The Resting-state EEG Gamma Oscillations in Alzheimer's Disease (EEG)

August 17, 2023 updated by: Görsev Yener, MD, PhD

The Underestimated Utility of Resting-state Gamma Oscillations: Both Increase and Decrease of Gamma Discriminates Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Patients From Healthy Individuals

The literature suggests a strong association between amyloid accumulation and gamma alterations, emerging gamma activity as a biomarker candidate for Alzheimer's pathology. The present study aims to investigate resting-state gamma activity changes in Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-proven early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) patients with a holistic approach that employs structural and functional brain neuroimaging techniques, and neuropsychological aspects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This cross-sectional study included 24 drug-naive CSF-proven EOAD patients and age-, sex, and education-matched healthy controls. All participants underwent a detailed neuropsychological evaluation, resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) recording, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Gamma power and coherence were measured in total gamma (30-48 Hz), gamma-1 (30-35 Hz), gamma-2 (35-40 Hz), and gamma-3 (40-48 Hz) frequency bands. Gray matter volumes were extracted for 54 regions of interest (ROIs) and compared between groups. Discriminant analysis was performed to determine the classification accuracy of gamma activity for EOAD. Finally, correlations between CSF, neuropsychological tests, EEG, and MRI measures were explored.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • İzmir, Turkey
        • Izmir University of Economics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The present study included a retrospective investigation of EEG and MRI data. The total sample for the study consisted of 24 early-onset Alzheimer's disease patients and 24 healthy controls.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For all participants: Age < 65
  • For EOAD patients: Meeting National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria.
  • For healthy controls: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) >25 Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) = 8

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For EOAD patients: MMSE > 24 Geriatric depression scale (GDS) > 14 Having treatment with antipsychotics and comorbidities that may affect cognitive abilities.
  • For healthy controls: Having neurological and/or cognitive abnormalities Having a history of neurological, psychiatric, or systemic disorders, and alcohol/drug abuse. GDS > 14
  • For all participants: Having neurological (other than AD) or any other serious disease (cancer, systemic disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Healthy controls
Age-and gender-matched healthy volunteers were recruited via advertisements and word-of-mouth.
Early-onset Alzheimer's disease
Patients were recruited from the outpatient memory clinics of the Department of Neurology, Dokuz Eylül University Hospital. The patient group was diagnosed by an expert neurologist, according to the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease
Diagnostic test: CSF
Early-onset Alzheimer's disease patients underwent routine laboratory tests to obtain CSF samples. Also, all participants underwent structural MRI examinations and neuropsychological tests.
Other Names:
  • MRI
  • Neuropsychological tests

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG
Time Frame: Day 2
The resting state EEG recordings were acquired using Easy-Cap comprising 30 Ag/AgCl electrodes placed according to the international 10-20 system. Coherence and maximum peak power of the total gamma (30-48 Hz) and sub-gamma bands [gamma-1 (30-35 Hz), gamma-2 (35-40 Hz), and gamma-3 (40-48 Hz)] were measured for each participant.
Day 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discriminant Analysis
Time Frame: 3 months
The discriminative power of gamma measures (power and coherence) was investigated with discriminant analysis (DA).
3 months
Correlation Analysis
Time Frame: 3 months
Correlations between CSF, neuropsychological tests (NPT), EEG, and MRI measures were investigated.
3 months
MRI
Time Frame: Day 1
Participants underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging on a Philips Achieva 1.5 Tesla scanner. The gray matter volumes were obtained from the 3D-T1 weighted Turbo field echo (TFE) sequence (TR: 9ms, Time to Echo (TE): 4ms, Field-of-view (FOV): 240mm, matrix: 256, slice thickness: 1mm, numbers of signal averages (NSA): 1). The images were segmented into gray matter, white matter, and CSF with the default parameters of the CAT12 segmentation function. Only the gray matter calculations were compared between groups.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Görsev Yener, MD, PhD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 7, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 2, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DokuzEU EEG

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the contact person, upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings