Patient Satisfaction for Digital Versus Conventional Maxillary Obturator
Patient Satisfaction With Conventional Maxillary Obturator Versus Fully Digital Fabricated With 3D Printing: a Randomized Crossover Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
ElGharbia
-
Tanta, ElGharbia, Egypt, 31512
- marwa Mohammed Amer
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with hemimaxillectomy defect (Aramany class 1)
- almost edentulous mandible with healthy remaining teeth,
- mouth opening is not less than 25 mm, intact soft palate
- participants were not exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the previous year
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with physical or mental disorders.
- patients still receiving radio or chemotherapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: conventional obturator
maxillary obturator fabricated from cast metal framework, heat-cured acrylic resin
|
restoration of midline maxillary defect with obturator made of cast metal , heat cure acrylic resin
|
|
Experimental: 3 d printed obturator
3d printed obturator with full digital workflow ( intraoral scanning, made of selective laser melting, 3d printed resin
|
restoration of midline maxillary defect with obturator made of SLM metal , 3 d printed resin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
obturator functioning scale
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The Obturator Functioning Scale ( minimum value is "1"and maximum value is "5"
|
6 months
|
|
patient outcome the treatment time, on the self-perception of the applied impression protocol in terms of general convenience, anxiety, taste, nausea sensation and possible pain sensation.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
questions focused on general convenience, anxiety, taste, nausea sensation and possible pain sensation, assessed through visual analogue scale (VAS)
|
6 months
|
|
operator outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Questions focused on the treatment time, on the self-perception of the applied impression
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: marwa M Amer, Tanta University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- prosth 6/23
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.