Efficacy Mydrane ® for Cataract Surgery in Patients With Concomitant Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. (MIGA)

July 4, 2023 updated by: Ricci Francesco, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Efficacy of the Intracamerally Administered Mydriatics for Cataract Surgery in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma.

The aim of this study is to compare Mydrane ®, mydriatic eye drops and Mydriasert ® in terms of pupil site stability, surgical time, visual field and anterior chamber configuration modifications among primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients during cataract extraction surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

60 patients with coexisting POAG and cataract who underwent elective cataract extraction. All patients underwent ophthalmic routine examinations including automatic visual field examination, anterior chamber configuration, specular microscopy and arterial blood pressure measurement prior to surgery, 24 hours and 30 days postoperatively. All cataract surgeries were videorecorded, and all measurements were performed using media player. 20 patients received topical mydriatic eye drops, 20 patients received Mydriasert ® whereas 20 patients received intracameral injection of Mydrane ® just after the first incision.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Roma, Italy, 00168
        • Policlinico Gemelli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients >18 years of age
  • diagnosed with age-related cataract with concomitant POAG well controlled by pharmacological therapy (IOP within its target during the entire day in a minimum of 12-month follow-up with constant use of anti-glaucoma medications)
  • required cataract extraction under local anesthesia
  • no history of previous surgery in the study eye

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with POAG requiring glaucoma surgery
  • ocular trauma or infection
  • other forms of glaucoma
  • pseudo-exfoliation and exfoliation syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group 1: Mydriatic Eyedrops
Group 1 patients included instillation of one drop each of tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10% ( VISUMIDRIATIC FENILEFRINA) at 30, 20, and 10 min prior to surgery.
Drug: Efficacy of a Standardized Intracameral Combination of Mydriatics and Anesthetic (Mydrane ®) for Cataract Surgery in Patients With Concomitant Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
60 patients with coexisting POAG and cataract who underwent elective cataract extraction. All patients underwent ophthalmic routine examinations including automatic visual field examination, anterior chamber configuration, specular microscopy and arterial blood pressure measurement prior to surgery, 24 hours and 30 days postoperatively. All cataract surgeries were videorecorded, and all measurements were performed using media player. 20 patients received topical mydriatic eye drops, 20 patients received Mydriasert ® whereas 20 patients received intracameral injection of Mydrane ® just after the first incision.
Experimental: Group 2: Insert Device Mydriasert®
Group 2 patients had the Mydriasert® (Phenylephrine Hydrochloride,Tropicamide) device placed in the inferior conjunctival sac at least 1 h before surgery
Drug: Efficacy of a Standardized Intracameral Combination of Mydriatics and Anesthetic (Mydrane ®) for Cataract Surgery in Patients With Concomitant Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
60 patients with coexisting POAG and cataract who underwent elective cataract extraction. All patients underwent ophthalmic routine examinations including automatic visual field examination, anterior chamber configuration, specular microscopy and arterial blood pressure measurement prior to surgery, 24 hours and 30 days postoperatively. All cataract surgeries were videorecorded, and all measurements were performed using media player. 20 patients received topical mydriatic eye drops, 20 patients received Mydriasert ® whereas 20 patients received intracameral injection of Mydrane ® just after the first incision.
Experimental: Group 3: Intracameral Anesthesia Mydrane®
Group 3 patients received 0.2 mL intracameral Mydrane®(0.2 mg/ml + 3.1 mg/ml + 10 mg/ml tropicamide, lidocaine hydrochloride, phenylephrine hydrochloride) immediately following the clear corneal incision; the surgeon allowed 45-60 s for adequate pupil dilation before performing continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC)
Drug: Efficacy of a Standardized Intracameral Combination of Mydriatics and Anesthetic (Mydrane ®) for Cataract Surgery in Patients With Concomitant Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
60 patients with coexisting POAG and cataract who underwent elective cataract extraction. All patients underwent ophthalmic routine examinations including automatic visual field examination, anterior chamber configuration, specular microscopy and arterial blood pressure measurement prior to surgery, 24 hours and 30 days postoperatively. All cataract surgeries were videorecorded, and all measurements were performed using media player. 20 patients received topical mydriatic eye drops, 20 patients received Mydriasert ® whereas 20 patients received intracameral injection of Mydrane ® just after the first incision.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stability of mydriasis
Time Frame: 1 hour
All cataract surgeries were video-recorded, and all measurements were performed using media player software (VideoLAN Non-Profit Organization, Paris, France) with two different operators (M.R. and F.R.) based on the images acquired immediately prior to the corneal incision (T1), injection of the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) (T2), capsulorhexis (T3), IOL insertion (T4), and cefuroxime injection (end of surgery) (T5). The pupil size immediately prior to the capsulorhexis was defined as the maximum mydriasis. We recorded all the surgery with OPMI LUMERA® 700 ZEISS and then measured with media player software all the pupil size.
1 hour
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: 1 hour
mean duration of surgery, All cataract surgeries were video-recorded, and all measurements were performed using media player software (VideoLAN Non-Profit Organization, Paris, France) with two different operators (M.R. and F.R.) based on the images acquired immediately prior to the corneal incision (T1), injection of the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) (T2), capsulorhexis (T3), IOL insertion (T4), and cefuroxime injection (end of surgery) (T5).
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual field defects
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
The 30-2 SITA STANDARD algorithm (HFAII740: Humphrey Field Analyzer II; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) was used for the standard automatic visual field examination of all the patients to investigate the visual field defects, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD) modifications at baseline and 30 days postoperatively. Visual field testing was performed with visual correction in a dark room.
up to 4 weeks
Anterior segment parameters variations
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Anterior chamber depth (ACD) and both nasal and temporal iridocorneal angles were measured by a single experienced operator who obtained a horizontal scan, including sections of the nasal and temporal quadrants of all the patients, using AS-OCT (Visante, software version 2.01.88; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) in a dark room with the images centered on the pupil . High-resolution images were taken in the anterior segment single-scan mode along the horizontal meridian with the subjects seated.When the corneal reflex was visible, the image was captured. ACD (from the corneal endothelium to the anterior surface of the crystalline lens) were then measured (ACD was obtained using the on-screen calibrated caliper function).
up to 4 weeks
Pain experience
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire using the the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale to evaluate surgical pain related to the procedure. The scale simply consists of a 10 cm strip of paper which has two "end points" at the ends which are defined as "no pain" and "the worst pain I can imagine".
up to 4 weeks
Central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal endothelium cell density (CD) changes
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks
Specular microscopy values were evaluated by using the Perseus (CSO, Italy) The Perseus specular microscope is a non-contact automated instrument with auto alignment and a touch screen that automatically conducts studies for measuring endothelial cell layer density using the corner method to analyze the endothelial cells. The instrument has a reliability index that evaluates the quality of acquisition, this is based on a calculation of the percentage of the total endothelium area relative to the maximum number of countable endothelial cells per field (edited area). Corneal endothelial cell density (CD) is calculable using a units of measure based on cells/mm2.
up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: francesco ricci, Policlinico Gemelli

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 4, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4654

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings