
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The intensity of shoulder pain
Time Frame: Twelve weeks
|
A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area.
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).
|
Twelve weeks
|
|
The intensity of shoulder pain.
Time Frame: Four weeks
|
A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area.
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).
|
Four weeks
|
|
Questionnaire DASH.
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities.
This questionnaire is a self-re, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
Scale SPADI.
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities.
The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain.
Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use.
Both dimensions account for 50% of the overall score, and scores from 0 to 100.
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
Active shoulder range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
The range of motion will be evaluated in flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation and abduction with a goniometric
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
Pressure pain thresholds in supraspinatus trigger points
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be measured with a pressure algometer (Baseline, Pain TestTM, Wagner Instruments).
The clinimetric properties of this instrument have been evaluated previously.
The PPT will the point at which pressure elicited pain and will presented as kilograms per square centimeter.
All measurements will be conducted by the same well-trained physician.
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
Questionnaire SF 12
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
SF-12 questionnaire is a reliable measure of perceived health that describes the degree of general physical health status and mental health distress.
It consists of 12 items, derived from the physical and mental domains.
In our study SF-12 was considered altered if the score was <40, either from the physical or mental functioning point of view, because means of 50 and standard deviations of 10 are usually achieved in the general population.
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
GROCS scale
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
The multidimensional health related quality of life.
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
The jobe test
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
Jobe's test assesses for possible supraspinatus weakness and/or impingement.
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
The Neer test
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
The Neer test is performed to check for compression of the rotator cuff tendons at the coracoacromial arch.
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
|
Hawkins-Kennedy test
Time Frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
the Hawkins-Kennedy test is a test for impingement in the shoulder
|
Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: manuel rodriguez huguet, Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dejaco B, Habets B, van Loon C, van Grinsven S, van Cingel R. Eccentric versus conventional exercise therapy in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized, single blinded, clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2051-2059. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4223-x. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
- Valera-Garrido F, Minaya-Munoz F, Medina-Mirapeix F. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis in chronic lateral epicondylitis: short-term and long-term results. Acupunct Med. 2014 Dec;32(6):446-54. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2014-010619. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
- Arias-Buria JL, Truyols-Dominguez S, Valero-Alcaide R, Salom-Moreno J, Atin-Arratibel MA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrolysis and Eccentric Exercises for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:315219. doi: 10.1155/2015/315219. Epub 2015 Nov 15.
- Heron SR, Woby SR, Thompson DP. Comparison of three types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy/shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
- Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;43(6):409-16. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051193. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
- McCreesh K, Lewis J. Continuum model of tendon pathology - where are we now? Int J Exp Pathol. 2013 Aug;94(4):242-7. doi: 10.1111/iep.12029.
- Khan KM, Cook JL, Maffulli N, Kannus P. Where is the pain coming from in tendinopathy? It may be biochemical, not only structural, in origin. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Apr;34(2):81-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.2.81. No abstract available. Erratum In: Br J Sports Med 2000 Aug;34(4):318.
- Rodriguez-Huguet M, Gongora-Rodriguez J, Rodriguez-Huguet P, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Martin-Valero R, Diaz-Fernandez A, Lomas-Vega R. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):1837. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061837.
- Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;43(4):236-41. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052175. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
- Osborne JD, Gowda AL, Wiater B, Wiater JM. Rotator cuff rehabilitation: current theories and practice. Phys Sportsmed. 2016;44(1):85-92. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2016.1108883. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
- Garcia Bermejo P, De La Cruz Torres B, Naranjo Orellana J, Albornoz Cabello M. Autonomic Responses to Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis: Effect of Needle Puncture or Electrical Current? J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Jan;24(1):69-75. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0339. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
- Rodriguez-Huguet M, Gongora-Rodriguez J, Lomas-Vega R, Martin-Valero R, Diaz-Fernandez A, Obrero-Gaitan E, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Rodriguez-Almagro D. Percutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):2068. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072068.
- Littlewood C, Ashton J, Chance-Larsen K, May S, Sturrock B. Exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
- Kinsella R, Cowan SM, Watson L, Pizzari T. A comparison of isometric, isotonic concentric and isotonic eccentric exercises in the physiotherapy management of subacromial pain syndrome/rotator cuff tendinopathy: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Nov 14;3:45. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0190-3. eCollection 2017.
- Lin ML, Chiu HW, Shih ZM, Lee PY, Li PZ, Guo CH, Luo YJ, Lin SC, Lin KY, Hsu YM, Pang A, Pang W. Two Transcutaneous Stimulation Techniques in Shoulder Pain: Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (TPRF) versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): A Comparative Pilot Study. Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 4;2019:2823401. doi: 10.1155/2019/2823401. eCollection 2019.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Percutaneous Electrolysis
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.