Pain Management in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies
Comparison of the Effects of Erector Spina Plan Block and Paravertebral Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies on Pain Management.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Merkez
-
Giresun, Merkez, Turkey, 28100
- Giresun University Medical School Hospital.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged >18 years
- patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II -who were planned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Did not provide informed consent,
- Had any psychiatric or mental problem that prevented understanding of the informed consent form
- They were planned to undergo emergency cholecystectomy,
- Had any allergy or hypersensitivity to local anaesthetic,
- Had an infection in the needle entry area
- History of coagulopathy or the use of anticoagulants
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)
The spinous processes of the vertebrae were marked up to T8 level.
After providing antisepsis of the skin with 10% povidone iodine, the ultrasound probe was placed at T8 level parallel to the vertebral spine at T8.
The transverse process (TP) and hyperechoic pleura were observed 2.5cm right lateral of the spinous process.
Using the in-plane approach, the needle was placed in the caudal direction.
After confirming displacement of the pleura with 0.5-1ml local anaesthetic (LA), 20ml 0.25% bupivacaine was administered for the block .
|
Erector spinae plane block
|
|
Active Comparator: Paravertebral Block (PVB)
After sterilisation of the skin with povidone iodine, the probe covered with a sterile sheath was placed 3cm lateral of the T8 spinous process.
The trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles, and the TP of the vertebrae were visualised.
The needle was placed craniocaudally within the fascial plane of the deep surface of the erector spina muscle above the bone shadow of the TP.
The fluid dissemination was confirmed by raising the placement of the needle tip towards the erector spina muscle.
20ml 0.25% bupivacaine was applied to this region and the spread of local anaesthetic was observed
|
Paravertebral Block
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
No block has been done
|
No block has been done
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total tramadol consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Consumption at the end of 24 hours will be monitored by planning a 10mg bolus, a 10-minute lock-in time, through a patient-controlled analgesia device.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing
Time Frame: at 0, 5, 10,20 minutes and 1, 2,4 , 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively
|
11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain
|
at 0, 5, 10,20 minutes and 1, 2,4 , 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Analgesic drug consumption other than tramadol
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
in mg
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: preoperative, after insufflation, after exsufflation, after extubation( 5,10,20,30 minutes)
|
beats /min
|
preoperative, after insufflation, after exsufflation, after extubation( 5,10,20,30 minutes)
|
|
Mean arterial pressure (MAP)
Time Frame: preoperative, after insufflation, after exsufflation, after extubation( 5,10,20,30 minutes)
|
mm-hg
|
preoperative, after insufflation, after exsufflation, after extubation( 5,10,20,30 minutes)
|
|
Incidence of postoperative nausea & vomiting (PONV)
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Number of patients developing PONV
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Shoulder pain
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Number of patients developing shoulder pain
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: elvan tekir yilmaz, Giresun University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021/ 283
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.