Amelioration of Literacy Deficits in Prenatal Care
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary aim of the study is to develop and evaluate a skills-based, interactive computer intervention designed to enhance the communication skills of pregnant women with restricted literacy. To this end, a randomized trial compared a skill-based computer intervention to a facilitated review of pertinent print-based educational material on communication processes and its consequences. Intervention impact was evaluated through medical visit recordings and post-visit assessments by patients and clinicians. We hypothesized that women assigned to the skills-based, computer intervention would demonstrate greater use of targeted skills, be more actively engaged in the communication process, and experience more patient-centered visits than women assigned to the print-based intervention. We also hypothesized that computer use would result in greater visit satisfaction and closer patient and clinician alignment in their assessment of the patient's physical and emotional health status..
Study Design included 84 women seeing 19 obstetrical clinicians were randomized to use an interactive, skill-based, computer program or to a personalized review of a prenatal guide. Prenatal visits were recorded and coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Post-visit satisfaction and perceptions of physical and emotional health were reported. Analysis adjusted for the nesting of patients within physicians, gestation, literacy and visit length.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women attending study prenatal clinics with consenting clinicians. English speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Healthy Babies and Health Moms
Healthy Babies and Healthy Moms was designed as a 20-minute communication skills-based computer program based on key social learning principles designed to empower women to more actively and productively use targetted skills to improve the medical dialogue of their prenatal visits.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Baby Basics Prenatal Guide
The Baby Basics Prenatal Guide, published by the What to Expect Foundation, was used in a face-to-face educational session with a study research assistant during which pregnancy related information was personalized by reviewing relevant sections of the Baby Basics prenatal guide.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
patient-centered communication
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Audio recordings of the prenatal visits are coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS).
The communication outcome measure is derived from this coding.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
depression as assessed by the Edinburgh Depression Scale
Time Frame: post medical visit up to 8 months
|
The correlation between patient score on the The Edinburgh Depression Scale and the clinician's rating of signs of emotional state.
The Edinburgh has 10 items items on a 4 point scale with score range 10-40.
Higher scores indicating more symptoms of depression.
Clinician completed a novel post visit assessment of the participant's emotional state asking to indicate signs of anxiety and depression observed during the recorded visit. 1 (no signs), 2 (some symptoms, but no illness), ), 3 (mild case), 4 (moderate case), 5 (severe case).
Higher ratings indicated more significant anxiety and depression.
|
post medical visit up to 8 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
patient satisfaction as assessed by a questionnaire developed by the study team
Time Frame: post medical visit up to 8 months
|
Patient satisfaction with medical visit as assessed by a questionnaire developed by the study team.
The measure consisted of 8 items on a 5-point scale ranging from poor (1) to excellent (5).
Scale scores range from 8- 40.
|
post medical visit up to 8 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Debra Roter, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HD050437
- R01HD050437 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.