Email Nudges to Improve GDMT (MRA) Adherence in Heart Failure (ENIGMA-HF)

April 7, 2023 updated by: Nicholas K. Brownell, MD, University of California, Los Angeles
The Email Nudges to Improve GDMT (MRA) Adherence in Heart Failure (ENIGMA-HF) study is a pragmatic parallel-arm randomized control trial of a quality improvement (QI) intervention involving email nudges to cardiology clinic managers to schedule appointments specific to guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) initiation, with the goal of optimizing mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist (MRA) use by patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) cared for by cardiologists within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Importance: Guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) is a specific set of 4 medications proven to improve morbidity and mortality for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet they are underutilized nationally and internationally. Various quality improvement (QI) interventions have had varying degrees of success at increasing GDMT prescription and titration.

Objective: The purpose of the study is to assess whether email nudges to UCLA Health cardiology clinic managers to schedule GDMT-specific appointments can lead to increased utilization of a specific medication within GDMT called a mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist (MRA). Pertinent secondary objectives will include evaluating whether email nudges specific to MRA would increase utilization of the other medications in GDMT and whether they would increase appointments specific to GDMT.

Design, Setting, and Participants: The basic design is a pragmatic parallel-arm randomized control trial of a QI intervention. The setting is cardiology outpatient clinics at a large university-based single integrated healthcare system (UCLA Health). Participants are outpatients with HFrEF under the care of a UCLA cardiologist, with an ejection fraction on file, and currently not prescribed an MRA.

Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will lead to an increased utilization of MRA, compared to the control arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Facility: UCLA Health System
  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Patient is under the care of a UCLA cardiologist
  • Patient has a primary diagnosis of HFrEF
  • Patient is not currently prescribed an MRA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hyperkalemia
  • Chronic kidney disease stage 4 or higher
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Heart transplant or ventricular-assist device patients
  • Hospice patients
  • Patients without an LVEF on file
  • Patients with an EF >35%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention - Email Nudge
The intervention will include contacting UCLA Health Cardiology clinic managers with a list of all HFrEF patients eligible for an MRA who are cared for by a provider randomized to the intervention arm. Clinic managers will be asked to make an appointment in the next 60 days for these patients with the specific indication: GDMT initiation - consider MRA. If an appointment is already present in the next 60 days, the indication will be changed to: GDMT initiation - consider MRA.
An email to UCLA Health Cardiology clinic managers with a list of MRA-eligible HFrEF patients and a request to schedule or change cardiology appointments.
No Intervention: No Intervention - Control Group
Providers randomized to the control arm will perform clinical duties as usual. Their patients will receive routine clinical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed MRA
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed ACE/ARB/ARNI, beta blocker, or SGLT2i
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta blocker, or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed ACE/ARB/ARNI
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed ARNI
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed beta blocker
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for beta-blocker compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients prescribed SGLT2i
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that receive an active prescription for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) compared between arms at the end of the study.
60 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible patients who have an appointment scheduled or indication changed in 60 days
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that have an appointment actively scheduled or an appointment indication actively changed within 60 days of study initiation.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients who have an appointment scheduled in 60 days
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that have an appointment actively scheduled within 60 days of study initiation.
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients who have an appointment indication changed in 60 days
Time Frame: 60 days
Proportion of patients that have an appointment already scheduled within 60 days of study initiation, but have the indication changed to "GDMT initiation - consider MRA."
60 days
Percentage of eligible patients who have a BMP ordered after MRA initiation
Time Frame: 60 days
Safety endpoint: Proportion of patients that receive an active order for a basic metabolic panel (BMP) after being prescribed a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicholas K Brownell, MD, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Principal Investigator: David J Cho, MD MBA, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Principal Investigator: Pooya I Bokhoor, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Clinical Trials on Email Nudge

3
Subscribe