Optimising Screening of Intermediate to High-risk Asymptomatic Sportsmen With Exercise Electrocardiogram (SEEPRED)

September 6, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Optimising Screening of Intermediate to High-risk Asymptomatic Sportsmen With Exercise Electrocardiogram. The SEEPRED Study.

The importance of exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) is still controversial in the prevention of cardiac events among sportsmen. The aim of this study was to assess the relevance of exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) as a significant prognostic marker for cardiovascular events when any cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are present.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The SEEPRED (Sport, Exercise ECG, prediction) prospective cohort study included leisure time sportsmen over 35 years old who performed exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) screening in the Sports Medicine Unit of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne from September 2011 to April 2016. Personal, familial history and physical examination were systematically performed before maximal exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). Cardiovascular events and changes in physical activity were searched after exercise electrocardiogram (ECG).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Saint-Étienne, France, 42055
        • CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE SAINT-ETIENNE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Leisure tim sportmen over 35 years.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients referred as asymptomatic by their general practitioner for an exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) screening test carried out as a standard procedure for resuming physical activity
  • Patients referred as a systematic pre-participation screening to be declared an athlete.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and
  • Patients with uninterpretable ST segment due to bundle branch block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sportsmen
Sportsmen (at least 1 hour of physical activity per week) over 35 years of age, referred by their doctor for a screening stress test on a bicycle ergometer in the sports medicine unit from September 2011 to August 2014
Diagnostic test: Screening stress test on a bicycle ergometer (usual practise)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Silent Myocardial ischemia (SMI)
Time Frame: Day 1
Determine the frequency of exercise-induced silent myocardial ischemia (SMI).
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gender record
Time Frame: Day 1
Gender will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Age record
Time Frame: Day 1
Age will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Physical activity levels record
Time Frame: Day 1
Physical activity levels will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Treatment record
Time Frame: Day 1
Treatment will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors record
Time Frame: Day 1
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Body mass index record
Time Frame: Day 1
Body mass index will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Score>5% record
Time Frame: Day 1
SCORE >5% will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Maximal heart record
Time Frame: Day 1
Maximal heart rate will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Maximal aerobic power record
Time Frame: Day 1
Maximal aerobic power will be recording during medical consultation in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Maximal blood lactate level record
Time Frame: Day 1
Maximal blood lactate level will be collected in order to predict positive exercise ECG
Day 1
Suspected SMI
Time Frame: Day 1
Exercise ECG screening test
Day 1
Confirmed SMI
Time Frame: Day 1
Exercise ECG screening test
Day 1
Cardiovascular events
Time Frame: Day 1
Exercise ECG screening test
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: DAVID HUPIN, MD, CHU St Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRBN372016/CHUSTE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings