Phase 2a Study of Efficacy and Safety of OpSCF in Moderate to Severe AD (Atopic Dermatitis)

August 17, 2026 updated by: Insmed Incorporated

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OpSCF in the Treatment of Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a monoclonal antibody, OpSCF, in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema). OpSCF will be compared to a placebo. OpSCF or placebo will be administered every 2 weeks for 14 weeks, and the efficacy will be assessed two weeks later. After that, subjects may choose to enter an Open Label Extension phase in which all subjects will receive OpSCF every 4 weeks for 40 additional weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1H 1B9
        • Oshawa Clinic Dermatology Trials
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4W 2N2
        • Research Toronto
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 2V1
        • Innovaderm Research Inc
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1W 4R4
        • Centre de Recherche Saint-Louis
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 33607
        • Cahaba Dermatology & Skin Health Center
    • California
      • Fountain Valley, California, United States, 92708
        • First OC Dermatology Research
      • Inglewood, California, United States, 90301
        • Axon Clinical Research
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • University Clinical Trials
      • Sherman Oaks, California, United States, 91403
        • Unison Clinical Trials
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33456
        • Skin Care Research
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
        • Skin Research of South Florida
      • Miami Lakes, Florida, United States, 33014
        • RM Medical Research
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33607
        • Advanced Clinical Research Institute
    • Illinois
      • Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States, 60008
        • Arlington Dermatology
    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47906
        • Options Research Group
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40241
        • DS Research of Kentucky
    • Michigan
      • Auburn Hills, Michigan, United States, 48326
        • Oakland Hills Dermatology P.C
      • Bay City, Michigan, United States, 48706
        • Saginaw Bay Dermatology
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89509
        • Skin Cancer and Dermatology Institute
    • New York
      • Kew Gardens, New York, United States, 11415
        • Forest Hills Dermatology Group
    • Texas
      • Frisco, Texas, United States, 75034
        • Rodgers Dermatology
    • Washington
      • Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98004
        • Dermatology Of Seattle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has clinically confirmed diagnosis of active AD.
  • Subject has at least a 6-month history of AD
  • Subject is willing to use effective birth control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is a female who is breastfeeding, pregnant, or who is planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Subject has any clinically significant medical condition that would put the subject at undue risk or interfere with interpretation of study results.
  • Subject has used dupilumab within 26 weeks prior to Day 1.
  • Subject has used tralokinumab within 12 weeks prior to Day 1.

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: OpSCF 600 mg
Participants received OpSCF 600 milligrams (mg), once every 2 weeks (Q2W), subcutaneously (SC), up to 14 weeks in the placebo-controlled period.
Biological: OpSCF
Administered SC.
Other Names:
  • Humanized IgG4k, SCF248
Placebo Comparator: OpSCF Matching-Placebo
Participants received OpSCF matching-placebo, Q2W, SC, up to 14 weeks in the placebo-controlled period.
Biological: Placebo
Administered SC.
Experimental: OpSCF 600 mg/OpSCF 600mg
Participants who received OpSCF 600 mg and completed placebo-controlled treatment received OpSCF 600mg, once every 4 weeks (Q4W), SC, up to 36 weeks in the open-label extension (OLE) period.
Biological: OpSCF
Administered SC.
Other Names:
  • Humanized IgG4k, SCF248
Biological: Placebo
Administered SC.
Placebo Comparator: OpSCF Matching-Placebo/OpSCF 600 mg
Participants who received OpSCF matching-placebo and completed placebo-controlled treatment received OpSCF 600mg, Q4W, SC, up to 36 weeks in the OLE period.
Biological: OpSCF
Administered SC.
Other Names:
  • Humanized IgG4k, SCF248
Biological: Placebo
Administered SC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] & lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.
Baseline, Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Experienced At-Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up (up to Week 67)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered a pharmaceutical product & that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. It can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study product, whether or not considered related to the study product. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity & was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Any AE starting on or after the first dose date will be considered TEAE.
From first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up (up to Week 67)
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14
The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] & lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14
Change From Baseline in EASI at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The EASI quantifies the severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity and the % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] & lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0= absent; 1= mild;2= moderate;3= severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) and 6(90 to 100%). The EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI50)
Time Frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity & % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] & lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) & 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 50 response was defined as at least a 50% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 75% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI75)
Time Frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity & % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] & lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) & 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in EASI (EASI90)
Time Frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The EASI quantifies severity of a participant's AD based on both lesion severity & % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD lesions (erythema [E], induration/papulation[I], excoriation[Ex] & lichenification[L]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions[head(h), upper extremities(u), trunk(t), lower extremities(l)] on a 4-point scale:0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. EASI area score was based on % BSA with AD in body region: 0(no involvement), 1(< 10%),2 (10 to <30%), 3(30 to <50%), 4(50 to <70%), 5(70 to <90%) & 6(90 to 100%). EASI score is obtained as: EASI(A) = 0.1*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh)*Ah + 0.2*(Eu+Iu+Exu+Lu)*Au + 0.3*(Et +It+Ext+Lt)*At + 0.4*(El+Il+Exl+Ll)*Al. Total EASI score = 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores indicate greater severity of AD. Here, a negative change from baseline indicates less severity in AD. EASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% improvement in EASI relative to Baseline. 90% CI was based on exact Clopper-Pearson method.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline to Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD)
Time Frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The vIGA-AD was assessed by the principal investigator or sub-investigator using the descriptors that best described the overall appearance of the lesions. It is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity that ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear; No inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis 1 = Almost clear; Barely perceptible erythema, barely perceptible induration/papulation, and/or minimal lichenification 2 = Mild; Slight but definite erythema (pink), slight but definite induration/papulation, and/ or slight but definite lichenification 3 = Moderate; Clearly perceptible erythema (dull red), clearly perceptible induration/papulation, and/or clearly perceptible lichenification 4 = Severe; Marked erythema (deep or bright red), marked induration/ papulation, and/or marked lichenification. Percentage of participants who achieved at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline to clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) in vIGA-AD are reported here.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline in vIGA-AD
Time Frame: At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The vIGA-AD was assessed by the principal investigator or sub-investigator using the descriptors that best described the overall appearance of the lesions. It is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity that ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear; No inflammatory signs of atopic dermatitis 1 = Almost clear; Barely perceptible erythema, barely perceptible induration/papulation, and/or minimal lichenification 2 = Mild; Slight but definite erythema (pink), slight but definite induration/papulation, and/ or slight but definite lichenification 3 = Moderate; Clearly perceptible erythema (dull red), clearly perceptible induration/papulation, and/or clearly perceptible lichenification 4 = Severe; Marked erythema (deep or bright red), marked induration/ papulation, and/or marked lichenification. The percentage of participants with reduction from baseline of ≥2 grade in vIGA-AD score has been reported.
At Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily PP-NRS
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving At-Least a 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of the Daily PP-NRS
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
PP-NRS is based on the Numeric Rating Scale which was used to assess the level of itch the participant was experiencing. The following question was be asked to participants: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = "no itch" and 10 = "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?" Based on the score provided by participant, the PP-NRS score was assigned. Higher score indicates more severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. The percentage of participants who had at least a 4-point reduction in the NRS score at post-baseline visits has been reported.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involved With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The overall BSA affected by AD was evaluated (from 0% to 100%). It was calculated using the palm surface area method. This method states that palmar surface of 1 hand (using the participant's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Involved With AD
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
The overall BSA affected by AD was evaluated (from 0% to 100%). It was calculated using the palm surface area method. This method states that palmar surface of 1 hand (using the participant's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
ADCT questionnaire is a self-assessment comprised of 6 concise questions to evaluate participant's perceptions of AD symptoms and impacts on their life and function over the last week. Each question carries equal weight and is scored from 0 to 4, for a total score ranging between 0 and 24. Higher score indicates higher severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
POEM is a self-assessment of disease severity using 7 questions asked to participant. A maximum value of 28 can be assigned based on the participant's response to 7 questions scored from 0 to 4, where 0 = No days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days and 4 = Every day. Higher score indicates high severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
DLQI is a 10 questions questionnaire to measure how much skin problems have affected a participant's life over the last week. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 (0 = Not at all, 1 = A little, 2 = A lot and 3 = Very much). The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question, giving a total score ranging from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). The higher the score the more quality of life is impaired. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in QoL.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Placebo-controlled Period: Serum Concentrations of OpSCF Over Time
Time Frame: Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 85, 99, 102, 106 and 113
Days 15, 29, 43, 57, 85, 99, 102, 106 and 113
OLE Period: Serum Concentrations of OpSCF Over Time
Time Frame: Days 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337
Days 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309 and 337

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in blood biomarkers and IgE at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Blood tests
16 weeks
Change from baseline in skin biomarkers collected using skin biopsies at Weeks 4 and 16 (optional for consenting subjects)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Histopathological examination
16 weeks
Change from baseline in skin biomarkers collected using tape strips at Weeks 4 and 16 (optional for consenting subjects)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Analysis of proteomics and mRNA levels
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Insmed Incorporated

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Innovaderm Research Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Study Director, Insmed Incorporated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 3, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 18, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OpSCF-201

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings