Email Nudges to Improve GDMT (MRA) Adherence in Heart Failure (ENIGMA-HF)

April 29, 2024 updated by: Nicholas K. Brownell, MD, University of California, Los Angeles
The Email Nudges to Improve GDMT (MRA) Adherence in Heart Failure (ENIGMA-HF) study is a pragmatic parallel-arm randomized control trial of a quality improvement (QI) intervention involving email nudges to cardiology clinic managers to schedule appointments specific to guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) initiation, with the goal of optimizing mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist (MRA) use by patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) cared for by cardiologists within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Importance: Guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) is a specific set of 4 medications proven to improve morbidity and mortality for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet they are underutilized nationally and internationally. Various quality improvement (QI) interventions have had varying degrees of success at increasing GDMT prescription and titration.

Objective: The purpose of the study is to assess whether email nudges to UCLA Health cardiology clinic managers to schedule GDMT-specific appointments can lead to increased utilization of a specific medication within GDMT called a mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist (MRA). Pertinent secondary objectives will include evaluating whether email nudges specific to MRA would increase utilization of the other medications in GDMT and whether they would increase appointments specific to GDMT.

Design, Setting, and Participants: The basic design is a pragmatic parallel-arm randomized control trial of a QI intervention. The setting is cardiology outpatient clinics at a large university-based single integrated healthcare system (UCLA Health). Participants are outpatients with HFrEF under the care of a UCLA cardiologist, with an ejection fraction on file, and currently not prescribed an MRA.

Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will lead to an increased utilization of MRA, compared to the control arm.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Facility: UCLA Health System
  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Patient is under the care of a UCLA cardiologist
  • Patient has a primary diagnosis of HFrEF
  • Patient is not currently prescribed an MRA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hyperkalemia
  • Chronic kidney disease stage 4 or higher
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Heart transplant or ventricular-assist device patients
  • Hospice patients
  • Patients without an LVEF on file
  • Patients with an EF >35%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention - Email Nudge
The intervention will include contacting UCLA Health Cardiology clinic managers with a list of all HFrEF patients eligible for an MRA who are cared for by a provider randomized to the intervention arm. Clinic managers will be asked to make an appointment in the next 60 days for these patients with the specific indication: GDMT initiation - consider MRA. If an appointment is already present in the next 60 days, the indication will be changed to: GDMT initiation - consider MRA.
Other: Email Nudge
An email to UCLA Health Cardiology clinic managers with a list of MRA-eligible HFrEF patients and a request to schedule or change cardiology appointments.
No Intervention: No Intervention - Control Group
Providers randomized to the control arm will perform clinical duties as usual. Their patients will receive routine clinical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed MRA
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed ACE/ARB/ARNI, beta blocker, or SGLT2i
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta blocker, or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed ACE/ARB/ARNI
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed ARNI
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed beta blocker
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for beta-blocker compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed SGLT2i
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible patients who have an appointment scheduled or indication changed in 60 days
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that have an appointment actively scheduled or an appointment indication actively changed within 60 days of study initiation.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients who have an appointment scheduled in 60 days
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that have an appointment actively scheduled within 60 days of study initiation.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients who have an appointment indication changed in 60 days
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that have an appointment already scheduled within 60 days of study initiation, but have the indication changed to "GDMT initiation - consider MRA."
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients who have a BMP ordered after MRA initiation
Time Frame: 60 days
Safety endpoint: Proportion of patients that receive an active order for a basic metabolic panel (BMP) after being prescribed a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Los Angeles

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nicholas K Brownell, MD, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Principal Investigator: David J Cho, MD MBA, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Principal Investigator: Pooya I Bokhoor, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 29, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UCLA IRB#23-000305

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings