Amelioration of Literacy Deficits in Prenatal Care

The purpose of the study was to develop and evaluate a skill-based, computer intervention designed to facilitate effective prenatal visit communication for women with restricted literacy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary aim of the study is to develop and evaluate a skills-based, interactive computer intervention designed to enhance the communication skills of pregnant women with restricted literacy. To this end, a randomized trial compared a skill-based computer intervention to a facilitated review of pertinent print-based educational material on communication processes and its consequences. Intervention impact was evaluated through medical visit recordings and post-visit assessments by patients and clinicians. We hypothesized that women assigned to the skills-based, computer intervention would demonstrate greater use of targeted skills, be more actively engaged in the communication process, and experience more patient-centered visits than women assigned to the print-based intervention. We also hypothesized that computer use would result in greater visit satisfaction and closer patient and clinician alignment in their assessment of the patient's physical and emotional health status..

Study Design included 84 women seeing 19 obstetrical clinicians were randomized to use an interactive, skill-based, computer program or to a personalized review of a prenatal guide. Prenatal visits were recorded and coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Post-visit satisfaction and perceptions of physical and emotional health were reported. Analysis adjusted for the nesting of patients within physicians, gestation, literacy and visit length.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

355

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women attending study prenatal clinics with consenting clinicians. English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Healthy Babies and Health Moms
Healthy Babies and Healthy Moms was designed as a 20-minute communication skills-based computer program based on key social learning principles designed to empower women to more actively and productively use targetted skills to improve the medical dialogue of their prenatal visits.
Active Comparator: Baby Basics Prenatal Guide
The Baby Basics Prenatal Guide, published by the What to Expect Foundation, was used in a face-to-face educational session with a study research assistant during which pregnancy related information was personalized by reviewing relevant sections of the Baby Basics prenatal guide.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient-centered communication
Time Frame: Baseline
Audio recordings of the prenatal visits are coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). The communication outcome measure is derived from this coding.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
depression as assessed by the Edinburgh Depression Scale
Time Frame: post medical visit up to 8 months
The correlation between patient score on the The Edinburgh Depression Scale and the clinician's rating of signs of emotional state. The Edinburgh has 10 items items on a 4 point scale with score range 10-40. Higher scores indicating more symptoms of depression. Clinician completed a novel post visit assessment of the participant's emotional state asking to indicate signs of anxiety and depression observed during the recorded visit. 1 (no signs), 2 (some symptoms, but no illness), ), 3 (mild case), 4 (moderate case), 5 (severe case). Higher ratings indicated more significant anxiety and depression.
post medical visit up to 8 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction as assessed by a questionnaire developed by the study team
Time Frame: post medical visit up to 8 months
Patient satisfaction with medical visit as assessed by a questionnaire developed by the study team. The measure consisted of 8 items on a 5-point scale ranging from poor (1) to excellent (5). Scale scores range from 8- 40.
post medical visit up to 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Debra Roter, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HD050437
  • R01HD050437 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Literacy

Clinical Trials on Healthy Babies and Healthy Moms

Subscribe