BullyDown, a Text Messaging-based Bullying Prevention Program for Middle School-aged Youth
Developing a Bullying Prevention Program That Transcends Physical Boundaries
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Clemente, California, United States, 92672-6745
- Center for Innovative Public Health Research
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-2100
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: BullyDown intervention
|
BullyDown is an 8 week, text messaging-based prevention program aimed to prevent bullying behaviors among middle school-aged youth.
Message content is based upon the social-emotional learning model.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Healthy lifestyle control
|
The attention-matched control will receive the messages for the same number of days as the intervention.
Content will talk about 'healthy lifestyle' topics, such as fitness and healthy social media use.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: Recruitment period
|
If at least 75% of eligible participants assent to participate, this will be supportive of a hypothesis of feasibility.
Note that a youth could assent and not be randomized if they did not complete the baseline survey.
|
Recruitment period
|
|
Acceptability of the Intervention
Time Frame: Intervention end, 9 weeks after program enrollment
|
Youth were asked: "How likely are you to recommend BullyDown to other people your age?" Answers were collected on a 5-point Likert scale.
The response option ranged from 1-5, with higher values reflecting greater acceptability.
An average score of 4 or higher was deemed supportive of program acceptability.
|
Intervention end, 9 weeks after program enrollment
|
|
Feasibility: Retention at 3-month Follow-up
Time Frame: 21 weeks post-randomization, 3 months after the 9-week program ended
|
A retention rate of 80% or higher was deemed to be supportive of a hypothesis of feasibility
|
21 weeks post-randomization, 3 months after the 9-week program ended
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Retention Rate at Program End
Time Frame: 9 weeks post-randomization
|
A retention rate of 80% or higher was deemed supportive of a hypothesis of feasibility.
|
9 weeks post-randomization
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of Bullying Perpetration in the Intervention Versus Control Group
Time Frame: Reported bullying perpetration behavior in the past 30 days at the end of the 9 week program
|
Bullying behaviors towards other youth the same age 3 or more times in the past 30 days
|
Reported bullying perpetration behavior in the past 30 days at the end of the 9 week program
|
|
Rates of Aggressive Behavior in the Intervention Versus Control Group
Time Frame: Reported aggressive behavior in the past 30 days at the end of the 9 week program
|
Youth who report aggressive acts towards others 1-2 times in the past 30 days
|
Reported aggressive behavior in the past 30 days at the end of the 9 week program
|
|
Scores of Bystanding Behavior in the Intervention Versus Control Group
Time Frame: Responses provided at the program end survey, 9 weeks after they were randomized
|
Bystander intentions are measured using the 5-item University of Illinois Willingness to Intervene scale.
Each of the items is measured on a 4-point Likert scale, resulting in a sum that ranges from 5 - 20.
A higher score reflects a greater willingness to intervene.
|
Responses provided at the program end survey, 9 weeks after they were randomized
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- R21HD104369 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.