Anesthetic Efficacy of 1.8 ml Versus 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration
Anesthetic Efficacy of 1.8 ml Compared to 3.6 ml of Articaine Buccal Infiltration in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Hebatullah Moheb Ibrahim
- Phone Number: 00201114563058
- Email: heba.eid@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy patients who are categorized as I or II according to The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA class I or II).
- No sex predilection
- Patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
- Patient with the ability to understand and use pain scales.
- Patients who accept to enroll in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients' allergies to any of the drugs or materials used in the study.
- Pregnant and lactating females.
- Patients taking analgesics in the last 6-8 hours.
- Patients having more than one symptomatic tooth in the same quadrant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1.8 ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration.
|
1.8 ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration
|
|
Experimental: 3.6 ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration
|
3.6 ml 4% articaine buccal infiltration
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anesthetic success
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Will be measured by 11-point numerical rating scale NRS.
The success will be defined as no or mild pain (NRS 0 or less than 3) and the failure will be defined as moderate to severe pain (NRS more than 3).
|
During the procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Need for supplemental anesthesia
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Whether the patient requires supplemental anesthesia or not.
It will be recorded by the questionnaire (yes or no).
|
During the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Abazarpoor R, Parirokh M, Nakhaee N, Abbott PV. A Comparison of Different Volumes of Articaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Molar Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
- Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, Indira R, Ramachandran S. Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod. 2011 Dec;37(12):1603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.009.
- Monteiro MR, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F, Volpato MC, Almeida JF. 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for emergency root canal treatment in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits: a randomized clinical study. Int Endod J. 2015 Feb;48(2):145-52. doi: 10.1111/iej.12293. Epub 2014 May 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CU-Endo.23.10.23
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.