The Effect of Training Prepared in Line With Fracture Liaison Service Model on Frailty in Hip Surgery Patients
The Effect of Training Prepared in Line With the Fracture Liaison Service Model in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery on Patients' Fragility Level, Care Dependence, and Fear of Movement: A Randomized Controlled Study
This study is a randomized controlled experimental research with pretest-posttest control group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the training prepared in line with the fracture liaison service model on the level of frailty, care dependency and fear of movement in patients undergoing hip surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are as follows:
- Does the training provided to patients undergoing hip surgery in line with the fracture liaison service model have an effect on the level of frailty of patients?
- Does the training provided to patients undergoing hip surgery in line with the fracture liaison service model have an effect on patients' care dependency?
- Does the education given to patients undergoing hip surgery in line with the fracture liaison service model have an effect on patients' fear of movement? It is very important to prevent secondary fractures that may occur in patients undergoing hip surgery. Therefore, the most appropriate prevention interventions to reduce fractures in patients depend on the risk profile and the place of education for hospitalized patients is very important. In this study, Personal Information Collection Form, Patient Follow-up Form, Edmonton Frailty Scale, Causes of Kinesiophobia Scale and Care Dependency Scale will be applied to control and intervention group patients. It is planned to provide training to the intervention group patients in line with the fracture liaison service model. This study will evaluate the effect of the training on patients' level of frailty, care dependency and fear of movement.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Halise Cinar
- Phone Number: +905424633771
- Email: halise.cinar@adu.edu.tr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nurdan Gezer
- Phone Number: 05069282109
- Email: ngezer@adu.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
Aydin
-
Efeler, Aydin, Turkey
- Recruiting
- Aydin Adnan Menderes University
-
Contact:
- Halise Cinar
- Phone Number: +905424633771
- Email: halise.cinar@adu.edu.tr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Halise Cinar
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nurdan Gezer, Phd
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 65 years of age or older
- Being diagnosed with osteoporosis
- Being conscious and able to answer questions
- Not having a problem that would prevent communication
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 65 years of age with fractures
- Patients with Parkinson's disease
- Patients with visual and hearing impairment
- Patients undergoing hip surgery for the second time
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
|
The Effect of Education Prepared in Line with Fracture Liaison Service Model on Patients' Frailty Level, Care Dependency and Fear of Movement in Hip Surgery Patients
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Personal Information Collection Form
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The form prepared by the researchers with the support of the literature includes questions about the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients (gender, age, height, weight, educational status, etc.).
This form will be used in the first interview with the patients.
|
Baseline
|
|
Patient Follow-up Form
Time Frame: 3 days after the operation
|
With this form, complications and problems that patients may experience in the postoperative period will be evaluated and the observed complications and problems will be marked on the patient follow-up form.
Patients will be followed up for 3 months with this form
|
3 days after the operation
|
|
Patient Follow-up Form
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the operation
|
With this form, complications and problems that patients may experience in the postoperative period will be evaluated and the observed complications and problems will be marked on the patient follow-up form.
Patients will be followed up for 3 months with this form
|
3 weeks after the operation
|
|
Patient Follow-up Form
Time Frame: 3 months after the operation
|
With this form, complications and problems that patients may experience in the postoperative period will be evaluated and the observed complications and problems will be marked on the patient follow-up form.
Patients will be followed up for 3 months with this form
|
3 months after the operation
|
|
Edmonton Frailty Scale
Time Frame: 3 days after the operation
|
Edmonton Frailty Scale was developed by Rolfson et al. (2006) to assess frailty in elderly individuals.
The scale consists of 9 frailty dimensions included in the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and accepted as determinants of frailty.
These frailty dimensions include cognitive status, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence and functional status.
The scale consists of 11 items in total.
The 'clock test' is used to assess cognitive status and the 'Timed Up and Go test' is used to assess functional performance.
|
3 days after the operation
|
|
Edmonton Frailty Scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the operation
|
Edmonton Frailty Scale was developed by Rolfson et al. (2006) to assess frailty in elderly individuals.
The scale consists of 9 frailty dimensions included in the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and accepted as determinants of frailty.
These frailty dimensions include cognitive status, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence and functional status.
The scale consists of 11 items in total.
The 'clock test' is used to assess cognitive status and the 'Timed Up and Go test' is used to assess functional performance.
|
3 weeks after the operation
|
|
Edmonton Frailty Scale
Time Frame: 3 months after the operation
|
Edmonton Frailty Scale was developed by Rolfson et al. (2006) to assess frailty in elderly individuals.
The scale consists of 9 frailty dimensions included in the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and accepted as determinants of frailty.
These frailty dimensions include cognitive status, general health status, functional independence, social support, medication use, nutrition, mood, continence and functional status.
The scale consists of 11 items in total.
The 'clock test' is used to assess cognitive status and the 'Timed Up and Go test' is used to assess functional performance.
|
3 months after the operation
|
|
Causes of Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: 3 days after the operation
|
The Causes of Kinesiophobia Scale (CNS) is a 20-question questionnaire developed by Kocjan and Knapik (2015) to diagnose and determine the causes of motor inactivity.
The CNS consists of a total of 20 questions and two subscales.
|
3 days after the operation
|
|
Causes of Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the operation
|
The Causes of Kinesiophobia Scale (CNS) is a 20-question questionnaire developed by Kocjan and Knapik (2015) to diagnose and determine the causes of motor inactivity.
The CNS consists of a total of 20 questions and two subscales.
|
3 weeks after the operation
|
|
Causes of Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: 3 months after the operation
|
The Causes of Kinesiophobia Scale (CNS) is a 20-question questionnaire developed by Kocjan and Knapik (2015) to diagnose and determine the causes of motor inactivity.
The CNS consists of a total of 20 questions and two subscales.
|
3 months after the operation
|
|
Care Dependency Scale
Time Frame: 3 days after the operation
|
The Care Dependency Scale is a scale based on Virginia Henderson's human needs and developed to assess the care dependency status of patients.
The Care Dependency Scale includes various physical and psychological aspects and provides a comprehensive assessment of the patient's care dependency.
This scale was developed by Dijkstra in 1998.
The items included in the scale are nutrition, continence, body posture, mobility, day/night cycle, dressing and undressing, body temperature, body cleanliness, avoiding hazards, communication, communicating with others, worshipping, following rules, daily activities, recreational activities and learning ability.
|
3 days after the operation
|
|
Care Dependency Scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks after the operation
|
The Care Dependency Scale is a scale based on Virginia Henderson's human needs and developed to assess the care dependency status of patients.
The Care Dependency Scale includes various physical and psychological aspects and provides a comprehensive assessment of the patient's care dependency.
This scale was developed by Dijkstra in 1998.
The items included in the scale are nutrition, continence, body posture, mobility, day/night cycle, dressing and undressing, body temperature, body cleanliness, avoiding hazards, communication, communicating with others, worshipping, following rules, daily activities, recreational activities and learning ability.
|
3 weeks after the operation
|
|
Care Dependency Scale
Time Frame: 3 months after the operation
|
The Care Dependency Scale is a scale based on Virginia Henderson's human needs and developed to assess the care dependency status of patients.
The Care Dependency Scale includes various physical and psychological aspects and provides a comprehensive assessment of the patient's care dependency.
This scale was developed by Dijkstra in 1998.
The items included in the scale are nutrition, continence, body posture, mobility, day/night cycle, dressing and undressing, body temperature, body cleanliness, avoiding hazards, communication, communicating with others, worshipping, following rules, daily activities, recreational activities and learning ability.
|
3 months after the operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Halise Cinar, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Turkey
- Study Chair: Nurdan Gezer, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Turkey
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Halise03
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.