Assessment of Automatic Tourniquets for Soldiers During Wartime
Assessment of Automatic Tourniquets for Soldiers During Wartime as Part of Accelerated Research and Development
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare usability and performance of automatic tourniquets (AUT) and standard mechanical tourniquets (CAT) in healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are AUTs effective in occlusion of blood flow
- Are AUTs easy to use
Participants will be asked to place AUT and CAT on their upper limbs and lower limbs (8 applications overall).
Following each application, the following parameters will be assessed:
- Limb blood flow
- Ease of use
Researchers will compare the results of the AUT and CAT to see if AUT is as effective as CAT in blood occlusion, and if AUT is easy to use as the CAT.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare usability and performance of automatic tourniquets (AUT) and standard mechanical tourniquets (CAT) in healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are AUTs effective in occlusion of blood flow
- Are AUTs easy to use
Participants will be asked to place AUT and CAT on their upper limbs and lower limbs (8 applications overall).
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Tomer Erlich, MD
- Phone Number: +972-3-737-9506
- Email: tomer.erlich@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ramat Gan, Israel
- Recruiting
- Tel Hashomer
-
Contact:
- Tomer Erlich, MD
- Phone Number: +972-3-737-9506
- Email: tomer.erlich@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
-Soldier in active service or active reserve service.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Muscle disorders
- Peripheral nerve disorders
- Skin diseases of the limbs
- Limb surgery in the past
- Rickets
- Hypertension
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Automatic Tourniquet
Automatic pneumatic tourniquet
|
Tourniquets will be applied until peripheral blood flow occlusion is achieved.
Total intervention time: up to 60 seconds
|
|
Active Comparator: Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT)
Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7
|
Tourniquets will be applied until peripheral blood flow occlusion is achieved.
Total intervention time: up to 60 seconds
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to distal limb arterial occlusion as assessed by Doppler
Time Frame: 60 seconds
|
Time to distal limb arterial occlusion as assessed by Doppler is recorded
|
60 seconds
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety of using automatic tourniquets
Time Frame: Will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
|
Safety issues, specifically peripheral limb numbness will be assessed via questionnaire.
Scale is from 0 to 5, 0 is "No numbness", 5 is "Severe numbness"
|
Will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
|
|
Usability of using automatic tourniquets
Time Frame: Ease of use will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
|
Usability of using automatic tourniquets will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
Scale for ease to secure the tourniquet is from 0 to 5, 0 is "Very difficult to secure", 5 is "Very easy to secure"
|
Ease of use will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tomer Erlich, MD, Head of Medical innovation and R&D
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1.1
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.