Effectiveness of US-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment

May 3, 2023 updated by: Ahmed Abou Elezz Abdel Fattah, Benha University

A Retrospective Single Centered Cohort Study Comparing The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous nephrolithotomyin different positions supine, prone positions and flank suspend supine position in renal stones treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the choice of modality for the treatment of large and complicated renal calculi. Initially, percutaneous access to the kidney was only performed in the prone position, as described sixty years ago.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
123

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Benha, Egypt
        • Benha University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

123 patients who underwent Percutaneous nephrolithotomy at the period from 2018 to 2022 and were diagnosed with consecutive, adult obese patients (age >18-70 years) with renal stones diameter ≥2 cm

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who underwent Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Patient's age from >18 - 70 years old.
  • Body mass index (30-40 kg/m2).
  • Both sex
  • Renal stones diameter ≥2 cm
  • Cardiac patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients with renal anomalies.
  • Transplanted kidney.
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy, or active infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Flank suspended supine position percutaneous nephrolithotomy
This group included 41 patients in flank suspended supine position percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Procedure: Flank suspended supine position percutaneous nephrolithotomy
The patients will be placed in the supine position with the shoulder and the buttock will be raised by a 3-l bag of water suspending the flank of the affected side. The body contour will be aligned to the edge of the table. The operating table will be adjusted to the jack knife position, with the tip of the lower part of the table will be slightly lowered. The leg of the affected side of the patent will be straightened dorsally flexed and slightly inner rotated, with the knee of the other side will be flexed. The patients will be then immobilized at the chest and the pelvis with two adherent tapes which crossed each other at the abdomen to form a 'V' shape.
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy group
This group included 41 patients in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Procedure: Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy group
The patient will remain in the supine position, with the side of interest at the edge of the table, with a small cushion placed under the flank to elevate it 15-20°.
Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy group
This group included 41 patients in prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Procedure: Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy group
Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The prone position (PRON) technique followed these classic steps: patients will be placed in a lithotomy position and a ureteral catheter will be inserted through a rigid cystoscope to perform a retrograde pyelogram. The ureteral catheter will be fixed to a Foley catheter, and then the patient will be repositioned to the prone position with pads under their shoulders.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone clearance rate
Time Frame: 3 months postoperatively
Comparison of stone clearance rates among different positions (flank suspended supine, supine, and prone) in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of renal stones.
3 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
duration of the Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure among different positions
Intraoperatively
Complication rates
Time Frame: 48 hours Postoperatively
Comparison of postoperative complications (e.g., bleeding, infection, injury) among the different positions.
48 hours Postoperatively
Stone-free rates
Time Frame: 48 hours Postoperatively
Comparison of the percentage of patients achieving complete stone clearance among the different positions.
48 hours Postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Benha University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC 14-4-2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study will be available under a reasonable request from the corresponding author

IPD Sharing Time Frame

One year after the end of the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings