Assessment of Novaloc and Locator Attachment Systems
Mechanical and Biological Assessment of Two Different Attachment Materials in Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture In-Vivo Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
14 Completely edentulous patients will be divided into two groups each group contains seven patients: Group One: Each patient will be restored with 4 implant retained maxillary overdenture using Peek retention inserts attachment system and Bone Level Ti-Zr implants.
Group Two: Each patient will be restored with 4 implant retained maxillary overdenture using Nylon retention insert attachment system and Bone Level Ti implants.
Bone height in millimeters will then be evaluated around each implant using cone beam computed tomography at the time of placement of attachments, 6 months, 1 year
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11591
- Prosthodontics Department Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Completely edentulous patient with u shaped dental arch.
- Systemically free.
- Patients completed all extraction at least 6 months before surgery.
- Patients Tempromandibular joint is free from any disease.
- Patient's mouth opening is proper for accessibility during surgery and implant placement.
- Sufficient bone level (length, and width) at implant placement site.
- Presence of enough bone height at implant site close to the maxillary sinus.
- Absence of sinus pneumatization.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Heavy smoker.
- Patients with bone diseases.
- Patients having a history of parafunctional habits.
- Patients with diabetes mellitus.
- Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
- Patients on any medications that reduce wound healing.
- Patients without sufficient bone level (height, width).
- Patients with sinus pneumatization.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Novaloc attachment
a newly developed device "novaloc attachment system"made of peek material and amorphous diamond like carbon.
|
Each patient will be restored with 4 implants retained maxillary overdenture with the assigned attachment
|
|
Active Comparator: locator attachment
a device with low-profile attachment used in cases of limited inter arch distance, provides excellent retention, possesses a self-aligning property and allow correction of implant divergence up to 20 degrees
|
Each patient will be restored with 4 implants retained maxillary overdenture with the assigned attachment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
bone level change around implants
Time Frame: Through study completion an average 1 year.
|
measurement of bone height mesial, distal to each implant
|
Through study completion an average 1 year.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Through study completion an average 1 year.
|
Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire based on the visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients were asked to mark their answers (amount of satisfaction).
The questionnaire was given to the patients in Arabic.Six factors were rated on a 1 to 5 scale (highly satisfied = 5; satisfied = 4; fair = 3; dissatisfied = 2; highly dissatisfied = 1).
The sum of the five sub-scores was then calculated, ranging from 5 to 30 (best score = 30, worst score = 5).
The low range of scores indicated low satisfaction.
|
Through study completion an average 1 year.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Hany Ibrahim Eid, Prof, Ain shams university
- Study Director: Noha Helmy Nawwar, Prof, Ain shams university
- Study Director: Ahmed Mohamed Osama, Prof, Ain shams university
- Principal Investigator: Fatma Fouad Sadek, AssistantLec, Egyptian Russian University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FDASU- Rec ID 032117
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.