24 Gy in One Fraction Urethral-sparing "HDR Like" SBRT for Prostate Cancer (PRO-FAST)

June 6, 2025 updated by: Nadia Di Muzio, IRCCS San Raffaele

24 Gy in One Fraction Urethral-sparing "High-Dose-Rate Like" Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy for Prostate Cancer: a Single-center Non-randomized Prospective Clinical Study (PRO-FAST)

Patients with prostate cancer who are candidates for stereotactic radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles will undergo staging exams, which will include prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). If the PET scan is negative and the uroflowmetry is acceptable, the patients will perform the treatment, after fiducial implantation, simulation CT and magnetic resonance (MR), in a single fraction, delivered with a high-dose-rate (HDR)-like urethral sparing technique. In 70 patients, acute and late toxicity, biochemical control, overall survival, cancer specific-survival, and quality of life (through specific questionnaires) will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an interventional prospective non-randomised single-center trial that will enroll, 13 patients for the first phase of the study, according to the optimal design of Simon. The hypothesis is that the proportion of patients free from acute cumulative G3-G4 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-CTCAE v5.0 scale) 1 month after the end of treatment must be < 85% to suspend treatment and > 95% to consider the treatment as safe.

The treatment will be interrupted if G3-G4 toxicities and/or biochemical recurrences are recorded within a month in 2 or more patients; otherwise the study will continue with the second phase. Another 52 patients will be added, for a total of 65 patients. The treatment consists in a single fraction of 24 Gy with the "urethral sparing HDR like" technique. Assuming a minimal drop-out, given that the primary endpoint is toxicity one month after treatment, we will enroll 5 more patients in total, thus reaching a total number of 70 patients (65 necessary + 5 for any drop-outs).

In the absence of worse subsequent toxicity, and with biochemical control comparable to that in the literature as well as historical treatments in our Radiation Oncology, the scheme will be considered safe, and the enrollment will continue open label.

Patients with negative lymph nodes and without distant metastases will be enrolled and treated on the prostate/prostate and tumor vesicles (depending on the stage) at a total dose of 24 Gy delivered in a single fraction, sparing the urethra and with a dose distribution similar to high dose rate brachytherapy. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) will be prescribed according to the guidelines for the stages of the disease.

Short-term cortisone and alpha lytics will be prescribed, for prophylactic purposes. Follow-up visits will be performed at 1, 3, 6,12,18, 24, 36, 48, 60 months with blood tests including prostate specific antigen (PSA) and testosterone (performed every 3 months in the first two years, every 6 months in the next 3 years), imaging, when needed, and quality of life questionnaires: European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) C30 and QLQ-PR25, International Prostate symptoms score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)- 26.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • MI
      • Milan, MI, Italy, 20132
        • Recruiting
        • San Raffaele Scientific Institute
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade groups 1-5
  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Signed informed consent
  • Negative lymph nodes confirmed by imaging (PSMA PET/CT and/or pelvic MRI with and without contrast medium) where recommended by guidelines (intermediate and high risk patients, according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines) in the previous 3 months
  • Clinical M0 (PSMA PET/CT and/or bone scan and/or pelvic MRI with and without contrast medium in suspected patients and unfavorable intermediate and high risk patients, according to NCCN guidelines), in the previous 3 months
  • Acceptable uroflowmetry: peak urine flow index (peak flow preferably ≥ 15 ml/s), post voiding residue (PVR) ≤50 cc. If lower, acceptable if, by carrying out 3 months of neoadjuvant hormone therapy + alpha-lytic for the reduction of prostate volume, uroflowmetry is reset to at least ≥ 12 ml/s.
  • PS (ECOG) ≤2
  • No previous pelvic radiotherapy
  • Other conditions necessary for the correct execution of the proposed treatment (ability to fill in the questionnaires for the evaluation of the Quality of Life EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-PR25, IPSS, IIEF-5, EPIC 26)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious systemic diseases
  • Psychic or other disorders that may prevent the patient from signing the informed consent
  • Previous invasive cancer, except skin cancer (excluding melanoma) unless patient free of disease for at least 3 years (e.g. carcinoma in situ of the oral cavity or bladder)
  • Lymph node disease (N1)
  • Evidence of distant metastases (M1)
  • IPSS questionnaire data > 20 points
  • Uroflowmetry with maximum basal flow ≤ 11 ml/sec and/or PVR >100 ml
  • Concomitant urinary/gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease)
  • Overactive bladder
  • Impossibility of implantation of fiducials
  • Inability or refusal to place bladder catheter for simulation CT and MR
  • Inability to perform simulation MRI
  • Contraindication for hormonal treatment for patients with unfavorable intermediate, high or very high risk disease
  • Non-compliance with dose limits established in the treatment plan

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 24 Gy in one fraction, urethral sparing HDR like
Patients with localized prostate cancer - negative PSMA PET CT +/- standard staging exams (bone scan, CT, MRI)-enrolled in this study, will be treated to prostate/prostate seminal vesicles (according to the risk group) to a total dose of 24 Gy delivered in 1 fraction, with a urethral sparing HDR like technique. For unfavorable intermediate and high-risk pts, Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) will be prescribed for 6 and 24 months, respectively. The procedure will be performed in just one day, from fiducials implantation to radiation treatment delivery.
Radiation: prostate SBRT
Patients with prostate cancer will be treated with high-dose SBRT to prostate and seminal vesicles, delivered in one fraction, sparing the urethra and generating a dose distribution similar to HDR brachytherapy
Other Names:
  • ultrahypofractionation
  • extreme hypofractionation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute toxicity
Time Frame: one month
Incidence of acute toxicity of grade 3 or 4 as maximum toxicity value during the radiation treatment or in any case within a month of the end of SBRT, using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 scale (toxicity from 0- patients without toxicity to 5-death from toxicity)
one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biochemical control
Time Frame: 5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Biochemical control rate at 1,3 and 5 years by measuring Prostate Specific Antigen-PSA- value which must be below (2+nadir) ng/ml
5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Biochemical relapse
Time Frame: 5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Biochemical Relapse-Free survival
5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Local Control
Time Frame: 5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Local Relapse-Free survival
5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Distant Disease Control
Time Frame: 5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Distant Metastases-Free Survival
5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Survival
Time Frame: 5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Overall Survival
5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Subacute Toxicity
Time Frame: 3 months
Subacute toxicity rated on CTCAE v5.0 scale (see Outcome 1 for details)
3 months
Late Toxicity
Time Frame: 5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Late toxicity rated on using CTCAE v5.0 scale (see Outcome 1 for details)
5 years (with interim analyzes at 1 and 3 years)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed with general quality of life questionnaires
Time Frame: 5 years
Survey with the questionnaire of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life of cancer patients (QLQ C30) which contains 30 questions on patients' quality of life with answers from 1, lowest grade, to 4, highest grade
5 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed with prostate specific quality of life questionnaires
Time Frame: 5 years
Survey with the questionnaire of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life of prostate cancer patients (QLQ PR25) which contains 25 questions on patients' quality of life with answers from 1, lowest grade, to 4, highest grade
5 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed with urinary quality of life questionnaires
Time Frame: 5 years
Survey with the questionnaire International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) which has 8 questions with answers rom never (0) to almost every time (5). The score is obtained by summing the answers
5 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed with erectile quality of life questionnaires
Time Frame: 5 years
Survey with the questionnaire IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function). The IIEF-5 score is the sum of the ordinal responses to the 5 items, with higher scores indicating no erectile dysfunction and lower scors indicating severe erectile dysfunction.
5 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed with composite quality of life questionnaires
Time Frame: 5 years
Survey with the questionnaire EPIC-26 (The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) a questionnaire designed to measure Quality of Life issues in patients with Prostate cancer, through 13 questions with answers from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating the absence of the problem and 5 indicating an important problem. Lower scores indicate a better outcome
5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Organ movement
Time Frame: 3 years
Modeling of organ movements during treatment: Movements of the target and neighboring organs between the treatment fractions and during the treatment will be quantified in millimeters, the median value will be recorded with the range and mean with the standard deviation, and the contributing factors will be identified to find a useful solution
3 years
Radiomics
Time Frame: 5 years ( with interim analyzes at 3 years)
Evaluation of radiomic characteristics: Mathematical extraction of the spatial distribution of signal intensities and pixel interrelationships of medical images of the patients, to quantify textural information resampled according to International Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI).
5 years ( with interim analyzes at 3 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IRCCS San Raffaele

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Nadia Di Muzio, Prof, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
  • Study Chair: Andrei Fodor, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PRO-FAST

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study (anonymized individual participant data) are available on request from the corresponding author to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Requests made to the corresponding author will be evaluated by the IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Ethics Committee.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

5 years after the end of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Request made to PI prof. Nadia Di Muzio or co-PI Dr. Andrei Fodor, approved by Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) San Raffaele Ethics Committee

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Localized Prostate Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on prostate SBRT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings