Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Responding to PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy
Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Responding to PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy: a Patient Preference Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial
The treatment efficacy for stage IVb esophageal cancer has been improved through chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy recently.
On this basis, the investigators intend to conduct a prospective, multicenter phase II clinical trial to assess whether radiotherapy could further improve the survival of patients with metastatic esophageal cancer responding to PD-1 Inhibitor plus chemotherapy.
Accompanied tissue samples, blood samples and urine samples will be analyzed by molecular biological detection (Including Whole Exome Sequencing and proteomics) to explore potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes, efficacy and toxicity.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common carcinomas with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. More than 30% of the patients were stage IV when diagnosed. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EC for approximately four decades, however, only minimal improvement has been reached in overall survival (OS).
Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown effective antitumor activity in patients with unresectable, advanced or metastatic EC. Several randomized trials have demonstrated the PD-1 inhibitor could further improve the OS in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) on the basis of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has become one of the the standard treatment modality for metastatic EC.
As reported, for the patients with metastatic lung cancer or EC, locoregional radiotherapy could improve survival, especially in those who responding to systemic therapy. However, high-level evidence is still needed to assess whether these patients can benefit from local radiotherapy.
The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is obviously better than that of chemotherapy alone. On this basis, locoregional radiotherapy may help those patients with metastatic EC responding to systemic therapy improve local control, relieve the local symptoms, and even improve survival.
Therefore, the investigators intend to conduct a prospective, multicenter phase II trial to assess the efficiency and safety of radiotherapy with chemotherapy and immunotherapy for patients with metastatic EC. Accompanied tissue samples, blood samples and urine samples will be analyzed by molecular biological detection to explore potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes, efficacy and toxicity.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Wen-Yang Liu, MD
- Phone Number: 8601087787625
- Email: liuwenyang@cicams.ac.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100021
- Recruiting
- Cancer Hospital, CAMS
-
Contact:
- Wen-Yang Liu, MD
- Email: liuwenyang@cicams.ac.cn
-
Contact:
- Email: liuwenyang@cicams.ac.cn
-
Principal Investigator:
- Wen-Yang Liu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. ≥18 years, any gender
- 2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of esophageal cancer. The initial clinical stage is IVb (2018 AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition) or recurrent patients with recurrence after radical treatment (radical treatment includes surgery and radiotherapy, but the recurrence site cannot be located in the previous radiotherapy field).
- 3. ECOG performance status <= 1. Patients aged 65 years and over need to complete G8 screening or Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and the final evaluation is good;
- 4.There was no significant abnormality in laboratory routine indicators such as blood routine and liver and kidney function;
- 5.For patients after definitive or preoperative radiotherapy, no recurrence was in the prior radiation filed;
- 6.Expected survival is more than 12 weeks;
- 7.Informed consent provided;
- 8.With response to 2-4 cycles of the first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1.Patients with other cancer history except hypopharyngeal carcinoma in situ, non-malignant skin cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ.
- 2.Received surgery (except ostomy), chemotherapy or other anti-tumor treatment before enrollment;
- 3. Active infection currently exists . The following conditions occurred within 6 months before randomization: myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or received gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiopulmonary surgery;
- 4. History of allergy to chemotherapy drugs or autoimmune disease;
- 5. Participate in other clinical trials at present or within 4 weeks before enrollment;
- 6.There are factors such as high risk of fistula that radiotherapy cannot be safely carried out as assessed by the radiation oncologist.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Consolidation radiotherapy
This treatment group will be receive radiotherapy on the basis of standard first-line treatment, after all planned cycles of chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor completed.
|
A maximum of six cycles was recommended for chemotherapy.
Other Names:
IMRT/VMAT technique.
Patients receive radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week for an average of 5 weeks.
Radiotherapy is delivered to achieve a dosage of 49.22Gy/23f or 50Gy/25f to PGTV for lymphnode metastasis only patients and 40.66Gy/19f or 40Gy/20f for organ metastasis patients.
Radiation treatment is planned after chemotherapy completed.
Other Names:
Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab or Tislelizumab or Serplulimab or Toripalimab or Sintilimab or Camrelizumab
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Salvage radiotherapy
This treatment group will be receive salvage radiotherapy on the basis of standard first-line treatment, when disease progressed and salvage radiotherapy is recommended by multidisciplinary team.
|
A maximum of six cycles was recommended for chemotherapy.
Other Names:
Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab or Tislelizumab or Serplulimab or Toripalimab or Sintilimab or Camrelizumab
Other Names:
IMRT/VMAT technique.
Patients receive radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week for an average of 5 weeks.
Radiotherapy is delivered to achieve a dosage of 49.22Gy/23f or 50Gy/25f to PGTV for lymphnode metastasis only patients and 40.66~49.22Gy/19f
~23f or 40~50Gy/20~25f for organ metastasis patients.
Radiation treatment is planned after disease progression when recommended by multidisciplinary team.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
EFFICACY:1-year overall survival probability
Time Frame: 12 month
|
Overall survival was defined as the time from first dose to death due to any cause.
Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up.
OS is reported for all participants of the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population.
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculated the 1-year survival probability.
|
12 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
EFFICACY: Median progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 12 month
|
Median progression-free survival (PFS), was defined as the time from first dose to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
|
12 month
|
|
SAFETY: Acute toxicity rate
Time Frame: One month within the end of one specific treatment
|
Acute toxicity Rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises within one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
|
One month within the end of one specific treatment
|
|
SAFETY: Late toxicity rate
Time Frame: One month after the end of one specific treatment.
|
Late toxicity rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises after one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
|
One month after the end of one specific treatment.
|
|
QUALITY OF LIFE: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Subscale Scores in Participants
Time Frame: 24 month
|
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30).
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
|
24 month
|
|
QUALITY OF LIFE: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-OES18 Subscale Scores in Participants
Time Frame: 24 month
|
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Oesophageal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18).
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
|
24 month
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Biomarkers for the predicting of efficacy
Time Frame: 24 month
|
To explore the dynamic changes of circulating tumor DNA (the frequency of specific mutations by Next-generation sequencing Methodology) from baseline, before and after radiotherapy.
|
24 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wen-Yang Liu, MD, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Principal Investigator: Zhi-Hao Lu, MD, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Guttmann DM, Mitra N, Bekelman J, Metz JM, Plastaras J, Feng W, Swisher-McClure S. Improved Overall Survival with Aggressive Primary Tumor Radiotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jul;12(7):1131-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
- Sun JM, Shen L, Shah MA, Enzinger P, Adenis A, Doi T, Kojima T, Metges JP, Li Z, Kim SB, Cho BC, Mansoor W, Li SH, Sunpaweravong P, Maqueda MA, Goekkurt E, Hara H, Antunes L, Fountzilas C, Tsuji A, Oliden VC, Liu Q, Shah S, Bhagia P, Kato K; KEYNOTE-590 Investigators. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2021 Aug 28;398(10302):759-771. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4. Erratum In: Lancet. 2021 Nov 20;398(10314):1874.
- Luo H, Lu J, Bai Y, Mao T, Wang J, Fan Q, Zhang Y, Zhao K, Chen Z, Gao S, Li J, Fu Z, Gu K, Liu Z, Wu L, Zhang X, Feng J, Niu Z, Ba Y, Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhang L, Min X, Huang J, Cheng Y, Wang D, Shen Y, Yang Q, Zou J, Xu RH; ESCORT-1st Investigators. Effect of Camrelizumab vs Placebo Added to Chemotherapy on Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The ESCORT-1st Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 14;326(10):916-925. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12836.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Esophageal Diseases
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Tubulin Modulators
- Antimitotic Agents
- Mitosis Modulators
- Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
- Carboplatin
- Paclitaxel
- Cisplatin
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BEIR 1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.