AI-assisted Preoperative Planning Technology for THA for DDH
Short-term Outcome of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Preoperative Three-dimensional Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Compared With Traditional Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ningxia
-
Yinchuan, Ningxia, China, 750001
- General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- DDH was diagnosed by clinical signs and imaging examination, and a primary THA was planned;
- the patient had persistent unilateral hip pain, which seriously affected their quality of life;
- the standard posterolateral approach was used;
- the contralateral hip was normal or had received THA;
- the proximal femoral Dorr classification was type A or B;
- The acetabular classification was Crowe type Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ or IV;
- all patients were treated with the bioartificial hip joint PINNACLE® cup or SUMMIT® stem, developed by Johnson & Johnson Biological.
Exclusion Criteria:
- preoperative and postoperative imaging examinations did not meet the evaluation criteria (non-standard double-hip anteroposterior film, acetabular angle and LL length could not be accurately measured);
- severe osteoporosis, tumour or metabolic disease around the affected hip joint;
- spinal deformity by other causes or a history of lumbar internal fixation;
- external deformity of the affected hip joint in the lower extremity;
- neuromuscular insufficiency (with hip abduction weakness and poliomyelitis);
- severe disease with intolerance to surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
control group
|
A traditional X-ray film template was used to complete the preoperative design in the traditional planning group.
The position and size of the prosthesis, the level of femoral neck osteotomy, the length of the LLs and the restoration of eccentricity were estimated by X-ray.
A plastic template provided by the manufacturer was used to take the line of the lower edge of the teardrop on both sides as the horizontal reference line, and the acetabular template was placed at 40 abduction on the inner edge of the teardrop so that the lower edge of the acetabular cup was adjacent to the teardrop.
An appropriate type of acetabular component was selected to fill the acetabulum and maintain coverage, and the femoral component that best matched the femoral medullary cavity was chosen.
The height of the osteotomy was determined, and the planning model was recorded after the surgeons were happy with the placement and outcome.
|
|
observation group
|
In the AI planning group, AI was used to assist in the 3D planning to complete the preoperative design.
Preoperative planning was performed by two experienced surgeons and without the chief physician to ensure that the results of the preoperative planning did not affect the selection of intraoperative procedures and prosthesis size.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Type of acetabular cup and femoral stem
Time Frame: 31 months
|
Accuracy analysis of planning model and the practical model
|
31 months
|
|
Difference in the length of lower limbs before and after surgery
Time Frame: 31 months
|
Prove the accuracy of the artificial intelligence planning group
|
31 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- lipeng2023
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.