Re-irradiation for Pelvic Recurrences in Rectal Cancer Patients (Re-RAD-I)
External Beam Radiotherapy for Pelvic Recurrences in Rectal Cancer Patients Previously Treated With Radiotherapy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Locally recurrent rectal cancer
- Previous pelvic RT for rectal cancer and surgery
- Potentially resectable by MRI and palpation by MDT evaluation
- Absence of non-resectable distant metastases by PET-CT
- Age ≥ 18
- Adequate organ function
- Acceptable bowel and bladder function
- Acceptance for TR sampling
Exclusion Criteria:
- Central small recurrences deemed immediate resectable
- Previous radiotherapy <12 month prior to recurrence
- Non-resectable systemic or regional disease
- Unable to undergo MRI or PET-CT
- Medical comorbidities precluding radical surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Single
Re-irradiation consisting of hyperfractionated IMRT, 40.8 Gy in 1.2 fractions twice daily 5/7 days weekly, with oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 BID on radiotherapy treatment days.
Re-staging performed 4-6 weeks after the last dose, followed by surgery, when feasible.
|
40.8Gy/34 fractions (1.2Gy BID 5/7 days with minimum 6 hours interval) Concurrent capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID 5/7 days)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Resection rate
Time Frame: At surgery
|
Rate of complete pathological resection R0
|
At surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physician reported Toxicity
Time Frame: Acute and late toxicity evaluations during and at 6,12 and 36 months post surgery
|
Clinical and laboratory AEs (Adverse Events) will be graded according to NCICTCAE (version 4.0).
|
Acute and late toxicity evaluations during and at 6,12 and 36 months post surgery
|
|
QoL assessment according to QLQ-CR29
Time Frame: Pre-treatment and 12 months post surgery
|
Assesment of QoL according to EORTC guidelines.
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a tumor-specific health related QoL questionnaire module for CRC patients.
Patients are asked to indicate their symptoms during the past week(s).
According to EORTC guidelines, scores can be reported as frequencies of raw scores or scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100.
Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms on the symptom scales.
|
Pre-treatment and 12 months post surgery
|
|
QoL assessment according to EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Pre-treatment and 12 months post surgery
|
Assesment of QoL according to EORTC guidelines.
The EORTC QLQ-CR30 is a general health related QoL questionnaire.
Patients are asked to indicate their symptoms during the past week(s).
According to EORTC guidelines, scores can be reported as frequencies of raw scores or scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100.
Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms on the symptom scales.
|
Pre-treatment and 12 months post surgery
|
|
Recurrence rate
Time Frame: Rate of re-recurrence at 6, 12 and 36 months post surgery.
|
Rate of re-recurrence
|
Rate of re-recurrence at 6, 12 and 36 months post surgery.
|
|
Comparative dose planning study
Time Frame: The VMAT plans generated before treatment start (baseline) is compared to IMPT plans.
|
Potential organ at risk sparing when comparing photons vs protons - comparative dose planning
|
The VMAT plans generated before treatment start (baseline) is compared to IMPT plans.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karen-Lise G Spindler, MD, Phd, Aarhus University Hospital, Depart. Oncology
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KFE-1506
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.